ci: add zizmor for GitHub Actions security analysis#17
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the project's CI/CD security posture by integrating Zizmor for comprehensive GitHub Actions security analysis. It introduces measures to improve supply chain safety by pinning action versions and disabling credential persistence, alongside establishing a dedicated CI workflow for code scanning and enabling local security checks via a pre-commit hook. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Ignored Files
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool. What Enabling Code Scanning Means:
For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughUpdates CI/security tooling: pins multiple actions in the Docker release workflow to commit SHAs and adds persist-credentials handling; adds two new workflows for zizmor security analysis and actionlint; and expands pre-commit configuration to include actionlint and zizmor hooks. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📝 Coding Plan
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request enhances the project's security posture by integrating the zizmor security scanner. The changes include adding a zizmor pre-commit hook and, as described, new GitHub Actions workflows for security analysis. My review of the provided changes includes one recommendation to further harden the supply chain security by pinning the new pre-commit hook to a commit SHA, which is consistent with the goal of pinning other actions mentioned in the pull request description.
| args: [--check] | ||
|
|
||
| - repo: https://github.com/zizmorcore/zizmor-pre-commit | ||
| rev: v1.23.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For improved supply chain security, it's recommended to pin the rev to a specific commit SHA instead of a tag. Tags are mutable and can be moved to point to a different commit, which could introduce a supply chain risk. Since a goal of this PR is to improve security by pinning actions to a SHA, it would be consistent to apply the same practice here. Please replace the tag v1.23.1 with its corresponding full commit SHA.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds automated GitHub Actions security analysis via zizmor and tightens CI supply-chain security by pinning actions and reducing checkout token persistence.
Changes:
- Add zizmor as a pre-commit hook for local workflow security checks.
- Introduce a
zizmor.ymlGitHub Actions workflow intended to run zizmor in CI. - Pin GitHub Actions used in
release_docker.ymlto SHAs and setpersist-credentials: falseon checkout.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| .pre-commit-config.yaml | Adds zizmor pre-commit hook for local checks. |
| .github/workflows/zizmor.yml | New CI workflow to run zizmor with minimal permissions. |
| .github/workflows/release_docker.yml | Pins actions to SHAs, disables persisted checkout credentials, and adds a zizmor suppression annotation. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| - name: Run zizmor | ||
| uses: zizmorcore/zizmor-action@71321a20a9ded102f6e9ce5718a2fcec2c4f70d8 # v0.5.2 |
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
| build: | ||
| build: # zizmor: ignore[secrets-outside-env] |
Summary
release_docker.ymlfor supply chain safetypersist-credentials: falseto checkout stepszizmor.ymlCI workflow with SARIF upload to GitHub Code ScanningTest plan
uvx zizmor .passes with no findingspre-commit run zizmor --all-filespassesSummary by CodeRabbit