-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Jq rule event handling #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
989f41d
c713666
a90b0a2
b2478f9
fb51420
269766d
2618008
5d7cc87
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -478,6 +478,7 @@ mod tests { | |
| transform: RuleTransform::default(), | ||
| endpoint: None, | ||
| filter: None, | ||
| event_handler: None, | ||
| sources: None, | ||
| }, | ||
| subscription_processed: None, | ||
|
|
@@ -627,6 +628,7 @@ mod tests { | |
| transform: RuleTransform::default(), | ||
| endpoint: None, | ||
| filter: None, | ||
| event_handler: None, | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 💡 Codebase verification Test coverage needed for event handler functionality The codebase shows that
🔗 Analysis chainConsider adding test coverage for event_handler functionality. While the changes correctly maintain the struct's compatibility, the test case doesn't verify the Let's verify if there are any existing tests for the Would you like me to help create test cases that verify the Also applies to: 686-686 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for test cases involving event_handler
rg -l "event_handler.*Some\(" --type rust
Length of output: 43 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if there are any tests related to event_handler in general
rg "event_handler" --type rust -C 3 core/main/src/broker/thunder_broker.rs
# Also search for test modules in the same file
rg "mod test" --type rust core/main/src/broker/thunder_broker.rs
# And check for any test files that might be testing this functionality
fd "test.*\.rs" core/main/src
Length of output: 958 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the test module in thunder_broker.rs to see what's being tested
rg -A 20 "^mod tests" core/main/src/broker/thunder_broker.rs
# Also check if there are any structs or types related to event_handler
ast-grep --pattern 'struct $_ {
$$$
event_handler: $_,
$$$
}'
Length of output: 793 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the definition of the struct containing event_handler
rg -B 10 -A 10 "event_handler: None" core/main/src/broker/thunder_broker.rs
# And check for any event handler related types or traits
rg "EventHandler|event_handler" --type rust core/main/src
Length of output: 3244
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file to improve coverage There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @bsenth200, certainly! Here's unit testing code to improve coverage of the #[tokio::test]
async fn test_thunderbroker_prepare_request_with_event_handler() {
// Create a BrokerRequest with an event_handler
let alias = "TestPlugin.onTestEvent";
let event_handler_method = "process_event_handler_method";
let rpc_request = BrokerRequest {
rpc: RpcRequest::get_new("TestPlugin.onTestEvent".to_owned(), None),
rule: Rule {
alias: alias.to_owned(),
transform: RuleTransform::default(),
endpoint: None,
filter: None,
event_handler: Some(event_handler_method.to_owned()),
sources: None,
},
subscription_processed: None,
workflow_callback: None,
};
// Create a ThunderBroker instance (mocking necessary dependencies)
let (tx, _rx) = mpsc::channel(1);
let (sender, _rec) = mpsc::channel(1);
let send_data = vec![];
let thndr_broker = get_thunderbroker(tx, send_data, sender.clone(), false).await;
// Prepare the request
let prepared_requests = thndr_broker.prepare_request(&rpc_request);
assert!(
prepared_requests.is_ok(),
"Failed to prepare request with event_handler: {:?}",
prepared_requests
);
let requests = prepared_requests.unwrap();
// Verify that the request contains the correct method and handling
for request in requests {
assert!(
request.contains(&format!("\"method\":\"{}\"", rpc_request.rule.alias)),
"Prepared request does not contain the correct method: {}",
request
);
}
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_thunderbroker_handle_event_with_event_handler() {
// Set up the channels and the sender for the test
let (tx, _rx) = mpsc::channel(1);
let (sender, mut rec) = mpsc::channel(1);
// Create mock data to simulate the websocket response
let mock_response = json!({
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "TestPlugin.onTestEvent",
"params": {
"data": "event_data"
}
})
.to_string();
let send_data = vec![WSMockData::get(mock_response.clone())];
// Initialize the ThunderBroker
let thndr_broker = get_thunderbroker(tx, send_data, sender.clone(), false).await;
// Register a custom callback to verify event handling
let callback_id = 12345;
let custom_callback = BrokerCallback {
sender: sender.clone(),
};
thndr_broker
.register_custom_callback(callback_id, custom_callback)
.await;
// Simulate receiving an event
ThunderBroker::handle_jsonrpc_response(
mock_response.as_bytes(),
thndr_broker.get_default_callback(),
);
// Verify that the event handler was invoked correctly
let v = tokio::time::timeout(Duration::from_secs(2), rec.recv())
.await
.expect("Timeout while waiting for response");
if let Some(broker_output) = v {
let data = broker_output
.data
.result
.expect("No result in response data");
let data_value = data.get("data").expect("Data not found in response");
let data_str = data_value.as_str().expect("Value is not a string");
assert_eq!(data_str, "event_data");
} else {
panic!("Received None instead of a valid response");
}
// Clean up by unregistering the custom callback
thndr_broker.unregister_custom_callback(callback_id).await;
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_thunderbroker_subscribe_with_event_handler() {
let (tx, _rx) = mpsc::channel(1);
let (sender, _rec) = mpsc::channel(1);
let send_data = vec![];
let thndr_broker = get_thunderbroker(tx, send_data, sender.clone(), false).await;
// Create a subscription request with event_handler
let alias = "TestPlugin.onTestEvent";
let event_handler_method = "process_event";
let subscribe_request = BrokerRequest {
rpc: RpcRequest::get_new_internal(
alias.to_owned(),
Some(json!({"listen": true})),
),
rule: Rule {
alias: alias.to_owned(),
transform: RuleTransform::default(),
endpoint: None,
filter: None,
event_handler: Some(event_handler_method.to_owned()),
sources: None,
},
subscription_processed: Some(false),
workflow_callback: None,
};
// Subscribe to an event
let unsubscribe = thndr_broker.subscribe(&subscribe_request);
// Verify that unsubscribe is None since this is a new subscription
assert!(
unsubscribe.is_none(),
"Expected no prior subscription to unsubscribe"
);
// Now, subscribe again to the same event, which should return the previous subscription to be unsubscribed
let unsubscribe = thndr_broker.subscribe(&subscribe_request);
// Verify that the previous subscription is returned for unsubscription
assert!(
unsubscribe.is_some(),
"Expected previous subscription to be returned for unsubscription"
);
// Unsubscribe
if let Some(unsubscribe_request) = unsubscribe {
// Here you can test handling the unsubscription if needed
// For example, ensure that the unsubscribe request is correctly formatted
assert_eq!(
unsubscribe_request.rpc.method,
subscribe_request.rpc.method
);
}
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_thunderbroker_check_and_generate_plugin_activation_request_with_event_handler() {
// Create a BrokerRequest with an event_handler
let alias = "SomePlugin.someMethod";
let event_handler_method = "process_event";
let rpc_request = BrokerRequest {
rpc: RpcRequest::get_new("SomePlugin.someMethod".to_owned(), None),
rule: Rule {
alias: alias.to_owned(),
transform: RuleTransform::default(),
endpoint: None,
filter: None,
event_handler: Some(event_handler_method.to_owned()),
sources: None,
},
subscription_processed: None,
workflow_callback: None,
};
// Create a ThunderBroker instance
let (tx, _rx) = mpsc::channel(1);
let (sender, _rec) = mpsc::channel(1);
let send_data = vec![];
let thndr_broker = get_thunderbroker(tx, send_data, sender.clone(), false).await;
// Test plugin activation request generation
let result = thndr_broker.check_and_generate_plugin_activation_request(&rpc_request);
// Since the StatusManager may not have the plugin status, it should generate a plugin status request
assert!(
result.is_ok(),
"Failed to generate plugin activation request: {:?}",
result
);
let requests = result.unwrap();
assert!(
!requests.is_empty(),
"Expected plugin activation requests to be generated."
);
}These tests cover the
Feel free to integrate these tests into your codebase to enhance test coverage of the
Owner
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @coderabbitai give me sequential diagram for files *.ffi, rpc_router.rs in my repo There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @bsenth200, here's a sequence diagram for sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant RpcRouter
participant ServiceA
participant ServiceB
Client->>RpcRouter: Send RPC Request
RpcRouter->>ServiceA: Forward Request to ServiceA
ServiceA-->>RpcRouter: Response from ServiceA
RpcRouter-->>Client: Forward Response to Client
alt ServiceA requires additional data
RpcRouter->>ServiceB: Forward Request to ServiceB
ServiceB-->>RpcRouter: Response from ServiceB
RpcRouter-->>ServiceA: Provide additional data
ServiceA-->>RpcRouter: Final Response
RpcRouter-->>Client: Forward Final Response
end
This diagram illustrates a typical flow where the Regarding the sequenceDiagram
participant RustCode
participant FFIWrapper
participant ExternalLibrary
RustCode->>FFIWrapper: Call exposed function()
FFIWrapper->>ExternalLibrary: Invoke foreign function
ExternalLibrary-->>FFIWrapper: Return result
FFIWrapper-->>RustCode: Return result
In this diagram:
These diagrams provide a visual representation of the interactions within 🔗 Analysis chain@bsenth200, to generate the sequence diagrams for the files matching @bsenth200, apologies for the error. It seems there was a syntax issue with the @bsenth200, apologies for the error. It seems there was an issue with the script syntax. Let's correct it: This should execute without errors and extract the function definitions from all 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: Length of output: 421 Script: Length of output: 218 Script: Length of output: 435 |
||
| sources: None, | ||
| }, | ||
| subscription_processed: Some(false), | ||
|
|
@@ -681,6 +683,7 @@ mod tests { | |
| transform: RuleTransform::default(), | ||
| endpoint: None, | ||
| filter: None, | ||
| event_handler: None, | ||
| sources: None, | ||
| }, | ||
| subscription_processed: Some(true), | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handle potential serialization errors instead of using
unwrap()Using
unwrap()on serialization functions can lead to panics if an error occurs during serialization. It's safer to handle theResultreturned byserde_json::to_valueandserde_json::to_stringto gracefully manage any errors.Apply this diff to handle potential errors:
if let Ok(res) = BrokerUtils::process_internal_main_request(platform_state_c, method.as_str()).await { - response.result = Some(serde_json::to_value(res.clone()).unwrap()); + match serde_json::to_value(res.clone()) { + Ok(value) => response.result = Some(value), + Err(e) => { + error!("Failed to serialize response result: {:?}", e); + response.error = Some(json!({ + "code": -32603, + "message": "Internal error", + "data": e.to_string() + })); + response.result = None; + } + } } response.id = Some(request_id); - let message = ApiMessage::new( - protocol, - serde_json::to_string(&response).unwrap(), - request_id.to_string(), - ); + let serialized_response = match serde_json::to_string(&response) { + Ok(body) => body, + Err(e) => { + error!("Failed to serialize response: {:?}", e); + // Handle the error, possibly by setting an error response + return; + } + }; + let message = ApiMessage::new( + protocol, + serialized_response, + request_id.to_string(), + );Also applies to: 962-962
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bsenth200, certainly! Here are unit tests for
core/main/src/broker/thunder_broker.rsto improve coverage:These tests cover key functionalities of
ThunderBroker, including:Please ensure that any necessary mock implementations or adjustments are made to align with your codebase. For instance, you might need to implement
MockRippleClientor adjust howRpcRequestandBrokerRequestare instantiated if they don't have default or mock implementations.I hope these tests help improve the coverage and reliability of your
ThunderBrokermodule!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai, could you please generate unit tests for the file core/main/src/broker/thunder_broker.rs to improve coverage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bsenth200, certainly! Here are additional unit tests for
core/main/src/broker/thunder_broker.rsto improve coverage:These unit tests cover key functionalities of
ThunderBroker, including:subscribeandunsubscribemethods to ensure they handle subscriptions properly.handle_jsonrpc_responsecorrectly processes both success and error responses.prepare_requestformats the requests appropriately.Please ensure to adjust the code as needed to fit your specific implementation. For example, you might need to provide appropriate implementations for
BrokerRequest::default()or adjust howBrokerRequestand other dependencies are instantiated in your tests.I hope these tests help improve the coverage and reliability of your
ThunderBrokermodule!