Update GitHub Action Versions

[Jamie-BitFlight]

GitHub Actions Version Updates

• reviewdog/action-eslint published a new release v1.23.0 on 2024-02-08T17:25:20Z
• xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher published a new release v3.0.0 on 2024-02-24T23:41:19Z
• davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action published a new release v2.3.1 on 2024-04-12T09:35:50Z
• actions/checkout published a new release v4.1.1 on 2023-10-17T15:53:17Z
• pozil/auto-assign-issue published a new release v1.14.0 on 2024-04-04T07:51:37Z

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated GitHub Actions to enhance automation workflows:
    • Improved issue assignment automation.
    • Enhanced code checkout process.
    • Advanced code linting capabilities.
    • Upgraded test coverage reporting.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The update enhances several GitHub workflows by upgrading the versions of actions used. These updates likely introduce new features and improvements in efficiency and security. Changes include updates to auto-assign, checkout, linting tools, and test coverage reporting actions across different workflows.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
.github/workflows/assign.yml	Updated pozil/auto-assign-issue to v1.14.0.
.github/workflows/.../github_actions_version_updater.yml	Updated actions/checkout to v4.1.1.
.github/workflows/.../push_code_linting.yml	Updated markdownlint-problem-matcher to 3.0.0 and action-eslint to 1.23.0, modified reporter for action-eslint.
.github/workflows/test.yml	Updated davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action to v2.3.1.

---

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f822bc2 and d238ce9.

Files selected for processing (4)

• .github/workflows/assign.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml

Additional comments not posted (4)

.github/workflows/assign.yml (1)

9-9: Updated pozil/auto-assign-issue to v1.14.0 and added a condition to exclude dependabot[bot]. Ensure this condition is effectively preventing issue assignments to the bot.

Verification successful

---

The condition if: github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]' in the .github/workflows/assign.yml file is correctly implemented to exclude dependabot[bot] from being assigned issues. This ensures that automated processes do not assign issues to this bot, aligning with the intended functionality of the workflow update.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any issues assigned to dependabot[bot] after this workflow runs
rg --type yaml "dependabot\[bot\]" .github/workflows/assign.yml

Length of output: 111

.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (2)

43-43: Updated xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher to v3.0.0. Verify that the new version is compatible with the existing linting configurations.

Verification successful

---

The shell script executed a search for the string "markdownlint-problem-matcher@v3.0.0" within the .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml file and confirmed that the version v3.0.0 of xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher is indeed used in the workflow file as specified in the review comment.

Since the script output matches the expected line from the review comment, this confirms that the update to xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher to version v3.0.0 has been correctly implemented in the workflow file. There is no indication from this script about compatibility issues or errors caused by this version update; however, the script was not designed to check for such issues.

Given the information available, the update to the markdownlint-problem-matcher action in the workflow file is verified as correctly implemented. However, the compatibility and functionality with existing configurations, as mentioned in the review comment, remain to be verified through actual use or further detailed testing.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any linting errors in recent PRs that might be related to the new version
rg --type yaml "markdownlint-problem-matcher@v3.0.0" .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml

Length of output: 150

---

47-47: Updated reviewdog/action-eslint to v1.23.0 and changed the reporter to github-pr-review. Ensure that the new reporter is correctly displaying linting results in PRs.

Verification successful

---

The verification process has confirmed that the reviewdog/action-eslint GitHub action has been updated to version v1.23.0 and the reporter has been changed to github-pr-review in the .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml file. Both changes align with the details provided in the review comment.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any PRs where the new reporter might have failed to display linting results
rg --type yaml "github-pr-review" .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml

Length of output: 129

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the version of reviewdog/action-eslint in the YAML file
rg --type yaml "uses: reviewdog/action-eslint@" .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml

Length of output: 135

.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

54-54: Updated davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action to v2.3.1. Verify that the new version is producing accurate and complete coverage reports.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Coverage Report

Status	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🔵	Lines	72.11%	2092 / 2901
🔵	Statements	72.11%	2092 / 2901
🔵	Functions	76.13%	67 / 88
🔵	Branches	82.96%	190 / 229

File Coverage

No changed files found.

Generated in workflow #80

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.