Skip to content

Conversation

@Jamie-BitFlight
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamie-BitFlight Jamie-BitFlight commented Mar 24, 2024

GitHub Actions Version Updates

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the version of actions/checkout used in GitHub Actions workflows.
    • Improved code linting by updating the versions of markdownlint-problem-matcher and action-eslint. Also refined linting scope to target source files more accurately.
    • Enhanced test coverage reporting by updating the vitest-coverage-report-action version.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates involve version upgrades for GitHub Actions in a project's workflow files. These upgrades include minor and patch version increments for actions related to code checkout, linting, and test coverage reporting. The changes aim to leverage the latest features and improvements of these actions, enhancing the efficiency and reliability of the continuous integration process.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/github_actions_...yml Updated actions/checkout from v4 to v4.1.1.
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml Upgraded to markdownlint-problem-matcher@v3.0.0 from v2, action-eslint@v1.23.0 from v1.20.0, and changed eslint_flags to src/.
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action from v2 to v2.3.0.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Statements 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Functions 76.13% 67 / 88
🔵 Branches 82.96% 190 / 229
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #77

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f822bc2 and 1828316.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1)
  • 14-14: The update to actions/checkout@v4.1.1 looks good.

Please ensure to review the action's release notes for any breaking changes or new features that could be leveraged in this workflow.

.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (2)
  • 43-43: The update to xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher@v3.0.0 looks good.

Please review the action's release notes for any breaking changes or new features that could be leveraged in this workflow.

  • 47-47: The update to reviewdog/action-eslint@v1.23.0 and the change to eslint_flags: src/ look good.

Please review the action's release notes for any breaking changes or new features that could be leveraged in this workflow. Additionally, ensure to test the linting process to confirm it behaves as expected with the new eslint_flags parameter.

.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
  • 54-54: The update to davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action@v2.3.0 looks good.

Please ensure to review the action's release notes for any breaking changes or new features that could be leveraged in this workflow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants