Skip to content

Pull request description updates#90

Open
benmed00 wants to merge 8 commits intomainfrom
cursor/pull-request-description-updates-29b9
Open

Pull request description updates#90
benmed00 wants to merge 8 commits intomainfrom
cursor/pull-request-description-updates-29b9

Conversation

@benmed00
Copy link
Owner

@benmed00 benmed00 commented Jan 10, 2026

Description

Description

This PR introduces a set of files to standardize the descriptions of 15 existing open pull requests, aligning them with the repository's documentation and PR template. It includes generated descriptions for each PR and a script to automate their update, though manual application is currently required due to API permission limitations.

Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • 📚 Documentation update
  • 🎨 Style/formatting changes
  • ♻️ Code refactoring
  • ⚡ Performance improvement
  • ✅ Test additions/updates
  • 🔧 Build/config changes

Related Issues

Closes #
Related to #

Changes Made

  • PR_DESCRIPTIONS_TO_UPDATE.md: Contains the full, formatted descriptions for all 15 target PRs.
  • update_all_pr_descriptions.py: A Python script designed to automate the update of PR descriptions via the GitHub API (requires a token with write permissions).
  • update_prs_automated.sh: A helper shell script for reference.
  • PR_UPDATE_SUMMARY.md: Provides an overview, status, and instructions for updating the PRs.

Testing

Test Steps

  1. Review PR_DESCRIPTIONS_TO_UPDATE.md to ensure descriptions are correctly formatted and contain relevant information (version changes, compatibility, checklists, metadata).
  2. Examine update_all_pr_descriptions.py for correctness and adherence to the GitHub API for PR body updates.
  3. Verify the instructions in PR_UPDATE_SUMMARY.md are clear and actionable.

Test Results

  • All existing tests pass
  • New tests added (if applicable)
  • Manual testing completed (of generated content and script logic; actual PR updates were blocked by permissions)

Screenshots (if applicable)

Checklist

  • My code follows the project's style guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published
  • File headers have been updated
  • No sensitive data or credentials are included
  • No console.logs or debug code left in

Additional Notes

The automated script (update_all_pr_descriptions.py) was unable to update the PRs directly due to insufficient GitHub API token permissions (lacked write access to pull requests). Therefore, the primary output of this PR is the PR_DESCRIPTIONS_TO_UPDATE.md file, which facilitates manual updates. The PR_UPDATE_SUMMARY.md provides detailed instructions for both manual and automated (if permissions are granted) update processes.

Reviewers

@


Open in Cursor Open in Web

Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • 📚 Documentation update
  • 🎨 Style/formatting changes
  • ♻️ Code refactoring
  • ⚡ Performance improvement
  • ✅ Test additions/updates
  • 🔧 Build/config changes

Changes Made

  • See commit history

Testing

  • All existing tests pass
  • New tests added (if applicable)
  • Manual testing completed

Related

  • Milestone: v1.3 - Quality & Polish
  • Priority: Medium

🚀 Status

⏳ Awaiting review

@cursor
Copy link

cursor bot commented Jan 10, 2026

Cursor Agent can help with this pull request. Just @cursor in comments and I'll start working on changes in this branch.
Learn more about Cursor Agents

Add comprehensive scripts for managing pull request descriptions and metadata:

- update_all_pr_descriptions.py: Automates updating PR descriptions according to repository documentation
- update_all_pr_metadata.py: Updates PR metadata (milestones, labels, assignees, project board)
- verify_pr_metadata.py: Verification tool for PR metadata completeness
- update_prs_automated.sh: Helper script for automated PR updates

These scripts follow the guidelines in docs/ALL_PRS_UPDATE_GUIDE.md and support
the v1.3 - Quality & Polish milestone maintenance tasks.

Related to: PR #90
@cursor cursor bot force-pushed the cursor/pull-request-description-updates-29b9 branch from 5eac01b to b1001d3 Compare January 10, 2026 23:19
cursoragent and others added 2 commits January 10, 2026 23:19
Co-authored-by: benyakoub.pro <benyakoub.pro@gmail.com>
Move COMMIT_ORGANIZATION_SUMMARY.md to docs/status-reports/ directory
to keep it with other status reports and maintain repository organization.

Related to: PR #90
@benmed00 benmed00 marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2026 23:23
@benmed00 benmed00 requested a review from ben-dev-code January 10, 2026 23:23
- Fix E2E tests workflow to handle standalone output mode correctly
  - Use 'node .next/standalone/server.js' when standalone build exists
  - Fallback to 'npm start' for non-standalone builds
- Fix test workflow to use 'npm run test:run' command
- Remove empty test files causing test failures:
  - src/lib/pagination.test.ts (empty)
  - src/lib/validation-helpers.test.ts (empty)

These fixes address the 3 failing workflow checks:
- E2E Tests (Playwright) - server startup issue
- Run Tests - empty test file errors
- PR Quality Assessment - will be fixed with PR description update

Related to: PR #90
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: Todo

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments