feat: smart sessions core revamp

[vr16x]

PR-Codex overview

This PR introduces a debug mode for the SDK, enhancing error logging and adding new functionalities for session management and action policies. It also refines existing methods and types to support these features, improving overall usability and clarity.

Detailed summary

• Added isDebugMode property in several interfaces.
• Introduced signSessionQuote and executeSessionQuote functions for session management.
• Enhanced error logging to utilize console.error when isDebugMode is true.
• Updated various functions to support simulationOverrides.
• Improved action policy building with new methods for session actions.
• Refined types and parameters in multiple files for better clarity and usability.

The following files were skipped due to too many changes: src/sdk/account/decorators/buildActionPolicy.ts, src/sdk/modules/validators/smartSessions/decorators/mee/prepareForPermissions.ts, src/sdk/account/decorators/buildSessionAction.ts, src/sdk/account/decorators/buildSessionAction.test.ts, src/sdk/clients/decorators/mee/getQuoteSimulations.test.ts, src/sdk/clients/decorators/mee/getSessionQuote.test.ts, src/sdk/clients/decorators/mee/getSessionQuote.ts, src/sdk/modules/validators/smartSessions/toMultichainSmartSessions.test.ts

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

[github-actions]

size-limit report 📦

Path	Size
core (esm)	81.27 KB (+3.49% 🔺)
core (cjs)	102.31 KB (+3.38% 🔺)
bundler (tree-shaking)	7 KB (+0.05% 🔺)
paymaster (tree-shaking)	543 B (0%)

[vr16x]

1 test case failed because of the hook timeout glitch. So all good

[fichiokaku]

just one thing I've noticed:

If the user already has an action for the fee token (same selector + address) but with a policy that is not SPENDING_LIMITS_POLICY_ADDRESS (e.g. only usage or time-frame), the code leaves that action unchanged and does not add a separate payment action (isPolicyForPaymentTokenExists is true). So the session might not have a spending limit for fees

So could we:

• add a spending-limit policy to that existing action when the target is the fee token , or
• add a separate payment action when no spending limit exists for the fee token,
  so that “same as feeToken” always gets a payment policy merged in, not only when there’s already a spending-limit policy?

[fichiokaku]

calldataArgument is exported from buildActionPolicy and used in tests and in prepare-for-smart-session. Should we in general export this to our sdk users?

[vr16x]

@fichiokaku The payment policy checks happens and if its missing its being added here. So we're good here

https://github.com/bcnmy/abstractjs/pull/181/changes#diff-a9eb77c527ef34aef0b19399fe428629e86a8ef4e55f2aa3fe902dfa20194209R455

[vr16x]

calldataArgument is exported from buildActionPolicy and used in tests and in prepare-for-smart-session. Should we in general export this to our sdk users?

This is a good catch, I wanted this to be exported for developers as well. Will fix this

UPDATED: Its fixed

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 93.90582% with 66 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 77.73%. Comparing base (44b050f) to head (3cb6e02).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/sdk/clients/decorators/mee/getSessionQuote.ts	94.47%	12 Missing ⚠️
src/sdk/account/decorators/buildActionPolicy.ts	82.53%	11 Missing ⚠️
...ients/decorators/mee/getSupertransactionReceipt.ts	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
...clients/decorators/mee/getQuoteSimulations.test.ts	50.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
...sdk/clients/decorators/mee/getSessionQuote.test.ts	97.10%	6 Missing ⚠️
...rtSessions/decorators/mee/prepareForPermissions.ts	83.78%	6 Missing ⚠️
src/sdk/account/decorators/buildSessionAction.ts	93.75%	5 Missing ⚠️
src/sdk/clients/decorators/mee/getFusionQuote.ts	71.42%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/sdk/clients/decorators/mee/getQuote.ts	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/sdk/modules/utils/Helpers.ts	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
... and 5 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #181      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    73.28%   77.73%   +4.45%     
===========================================
  Files          265      284      +19     
  Lines         9404    11450    +2046     
  Branches      1325     1597     +272     
===========================================
+ Hits          6892     8901    +2009     
- Misses        2512     2549      +37     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[vr16x]

Paid tests are passing: https://github.com/bcnmy/abstractjs/actions/runs/22619772898/job/65541617020