update client docs for baas use

[wixysam]

No description provided.

[claude]

Claude finished @wixysam's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Update Client Docs for BaaS Use

• Read and analyze README.md changes
• Review src/client.ts implementation changes
• Review src/client.types.ts type definitions
• Assess code quality and best practices
• Check for potential bugs or issues
• Evaluate performance considerations
• Identify security concerns
• Assess test coverage

Review Summary

This PR updates the documentation to better support Base44 as a Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). The changes are primarily documentation improvements with no functional code changes.

✅ Code Quality and Best Practices

Strengths:

• Clear distinction between internal Base44 app usage and external app usage
• Well-structured documentation with practical examples
• Consistent terminology throughout ("BaaS", "backend", "external apps")
• Good use of TypeScript examples with proper imports

Documentation improvements:

• The README now provides a clearer onboarding experience with separate sections for different use cases
• Added installation instructions for external apps
• Service role documentation properly warns about security considerations

✅ Potential Bugs or Issues

No bugs identified. The changes are documentation-only with the following observations:

• All code changes in src/client.ts and src/client.types.ts are JSDoc comment updates
• No functional code modifications that could introduce bugs
• Proper use of @internal tags for properties that shouldn't be used directly

✅ Performance Considerations

No performance impact. All changes are documentation-related:

• No runtime code modifications
• No changes to data structures or algorithms
• No new dependencies added

✅ Security Concerns

Security is properly addressed:

• Service role token is correctly marked as @internal in types (client.types.ts:49-51)
• Clear documentation that service role is "only available in Base44-hosted backend functions"
• Good security guidance in the service role example

Minor suggestion: Consider adding a warning in the external apps section about keeping the appId secure when it contains sensitive configuration.

⚠️ Test Coverage

No tests added or updated. While this is acceptable for documentation-only changes, consider:

• The PR introduces new usage patterns (external apps) that aren't covered by existing tests
• No examples of testing external app integration patterns
• Existing test files don't appear to cover the createClient usage patterns documented

Recommendation: In a future PR, consider adding example tests or integration guides for external apps using Base44 as a BaaS.

Additional Observations

1. Clarity improvement: The distinction between "Inside Base44 apps" vs "External apps" is much clearer now
2. Good examples: Each usage pattern has a complete, runnable code example
3. Consistent messaging: The changes align well with positioning Base44 as a backend service

Conclusion

This is a well-executed documentation update that improves the SDK's usability for external applications. The changes are safe, clear, and maintain backward compatibility. The PR achieves its goal of updating the client documentation for BaaS usage patterns.

Recommendation: ✅ Approve - The changes improve documentation clarity without introducing any risks.

[github-actions]

🚀 Package Preview Available!

---

Install this PR's preview build with npm:

npm i @base44-preview/sdk@0.8.18-pr.78.04eb7f2

Prefer not to change any import paths? Install using npm alias so your code still imports @base44/sdk:

npm i "@base44/sdk@npm:@base44-preview/sdk@0.8.18-pr.78.04eb7f2"

Or add it to your package.json dependencies:

{
  "dependencies": {
    "@base44/sdk": "npm:@base44-preview/sdk@0.8.18-pr.78.04eb7f2"
  }
}

• 📦 Preview Package: @base44-preview/sdk@0.8.18-pr.78.04eb7f2
• 🔗 View this commit on GitHub

---

_{Preview published to npm registry — try new features instantly!}

[claude]

Claude finished @wixysam's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Update Client Docs for BaaS Use

• Read and analyze README.md changes
• Review src/client.ts implementation changes
• Review src/client.types.ts type definitions
• Assess code quality and best practices
• Check for potential bugs or issues
• Evaluate performance considerations
• Identify security concerns
• Assess test coverage

Review Summary

This PR successfully updates the documentation to better support Base44 as a Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS). The changes are purely documentation improvements with no functional code changes.

✅ Code Quality and Best Practices

Strengths:

• Clear distinction between internal Base44 app usage and external app usage
• Well-structured documentation with practical examples
• Consistent terminology throughout ("BaaS", "backend", "external apps")
• Good use of TypeScript examples with proper imports
• Proper use of JSDoc @internal tags for properties that shouldn't be exposed publicly

Documentation improvements:

• The README now provides a clearer onboarding experience with separate sections for different use cases
• Added installation instructions for external apps
• Service role documentation properly warns about security considerations
• Examples show complete, runnable code snippets

✅ Potential Bugs or Issues

No bugs identified. The changes are documentation-only:

• All code changes in src/client.ts and src/client.types.ts are JSDoc comment updates
• No functional code modifications that could introduce bugs
• Type definitions remain unchanged, ensuring backward compatibility

✅ Performance Considerations

No performance impact. All changes are documentation-related:

• No runtime code modifications
• No changes to data structures or algorithms
• No new dependencies added
• Documentation builds happen at compile time, not runtime

✅ Security Concerns

Security is properly addressed:

• Service role token is correctly marked as @internal in types (client.types.ts:49-51)
• Clear documentation that service role is "only available in Base44-hosted backend functions"
• Good security guidance in the service role example
• The appId is properly documented as safe to expose for external apps

Minor suggestion: Consider adding a note in the external apps section about CORS configuration requirements when calling Base44 APIs from browser-based applications.

⚠️ Test Coverage

No tests added or updated. While this is acceptable for documentation-only changes, consider:

• The PR introduces new usage patterns (external apps) that aren't covered by existing tests
• No examples of testing external app integration patterns
• Consider adding integration test examples in a future PR

Recommendation: In a future PR, consider adding example tests or integration guides for external apps using Base44 as a BaaS.

Additional Observations

1. Improved clarity: The distinction between "Inside Base44 apps" vs "External apps" is much clearer
2. Comprehensive examples: Each usage pattern has a complete, self-contained code example
3. Consistent API surface: The same client API works across all contexts, making it easy to switch between them

Conclusion

This is a well-executed documentation update that improves the SDK's usability for external applications. The changes are safe, clear, and maintain backward compatibility.

Verdict: ✅ APPROVED - The documentation improvements enhance developer experience without introducing any risks.