remove project structure from readme

[kfirstri]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

🚀 Package Preview Available!

---

Install this PR's preview build with npm:

npm i @base44-preview/cli@0.0.1-pr.9.9888a05

Prefer not to change any import paths? Install using npm alias so your code still imports base44:

npm i "base44@npm:@base44-preview/cli@0.0.1-pr.9.9888a05"

Or add it to your package.json dependencies:

{
  "dependencies": {
    "base44": "npm:@base44-preview/cli@0.0.1-pr.9.9888a05"
  }
}

• 📦 Preview Package: @base44-preview/cli@0.0.1-pr.9.9888a05
• 🔗 View this commit on GitHub

---

_{Preview published to npm registry — try new features instantly!}

[claude]

PR Review: Remove Project Structure from README

Summary

This PR removes the project structure documentation section from the README.md file. The change is simple and clean, removing 27 lines of directory tree documentation.

Code Quality ✅

• Clean removal: The change is straightforward with no code modifications
• Formatting: Adds a blank line after the lint command (line 36), which improves readability
• No breaking changes: Only documentation is affected

Potential Issues ⚠️

1. Lost Documentation Value: The removed project structure section provided valuable information for:

   • New contributors understanding the codebase organization
   • Developers looking for where to add new features
   • Understanding the separation between core/ and cli/ modules

   Recommendation: Consider moving this structure documentation to a CONTRIBUTING.md or ARCHITECTURE.md file rather than completely removing it.

2. Incomplete README: The README now ends abruptly after the commands section. The removed content included:

   • License information (ISC)

   Issue: The License section should probably be restored, as it's important legal information.

3. Missing Context: Without the project structure, the README doesn't explain:

   • The purpose of the core/ vs cli/ module split
   • Where to find specific functionality (API client, schemas, commands, etc.)

Performance Considerations ✅

• N/A - Documentation only change

Security Concerns ✅

• No security implications

Test Coverage ✅

• N/A - Documentation only change

Recommendations

1. Restore License Section: Add back the license information at the end of the README
2. Alternative Documentation: Consider one of these approaches:
   • Create an ARCHITECTURE.md file with the project structure
   • Add a brief structure overview to a CONTRIBUTING.md file
   • Link to documentation in a docs folder
3. Add Project Description: The README could benefit from a brief explanation of the core/cli module architecture

Verdict

The technical execution is clean, but the removal of useful documentation without replacement may impact developer experience. Consider preserving this information in a more appropriate location rather than deleting it entirely.

Suggested Action: Add the license back and consider creating supplementary documentation files for the project structure.