-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
Ensemble Selection #27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…es up with during its run
…t of stuff in a silly way, so I deleted/refactored a bunch of code from the previous few days. Most notably, the ConfigurationRanker class was ditched. A lot of what it did, however, was refactored into ConfigurationCollection's static methods.
…y configurations they want in the output. Made some changes to the ranking system. Most notably, the ConfigurationRanker class is back, but looks different from the past version. I just got al of the static ranking methods in ConfigurationCollection and put them into a new class called ConfigurationRanker because it made more sense semantically.
…put order bug left to fix
…sometimes not match the N-best-configs feature output and/or smac. Turns out there's a bug on the smac trajectory parsing. I'll refactor that. Making this commit before touching it.
…idation, and ran a bunch of successful tests. Still lacking unit tests, gonna write them.
…and ConfigurationRanker classes
…orted configurations log to have SMAC's final incumbent as the first one in case of a tie
…toryParser bugfix
|
Thanks. I'm getting an exception when no configurations were evaluated: and a null pointer exception in another case: Could you have a look please? |
|
Hi Lars, Do you know which datasets/seed/constraints caused these exceptions? I might have fixed the issue but it would be safer to run autoweka with the same arguments again to confirm. |
|
I think I tried this with the yeast dataset from the Auto-WEKA paper. Presumably you tested with all of them to measure the performance improvement with ensembles? |
|
Hi Lars, |
|
Great, thanks! Do you have the performance comparison with and without ensembles as well? |
|
Not yet - I've done a few test runs, but not in a very methodical way. I'm writing a script to run on Parallel over the weekend, so that I can make some pretty graphs with more concrete measures =) |
|
No worries. I've run some small experiments myself and didn't see any improvement with ensembles, so I'm curious to see your experiments. |
|
Hi Oto, did you have a chance to look at running the experiments? I want to merge this, but would like to see some numbers on how much it improves first. |
|
Hi Lars, |
Trying something out with the temp files
No description provided.