Skip to content

TES-8: Change how videos are generated#10

Draft
austinjiann wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
phoebe/TES-8-run_20260319222012_iodfkx
Draft

TES-8: Change how videos are generated#10
austinjiann wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
phoebe/TES-8-run_20260319222012_iodfkx

Conversation

@austinjiann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Ticket

Summary

Run Summary

TES-8: Change how videos are generated

Changes Made

1. Updated video model to veo 3.1 (full quality)

  • File: backend/services/vertex_service.py (line 25)
  • Before: veo-3.1-fast-generate-001
  • After: veo-3.1-generate-001
  • The "fast" variant was replaced with the standard veo 3.1 model, which produces higher quality output suitable for realistic video generation.

2. Updated system prompt for realistic output

  • File: backend/utils/prompt_builder.py (lines 2-9)
  • Changed "creative" to "realistic" in the generation directive.
  • Replaced the generic style instruction ("visually engaging and dynamic, stay true to the style of the source material") with explicit realism instructions: photorealistic rendering, real-world physics, natural lighting/textures, cinematic live-action look, and an explicit directive to avoid cartoon/anime/illustrated styles.
  • Fixed a typo: "momvement" → "movement".

Testing

  • No automated test suite exists in this project (no pytest, jest, vitest, or test files found).
  • Python syntax validation passed for both modified files.
  • Frontend TypeScript compilation (tsc --noEmit) passed with no errors.

Changed Files

  • ackend/services/vertex_service.py
  • backend/utils/prompt_builder.py

Test Results

  • Passed: 2

  • Failed: 0

  • python3 -m py_compile backend/services/vertex_service.py — passed

  • python3 -m py_compile backend/utils/prompt_builder.py — passed

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Mar 19, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
flowboard Ready Ready Preview, Comment Mar 19, 2026 10:23pm

Request Review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant