Fix #180. Changed the symbols [] to instead use $& Fix #182 Changed conditionals testing to use testAssertEqual#181
Merged
Conversation
Aw1221
requested review from
Kristoffer-August,
MrLoverZ,
WannabeMO and
audio-engineer
as code owners
Aw1221
changed the title
WannabeMO
approved these changes
May 24, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A bit wacky solution but symbols like <> introduce ambugutiy for statements like print (numbers<2>) as it would not know whether we wanna print the boolean statement numbers<2 or array indeks numbers<2>