Skip to content

Improve project quality and stability#3

Draft
ashtanko wants to merge 8 commits intomainfrom
cursor/improve-project-quality-and-stability-39f0
Draft

Improve project quality and stability#3
ashtanko wants to merge 8 commits intomainfrom
cursor/improve-project-quality-and-stability-39f0

Conversation

@ashtanko
Copy link
Owner

Fixes a critical LRU ordering bug, adds new utility methods, and significantly enhances documentation and test coverage for the LruCache package.

The get() method's LRU ordering was incorrect, failing to move accessed items to the most recently used position. This PR corrects that behavior and introduces comprehensive improvements including new utility methods, extensive API and usage documentation, increased test coverage with benchmarks, and a CI/CD pipeline, transforming the package into a production-ready, high-quality caching solution.


Open in Cursor Open in Web

…tests

Co-authored-by: shtankopro <shtankopro@gmail.com>
@cursor
Copy link

cursor bot commented Aug 13, 2025

Cursor Agent can help with this pull request. Just @cursor in comments and I'll start working on changes in this branch.
Learn more about Cursor Agents

@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 5ff50291 95.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (5ff5029) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (7c4594f) 186 182 97.85%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#3) 40 38 95.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

@codacy-production
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Aug 13, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 5ff50291 95.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (5ff5029) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (8c750e5) 186 182 97.85%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#3) 40 38 95.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 13, 2025

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants