Make SRFI test program writing more reliable#1083
Merged
ashinn merged 1 commit intoashinn:masterfrom Feb 12, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Current main:
Tempfile writing fails, thinks Kawa does not support any SRFI's. With changes in this pull request.
|
Contributor
Author
|
Thank you! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request is related to #1078. It does not fix the whole thing but is a step into that direction.
Part of the problem for example with Kawa is that sometimes the SRFI checking code is not fully written into the tempfile.
This is weird as it is Chibi who is doing the writing.
Old implementation here:
chibi-scheme/lib/chibi/snow/commands.scm
Line 1894 in da20079
First putting the strings into list and then writing them out one by one seems more reliable than writing things out in a loop inside
with-output-to-file.