Conversation
…ling - Refactor message and file sending logic into separate handleMessages and handleFiles methods - Stream file uploads via io.Copy rather than loading the entire content into memory - Add centralized http.Client with timeout for all requests - Enhance error handling throughout by returning more descriptive and wrapped errors - Improve response validation for file and message uploads, checking HTTP status and parsing error details - Update tests to cover plain text messages, embed messages, file uploads, color conversion, and combined features - Add tests using assert.Error/assert.NoError and checking specific error messages - Simplify and clarify configuration validation logic Signed-off-by: appleboy <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
WalkthroughThe changes refactor the plugin to introduce a reusable HTTP client, modularize message and file sending logic, improve error handling, and optimize file uploads. The test suite is expanded with new, focused tests for messages, file uploads, color parsing, and integrated execution, enhancing coverage and clarity. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Plugin
participant HTTPServer
User->>Plugin: Exec(ctx)
Plugin->>Plugin: validate config
Plugin->>Plugin: handleMessages(ctx)
alt No messages configured
Plugin->>HTTPServer: Send default message via httpClient
HTTPServer-->>Plugin: HTTP response
else Messages configured
alt Color configured
Plugin->>HTTPServer: Send all messages as embeds via httpClient
HTTPServer-->>Plugin: HTTP response
else No color
loop For each message
Plugin->>HTTPServer: Send plain text message via httpClient
HTTPServer-->>Plugin: HTTP response
end
end
end
Plugin->>Plugin: handleFiles(ctx)
loop For each file
Plugin->>HTTPServer: Send file via httpClient (multipart upload)
HTTPServer-->>Plugin: HTTP response
end
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @appleboy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces significant architectural improvements to the plugin's messaging and file upload capabilities. By refactoring core functionalities, optimizing file handling for large payloads, and centralizing HTTP client management, the changes aim to enhance performance, reliability, and maintainability. A strong focus on comprehensive error handling and expanded test coverage ensures a more robust and predictable user experience.
Highlights
- Code Refactoring & Modularity: The core logic for sending messages and files has been refactored into dedicated methods,
handleMessagesandhandleFiles, improving code organization and readability within theExecfunction. - Streamlined File Uploads: File uploads now utilize
io.Copyto stream file content directly, eliminating the need to load entire files into memory. This significantly improves performance and reduces memory consumption for large files. - Centralized HTTP Client: A single
http.Clientwith a defined timeout (15 seconds) is now initialized once and reused across all HTTP requests for both message and file sending, promoting consistency and better resource management. - Enhanced Error Handling: Error handling has been significantly improved throughout the plugin. Errors are now more descriptive, often wrapped with context using
fmt.Errorf("%w", err), and response validation for both message and file uploads is more robust, checking HTTP status codes and parsing API error details from the response body. - Improved Configuration Validation: The
Config.validate()method has been simplified and clarified, making the validation logic for webhook URLs and IDs/tokens more straightforward. - Expanded Test Coverage: New and more specific test cases have been added to cover plain text messages, embed messages, file uploads, color conversion logic, and combined feature scenarios. Existing tests have been updated to use
assert.Errorandassert.NoErrorfor more precise error assertions.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
plugin_test.go (1)
141-179: Remove unnecessary sleep in testThe 1-second sleep at the beginning of the test appears to be unnecessary and will slow down test execution.
func TestExecWithAllFeatures(t *testing.T) { - time.Sleep(1 * time.Second) // Create a dummy file for testing
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
plugin.go(6 hunks)plugin_test.go(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint and Testing
plugin_test.go
[error] 133-133: TestColorConversion/invalid_hex failed: Not equal - expected 0 but got 16724530.
[error] 135-135: TestColorConversion/status_success failed: Not equal - expected 1752220 but got 1754624.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: ubuntu-latest @ Go 1.23
- GitHub Check: lint
- GitHub Check: build-docker
🔇 Additional comments (10)
plugin.go (8)
129-137: Good addition of shared HTTP clientAdding a reusable HTTP client to the Plugin struct is a solid improvement for connection pooling and consistent timeout handling.
141-159: Clean refactoring of validation logicThe simplified validation flow with early return and improved error message construction makes the code more readable and maintainable.
178-196: Excellent optimization for file uploadsThe switch from loading entire files into memory to streaming with
io.Copyis a significant improvement for handling large files. Proper resource cleanup and detailed error messages enhance reliability.
220-239: Well-structured refactoring of Exec methodThe initialization of a shared HTTP client with appropriate timeout and delegation to specialized methods improves code organization and maintainability.
241-287: Well-implemented message handling logicThe method correctly handles different message scenarios with appropriate grouping for embeds and immediate sending for plain text. Error messages provide clear context for debugging.
289-300: Clean file handling implementationSimple and effective iteration with proper error handling and context.
327-346: Improved error handling in SendFileExcellent enhancement with detailed error reporting that attempts to parse Discord's JSON error responses while gracefully handling non-JSON responses.
365-382: Correct handling of Discord webhook responsesThe check for both 200 and 204 status codes is correct for Discord webhooks. The error handling is consistent with SendFile and provides good debugging information.
plugin_test.go (2)
13-19: Improved test assertionsGood use of
assert.Errorand error message validation to ensure the correct error is returned.
21-108: Comprehensive test coverage for new functionalityExcellent addition of focused tests that cover plain text messages, embed messages, default templates, and file uploads. Each test is well-structured and validates specific functionality.
| func TestColorConversion(t *testing.T) { | ||
| tests := []struct { | ||
| name string | ||
| colorHex string | ||
| expectedInt int | ||
| buildStatus string | ||
| expectedFall int | ||
| }{ | ||
| {"valid hex", "#ffaa00", 16755200, "success", 1752220}, | ||
| {"invalid hex", "not-a-hex", 0, "failure", 16724530}, | ||
| {"status success", "", 0, "success", 1752220}, | ||
| {"status failure", "", 0, "failure", 16724530}, | ||
| {"status killed", "", 0, "killed", 16724530}, | ||
| {"status default", "", 0, "running", 16767280}, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // change color for embed message | ||
| plugin.Config.Color = "#4842f4" | ||
| plugin.Commit.Message = "Change embed color to #4842f4" | ||
| plugin.Clear() | ||
| err = plugin.Exec(context.Background()) | ||
| assert.Nil(t, err) | ||
| for _, tt := range tests { | ||
| t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { | ||
| p := Plugin{ | ||
| Config: Config{Color: tt.colorHex}, | ||
| Build: Build{Status: tt.buildStatus}, | ||
| } | ||
| if tt.colorHex != "" { | ||
| assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedInt, p.Color()) | ||
| } else { | ||
| assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedFall, p.Color()) | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect test expectations
The test expectations don't match the actual implementation behavior. According to the pipeline failures and the Color() method logic:
- When an invalid hex is provided, the method falls back to status-based colors, not 0
- The success color is
0x1ac600= 1754624, not 1752220
Apply this fix to correct the test expectations:
- {"valid hex", "#ffaa00", 16755200, "success", 1752220},
- {"invalid hex", "not-a-hex", 0, "failure", 16724530},
- {"status success", "", 0, "success", 1752220},
+ {"valid hex", "#ffaa00", 16755200, "success", 1754624},
+ {"invalid hex", "not-a-hex", 16724530, "failure", 16724530},
+ {"status success", "", 0, "success", 1754624},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func TestColorConversion(t *testing.T) { | |
| tests := []struct { | |
| name string | |
| colorHex string | |
| expectedInt int | |
| buildStatus string | |
| expectedFall int | |
| }{ | |
| {"valid hex", "#ffaa00", 16755200, "success", 1752220}, | |
| {"invalid hex", "not-a-hex", 0, "failure", 16724530}, | |
| {"status success", "", 0, "success", 1752220}, | |
| {"status failure", "", 0, "failure", 16724530}, | |
| {"status killed", "", 0, "killed", 16724530}, | |
| {"status default", "", 0, "running", 16767280}, | |
| } | |
| // change color for embed message | |
| plugin.Config.Color = "#4842f4" | |
| plugin.Commit.Message = "Change embed color to #4842f4" | |
| plugin.Clear() | |
| err = plugin.Exec(context.Background()) | |
| assert.Nil(t, err) | |
| for _, tt := range tests { | |
| t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { | |
| p := Plugin{ | |
| Config: Config{Color: tt.colorHex}, | |
| Build: Build{Status: tt.buildStatus}, | |
| } | |
| if tt.colorHex != "" { | |
| assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedInt, p.Color()) | |
| } else { | |
| assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedFall, p.Color()) | |
| } | |
| }) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| func TestColorConversion(t *testing.T) { | |
| tests := []struct { | |
| name string | |
| colorHex string | |
| expectedInt int | |
| buildStatus string | |
| expectedFall int | |
| }{ | |
| {"valid hex", "#ffaa00", 16755200, "success", 1754624}, | |
| {"invalid hex", "not-a-hex", 16724530, "failure", 16724530}, | |
| {"status success", "", 0, "success", 1754624}, | |
| {"status failure", "", 0, "failure", 16724530}, | |
| {"status killed", "", 0, "killed", 16724530}, | |
| {"status default", "", 0, "running", 16767280}, | |
| } | |
| for _, tt := range tests { | |
| t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { | |
| p := Plugin{ | |
| Config: Config{Color: tt.colorHex}, | |
| Build: Build{Status: tt.buildStatus}, | |
| } | |
| if tt.colorHex != "" { | |
| assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedInt, p.Color()) | |
| } else { | |
| assert.Equal(t, tt.expectedFall, p.Color()) | |
| } | |
| }) | |
| } | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Lint and Testing
[error] 133-133: TestColorConversion/invalid_hex failed: Not equal - expected 0 but got 16724530.
[error] 135-135: TestColorConversion/status_success failed: Not equal - expected 1752220 but got 1754624.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In plugin_test.go around lines 110 to 139, the test expectations for color
values are incorrect. Update the expectedInt and expectedFall values to match
the actual Color() method logic: for invalid hex inputs, expect the fallback
color based on build status instead of 0, and change the success color to
1754624 (0x1ac600) instead of 1752220. Adjust the test cases accordingly to
reflect these correct expected values.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request does a great job of refactoring the message and file sending logic. The move to streaming file uploads is a significant performance improvement, and the centralized HTTP client and enhanced error wrapping improve maintainability and robustness. The test suite has also been significantly improved with more focused, table-driven tests. I've found a few minor issues: a bug in one of the new tests, and a couple of inconsistencies in error message formatting that could be improved for better debugging. Overall, this is a high-quality refactoring.
| } | ||
| var jsonResponse map[string]interface{} | ||
| if err := json.Unmarshal(bodyBytes, &jsonResponse); err != nil { | ||
| return fmt.Errorf("failed to send file, status code: %d, body: %s", resp.StatusCode, string(bodyBytes)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current error message when JSON unmarshalling fails is helpful as it includes the response body, which is great for debugging. However, it doesn't wrap the underlying err from json.Unmarshal. This is inconsistent with other parts of the refactoring and the PR's goal of enhancing error handling with wrapped errors. Please consider wrapping the error to provide more context for debugging.
| return fmt.Errorf("failed to send file, status code: %d, body: %s", resp.StatusCode, string(bodyBytes)) | |
| return fmt.Errorf("failed to send file, status code: %d, body: %s: %w", resp.StatusCode, string(bodyBytes), err) |
| expectedFall int | ||
| }{ | ||
| {"valid hex", "#ffaa00", 16755200, "success", 1752220}, | ||
| {"invalid hex", "not-a-hex", 0, "failure", 16724530}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There appears to be a logic error in this test case. When an invalid hex color is provided, the Color() function is expected to fall back to using the build status to determine the color. For a "failure" status, it should return 16724530. However, the test currently expects 0.
Please correct the expected value to ensure the test accurately reflects the function's behavior.
| {"invalid hex", "not-a-hex", 0, "failure", 16724530}, | |
| {"invalid hex", "not-a-hex", 16724530, "failure", 16724530}, |
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Tests