Skip to content

Conversation

@nan2088
Copy link

@nan2088 nan2088 commented Dec 29, 2025

Related discussion here #357
Adds runtime overflow detection when converting unsigned 64-bit integers (uint64_t or size_t) to int64_t in TVM FFI Any.

128-bit signed integers (if exists) are not considered.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @nan2088, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a crucial runtime overflow detection mechanism within the TVM FFI's Any type conversion logic. It specifically targets conversions of large unsigned 64-bit integers (uint64_t or size_t) to int64_t, which previously could lead to silent data loss. By throwing an OverflowError when such a condition is met, the change ensures data integrity and forces developers to explicitly handle potential value truncations, making the system more robust and predictable.

Highlights

  • Overflow Check for Unsigned Integers: Implemented a runtime overflow check for uint64_t and size_t when they are converted to int64_t within the TypeTraits<Int>::CopyToAnyView function in TVM FFI.
  • Error Handling: Introduced an OverflowError exception that is thrown if an unsigned 64-bit integer value exceeds the maximum capacity of int64_t during conversion, preventing silent data truncation.
  • Test Coverage: Added a new test case to test_any.cc to specifically verify that the OverflowError is correctly thrown when an uint64_t value larger than INT64_MAX is assigned to an Any object.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a valuable overflow check when converting unsigned 64-bit integers to int64_t within the TVM FFI, preventing potential data corruption. The implementation in type_traits.h is clean, using if constexpr to ensure the check is only applied where necessary, with no performance impact on other types. The new test case in test_any.cc effectively validates this new safety feature. I have one minor suggestion for the test file to improve its portability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant