Merged
Conversation
`Vec`s but also one `MutableBuffer`.
github-actions
bot
added
parquet
alamb
approved these changes
Mar 31, 2026
Contributor
alamb
left a comment
alamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good -- thank you @Rafferty97
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
truncate(0)toclear#9593Rationale for this change
In a previous PR (#9593), I change instances of
truncate(0)toclear(). However, this breaks the testtest_truncate_with_poolatarrow-buffer/src/buffer/mutable.rs:1357, due to an inconsistency between the implementation oftruncateandclear. This PR fixes that test.What changes are included in this PR?
This PR copies a section of code related to the
poolfeature present intruncatebut absent inclear, fixing the failing unit test.Are these changes tested?
Yes.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.