Conversation
|
You have run out of free Bugbot PR reviews for this billing cycle. This will reset on January 27. To receive reviews on all of your PRs, visit the Cursor dashboard to activate Pro and start your 14-day free trial. |
Summary of ChangesHello @CyanM0un, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces comprehensive security rule definitions for the MybatisPlus framework. It aims to enhance the detection of SQL injection vulnerabilities by explicitly listing various MybatisPlus methods that can act as sensitive data sinks and defining a corresponding sanitizer function to prevent such attacks. This addition improves the overall security analysis capabilities for applications leveraging MybatisPlus. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new rule configuration file to support taint analysis for the MybatisPlus framework, aiming to detect SQL injection vulnerabilities. The configuration is comprehensive, covering many potentially vulnerable methods in MybatisPlus wrappers.
My review has identified a few critical issues with the sanitizer definition that would render it ineffective for most of the defined sinks. I've also found a sink definition that is missing a link to the sanitizer. Addressing these points will significantly improve the effectiveness of this new rule set.
| { | ||
| "id": "SANITIZER_1", | ||
| "sanitizerType": "FunctionCallSanitizer", | ||
| "sanitizerScenario": "SANITIZER.CONFIG_BY_FUNCTIONCALL", | ||
| "calleeType": "com.baomidou.mybatisplus.core.conditions.query.QueryWrapper", | ||
| "fsig": "checkSqlInjection" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The sanitizer definition has two critical issues that make it ineffective for most sinks:
-
Incorrect
sanitizerScenario: It's set toSANITIZER.CONFIG_BY_FUNCTIONCALL, which applies to the return value of a function. ThecheckSqlInjectionmethod returnsvoid, so this sanitizer will have no effect. It should beSANITIZER.VALIDATE_BY_FUNCTIONCALLto correctly mark the arguments passed to the validation function as sanitized. -
Too specific
calleeType: It's set tocom.baomidou.mybatisplus.core.conditions.query.QueryWrapper. This prevents the sanitizer from being applied to sinks onLambdaQueryWrapper,UpdateWrapper, andLambdaUpdateWrapper. ThecheckSqlInjectionmethod is defined in the superclasscom.baomidou.mybatisplus.core.conditions.AbstractWrapper. Using this more general type will allow the sanitizer to apply to all relevant wrapper classes.
| { | |
| "id": "SANITIZER_1", | |
| "sanitizerType": "FunctionCallSanitizer", | |
| "sanitizerScenario": "SANITIZER.CONFIG_BY_FUNCTIONCALL", | |
| "calleeType": "com.baomidou.mybatisplus.core.conditions.query.QueryWrapper", | |
| "fsig": "checkSqlInjection" | |
| } | |
| { | |
| "id": "SANITIZER_1", | |
| "sanitizerType": "FunctionCallSanitizer", | |
| "sanitizerScenario": "SANITIZER.VALIDATE_BY_FUNCTIONCALL", | |
| "calleeType": "com.baomidou.mybatisplus.core.conditions.AbstractWrapper", | |
| "fsig": "checkSqlInjection" | |
| } |
| { | ||
| "args": [ | ||
| "0" | ||
| ], | ||
| "attribute": "JavaSQLi", | ||
| "calleeType": "com.baomidou.mybatisplus.extension.plugins.pagination.Page", | ||
| "fsig": "addOrder" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The sink definition for com.baomidou.mybatisplus.extension.plugins.pagination.Page.addOrder is missing the sanitizerIds property. This method can be a vector for SQL injection if it receives tainted input for ordering columns (e.g., via OrderItem). It should be associated with the defined sanitizer to ensure that tainted inputs are detected.
{
"args": [
"0"
],
"attribute": "JavaSQLi",
"calleeType": "com.baomidou.mybatisplus.extension.plugins.pagination.Page",
"fsig": "addOrder",
"sanitizerIds": [
"SANITIZER_1"
]
}
No description provided.