Skip to content

Conversation

@billf
Copy link

@billf billf commented Oct 30, 2025

No description provided.

@billf
Copy link
Author

billf commented Oct 30, 2025

This change is part of the following stack:

Change managed by git-spice.

@billf billf requested a review from Copilot October 30, 2025 19:54
@billf billf self-assigned this Oct 30, 2025
@billf billf added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Oct 30, 2025
@billf billf marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2025 19:54
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors the API response handling by converting a named struct type (apiResponse) into an anonymous inline struct. The change eliminates the standalone type definition and embeds the structure directly where it's used.

Key Changes:

  • Removed the apiResponse type definition
  • Replaced it with an anonymous struct defined inline within the do method

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +160 to 168
r := struct {
Result string `json:"result"`
Message string `json:"message"`
Data any `json:"data"`
Code int `json:"code"`
Fields map[string]any `json:"fields"`
}{
Data: data,
}
Copy link

Copilot AI Oct 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] Converting apiResponse from a named type to an anonymous struct reduces code reusability and makes it harder to test. If this response structure is used in multiple places or needs to be mocked for testing, consider keeping it as a named type. Additionally, the inline comment (lines 158-159) duplicates information that was better expressed as a type-level comment on the original struct.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@billf billf marked this pull request as draft October 30, 2025 19:56
billf added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2025
Add `testing/doc.go` with comprehensive package documentation covering:
- Test data builders with fluent API examples
- FakeClient for integration-style tests
- MockClient for unit tests with function fields

The documentation appears in `go doc` output and helps users understand
the package's purpose and usage patterns.

Resolves todo #8: testing package missing package-level documentation.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
billf added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2025
Add `testing/doc.go` with comprehensive package documentation covering:
- Test data builders with fluent API examples
- FakeClient for integration-style tests
- MockClient for unit tests with function fields

The documentation appears in `go doc` output and helps users understand
the package's purpose and usage patterns.

Resolves todo #8: testing package missing package-level documentation.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
billf added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2025
Add `testing/doc.go` with comprehensive package documentation covering:
- Test data builders with fluent API examples
- FakeClient for integration-style tests
- MockClient for unit tests with function fields

The documentation appears in `go doc` output and helps users understand
the package's purpose and usage patterns.

Resolves todo #8: testing package missing package-level documentation.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

good first issue Good for newcomers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants