Fix misleading usage of coroutines and suspend functions #55
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Switching to IO Dispatcher from the ViewModel classes instead of where the blocking call happens breaks the "main-safe" convention of Kotlin coroutines as well as the dispatching responsibility.
I migrated the suspending call down to where it is actually needed: in the
LocalFileProviderImpl.Also cleanup the unnecessary manual buffering (for copying files/streams) as Kotlin's
InputStream.copyTo()already does it with a default 8kiB buffer.And to keep the cancelable tasks (that was previously canceling the global IO dispatcher entirely), I've added two
Jobinstances in theCreationViewModelthat can be canceled as needed.