Skip to content

alsoadarsh/challenged-kitchen-cost-analysis

Repository files navigation

Challenged Kitchen Co. — Make vs. Buy Analysis

Type Tools Status

Live site: https://alsoadarsh.github.io/challenged-kitchen-cost-analysis


The Decision

Challenged Kitchen Co. is launching a new product line and must choose between building in-house production or outsourcing manufacturing. The choice locks in unit economics for four years.


Recommendation: In-House Production

Metric In-House Outsource
NPV (4-year) $1,304,949 $1,089,212
NPV Advantage $215,737
Year 1 Cash Flow $385,980 $243,320
Cost per Unit $7 variable $18 fixed
Break-Even 3,030 units/yr No fixed costs

Year 1 projected demand is 14,000 units — break-even is at 3,030. The investment pays back in Year 1 under virtually any realistic demand scenario.


Monte Carlo Validation

1,000 iterations varying Year 1 demand (mean 14,000, SD 1,000) and annual growth rate (mean 20%, SD 3%):

  • In-house preferred in 100% of iterations
  • In-house NPV range: $878K–$1.75M
  • Outsource NPV range: $805K–$1.38M
  • NPV advantage consistent at $154K–$220K across all iterations

Key Parameters

Parameter Value
Selling price $40/unit (fixed 4 years)
In-house variable cost $7/unit
Outsource cost $18/unit
Initial investment $400,000
Depreciation $100,000/year (straight-line)
Year 1 demand 14,000 units
Annual growth rate 20%
Tax rate 21%
Discount rate 7%

Files

File Description
index.html GitHub Pages case study site
Challenged_Kitchen_Memo.pdf Full business memorandum
Challenged_Kitchen_Model.xlsx Excel financial model with Monte Carlo simulation

Author

Adarsh Shukla MS Business Analytics · University of Dayton LinkedIn · GitHub

About

NPV analysis comparing in-house vs outsourced production — financial modeling, Monte Carlo simulation, strategic recommendation

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Languages