add regular checks

[bart1]

No description provided.

[PietrH]

Test coverage failed, strange that R CMD CHECK didn't trip

[bart1]

Test coverage failed, strange that R CMD CHECK didn't trip

The error is a 429 on dutch data so probably not related to the package and retesting would resolve

[bart1]

@peterdesmet any objections to include this?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.41%. Comparing base (2379fc1) to head (f5f48eb).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #108      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.44%   92.41%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        1787     1781       -6     
==========================================
- Hits         1652     1646       -6     
  Misses        135      135              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[peterdesmet]

No objection to run regular checks. I wonder how the reporting works though: will we just have to see from a badge in the README?

[bart1]

I think I will also get emails for failed runs ?