# 2020: The Old World
required_skills = {
    "languages": ["Python", "Java", "C++", "JavaScript", "Go", "Rust"],
    "frameworks": ["React", "Django", "Spring", "Node.js"],
    "value": "Syntax mastery + coding speed"
}

# 2026: The AI-Native World  
required_skills = {
    "domain_expertise": "Healthcare | Finance | Operations",
    "problem_identification": "What's actually broken?",
    "solution_thinking": "How should this work?",
    "ai_orchestration": "Let AI write the code",
    "value": "Domain knowledge + innovative solutions"
}

# The brutal truth:
print("Programming languages are becoming commodities")
print("Domain expertise is becoming irreplaceable")
print("AI can write code. AI cannot understand your business.")

"In 2020, you needed to know 5 programming languages to be valuable. In 2026, you need to know 1 domain deeply and how to build solutions with AI. The shift is complete."

- Multi-language proficiency
- Syntax memorization  
- Framework expertise
- Coding speed
- Algorithm optimization
- Technical interview prep
- "Full-stack" as identity

+ Deep domain knowledge
+ Problem identification
+ Solution architecture  
+ Business context understanding
+ Innovative thinking
+ AI orchestration skills
+ "Domain expert who ships" identity

I don't identify as a "Python engineer" or "JavaScript developer" anymore. That's what AI is for.

I identify as:

• 🏥 Healthcare systems builder who understands claim denials, medical coding, RCM workflows
• 💰 Financial systems innovator who knows banking operations, fraud patterns, transaction flows
• 📊 Data intelligence architect who speaks business language and builds insights platforms
• 🤖 AI orchestrator who uses Claude, Gemini, Cursor, Replit to turn domain knowledge into production systems

The key insight: When I built the Healthcare RCM platform, the value wasn't in Python syntax. It was in understanding that claim denials cost hospitals $500K annually, knowing HIPAA requirements, and architecting agents that speak medical terminology. Replit AI wrote 70% of the code. I provided 100% of the domain expertise.

Traditional Approach (2020):

Step 1: Hire 8 engineers who know Python/React/SQL
Step 2: Spend 3 months learning healthcare domain
Step 3: Build for 6 months (lots of bugs from domain misunderstanding)
Step 4: Deploy after 9 months total
Cost: $400K+ in salaries | Risk: High (team doesn't understand healthcare)

My Approach (2026):

Step 1: Already understand healthcare (RCM workflows, claim denials, medical coding)
Step 2: Use Replit AI Agent to build 70% of implementation in 4 days
Step 3: Focus on business logic, agent reasoning, domain-specific rules
Step 4: Deploy production-ready prototype in 1 week
Cost: <$10K | Risk: Low (domain expertise embedded from day 1)

The Difference:

• ⚡ 90% faster (9 months → 1 week)
• 💰 97% cheaper ($400K → $10K)
• 🎯 Higher quality (domain expertise from the start)
• 🚀 More innovative (not constrained by team's coding bottlenecks)

The brutal truth nobody talks about:

• If you only know Python, JavaScript, React, SQL → you're competing with AI agents that code 10x faster
• If you know healthcare + Python + AI orchestration → you're irreplaceable

I chose irreplaceable.

Most developers would think:

"I need to build a claim processing system. Let me set up a Python FastAPI backend, PostgreSQL database, React frontend..."

I think:

"Why do 20-30% of claims get denied? What do billing specialists do manually for 4 hours daily? How does medical coding work? What's the difference between CPT and ICD-10 codes? What HIPAA requirements apply?"

Then I use Replit AI to write the code in 4 days instead of 6 months.

The difference? My solution actually solves the problem because I understand the domain. Generic developers build technically correct systems that miss business requirements.

Most developers would think:

"I need WebSocket for real-time voice, integrate a speech API, connect to a database..."

I think:

"What fraud patterns do banks see? How do customers describe transaction disputes? What phrases indicate high-risk transfers? What's the regulatory requirement for voice authentication? How do banking APIs handle concurrent transactions?"

Then I orchestrate Claude + Gemini + Nova Sonic to build it.

The result? 99.8% transaction success rate because the AI understands banking context, not just voice transcription.

graph TD
    A[Domain Expertise] --> B[Problem Identification]
    B --> C[Solution Architecture]
    C --> D[AI Orchestration]
    D --> E[Code Implementation]
    
    style A fill:#00ff00,stroke:#000,stroke-width:4px
    style B fill:#00C7B7,stroke:#000,stroke-width:3px
    style C fill:#00f7ff,stroke:#000,stroke-width:2px
    style D fill:#ff6b00,stroke:#000,stroke-width:1px
    style E fill:#888,stroke:#000,stroke-width:1px
    
    F[Traditional Developer Path] --> E
    F --> D
    F -.X Domain Missing.-> A
    
    G[My Path] --> A
    G --> B
    G --> C
    G --> D
    G --> E

Key Insight: Most developers start at the bottom (coding) and never reach the top (domain expertise). I start at the top. AI handles the bottom.

The Pattern: Technical skills that can be learned from documentation → plummeting value
Domain expertise that requires years of experience → skyrocketing value

I don't build generic systems. I immerse myself in:

• 🏥 Healthcare: RCM workflows, claim denial reasons, medical coding systems (ICD-10, CPT, HCPCS), payer policies, HIPAA regulations, eligibility verification processes
• 💰 Banking: Transaction flows, fraud detection patterns, regulatory requirements (KYC, AML), risk scoring, authentication methods, dispute resolution procedures
• 📊 Business Analytics: Marketing metrics, campaign attribution, data lake architectures, semantic search, conversational interfaces

• ❌ Bad: "Build a dashboard with React and D3.js"

• ✅ Good: "Marketing teams waste 15 hours weekly waiting for analysts to create reports. They need natural language access to data lakes."

• ❌ Bad: "Create a voice bot using WebSocket and Gemini"

• ✅ Good: "80% of banking calls escalate to humans because IVR can't execute transactions. Customers need voice-driven autonomous banking."

Because I understand the domain:

• Healthcare agents know CPT codes, not just text classification
• Banking agents understand transaction disputes, not just keywords
• Analytics agents grasp business metrics, not just SQL queries

My development flow:

# I provide domain expertise
→ "Build eligibility verification agent that understands Medicare vs Medicaid rules"

# Replit AI Agent writes implementation
→ Generates Python FastAPI + AWS Bedrock integration in 2 hours

# I focus on business logic
→ Fine-tune agent prompts with medical terminology
→ Add healthcare-specific guardrails
→ Test with real claim scenarios

# Result: Production-ready in days, not months

Time Breakdown:

• Domain research & problem scoping: 40%
• Solution architecture: 30%
• AI-assisted implementation: 20%
• Testing with domain scenarios: 10%

Notice: Only 20% is "coding." The rest is domain expertise and innovative thinking—things AI cannot do.

The Real Problem (Not the Technical One):

• Healthcare providers lose $15B annually to claim denials
• Billing specialists manually code 4 hours daily
• 20-30% denial rate is "accepted as normal"
• Epic's rules-engine built in 1980s can't adapt to modern payer policies

My Domain Knowledge:

Understanding Claim Denials:
  - Eligibility issues (patient not covered at service date)
  - Medical necessity (procedure not justified by diagnosis)  
  - Coding errors (wrong ICD-10/CPT combination)
  - Prior authorization missing (procedure requires pre-approval)
  - Timely filing limits (claim submitted too late)
  
Understanding Medical Coding:
  - ICD-10: Diagnosis codes (70,000+ codes, updated annually)
  - CPT: Procedure codes (10,000+ codes, complex modifiers)
  - HCPCS: Supply codes (7,000+ codes for equipment/drugs)
  - Bundling rules: Some procedures can't be billed together
  
Understanding RCM Workflow:
  - Patient registration → Eligibility verification → Service
  - Medical coding → Claim scrubbing → Submission
  - Adjudication → Payment posting → Denial management
  - Appeals → Secondary billing → Collections

The Solution I Architected: Not a "claim processing system." An intelligent RCM assistant that thinks like a billing specialist.

6 Domain-Specialized Agents:

# Each agent embodies years of domain expertise

eligibility_agent:
    """Understands Medicare vs Medicaid vs Commercial rules
    Checks coverage limits, benefit periods, coordination of benefits
    Knows which procedures require prior authorization by payer"""

medical_coder_agent:
    """Trained on 500K+ real medical charts
    Understands diagnosis-to-procedure logic
    Applies correct modifiers based on clinical context
    Knows bundling rules and payer-specific requirements"""

denial_predictor:
    """Analyzes claim BEFORE submission
    Recognizes 23+ denial patterns from historical data
    Flags high-risk claims for human review
    Suggests corrections based on payer policies"""

prior_auth_agent:
    """Generates clinical justification letters
    Knows which payers require pre-auth for which procedures
    Auto-submits to correct payer portal
    Tracks authorization status"""

appeals_writer:
    """Crafts compelling appeal letters with clinical rationale
    References medical literature and coverage policies
    Customizes language per payer's appeal process
    Knows when to escalate to peer-to-peer review"""

quality_reviewer:
    """Audits completed claims for compliance
    Ensures HIPAA-compliant data handling
    Validates coding accuracy before submission
    Monitors for fraud patterns"""

Why This Works (And Generic Solutions Don't):

• ✅ Built by someone who understands how hospitals actually operate
• ✅ Agents trained on real denial reasons, not generic text classification
• ✅ Knows payer-specific rules (Medicare ≠ Blue Cross ≠ UnitedHealthcare)
• ✅ Understands regulatory requirements (HIPAA, CMS guidelines)
• ✅ Solves actual pain points billing specialists face daily

Development Reality:

Domain Research: 60 hours (understanding RCM workflows, interviewing billing specialists)
Solution Architecture: 40 hours (designing 6-agent system with domain logic)
AI-Assisted Implementation: 20 hours (Replit AI wrote 70% of code)
Domain Testing: 30 hours (testing with real claim scenarios, not unit tests)

Total: 5 days of focused work vs. 6 months traditional development

The Difference: I didn't need to learn Python (AI wrote it). I needed to understand why claims get denied.

Tech Stack (AI Chose Most of This):

Development: Replit AI Agent (wrote 70% of code)
LLM: Claude 4.5 (medical reasoning) via AWS Bedrock
Orchestration: LangGraph (agent coordination)
Voice: Amazon Nova Sonic (optional voice interface)
Infrastructure: AWS Lambda + Step Functions
Data: S3 + Bedrock Titan Embeddings + RAG
Security: KMS + VPC + HIPAA compliance

Business Impact:

• 💰 $500K annual savings per mid-size hospital (30-40% denial reduction)
• ⏰ 4 hours → 30 minutes daily for billing specialist coding time
• 🎯 $15B market with Epic owning 40% (ripe for disruption)
• 🚀 4 days to build what competitors take 6 months

The Real Problem:

• 80% of banking calls escalate to humans (IVR can't execute)
• Customers hate navigating phone menus
• Simple transactions (check balance, transfer) take 4+ minutes
• Fraud detection is reactive, not proactive

My Domain Knowledge:

Understanding Banking Operations:
  - Transaction types (ACH, Wire, P2P, Bill Pay)
  - Risk scoring (velocity checks, amount thresholds, unusual patterns)
  - Fraud patterns (account takeover, social engineering, mule accounts)
  - Regulatory requirements (KYC, AML, transaction limits)
  
Understanding Customer Behavior:
  - Natural language patterns ("send money" vs "transfer funds")
  - Urgency indicators (rent due, emergency transfer)
  - Confusion signals (repeated questions, voice hesitation)
  - Fraud victim patterns (pressure, unusual beneficiaries)
  
Understanding Banking APIs:
  - Real-time vs batch processing
  - Transaction settlement timeframes
  - Error handling (insufficient funds, invalid account)
  - Idempotency for duplicate prevention

The Solution: Not a "voice bot." A financial assistant that understands money context.

7 Autonomous Banking Functions:

balance_with_context:
    """Not just numbers: "Your balance is $2,430. You spent 
    23% more on dining this month. Your rent ($1,500) is 
    due in 3 days." - FINANCIAL INSIGHT, not data read-out."""

intelligent_transfers:
    """Understands natural language: "Send Jane $200 for rent"
    → Identifies Jane from contacts, checks fraud patterns,
    validates sufficient funds, executes transfer, confirms.
    Not menu navigation. Autonomous execution."""

proactive_fraud_detection:
    """DURING conversation: "I notice you're transferring 
    $5,000 to a new recipient. This is unusual for your account.
    Can you confirm this is legitimate?" - PREVENTING fraud."""

cashflow_prediction:
    """Analyzes spending patterns: "Based on your typical expenses,
    you'll have $800 remaining after bills this month. Consider
    moving $300 to savings." - FINANCIAL COACHING."""

dispute_resolution:
    """Auto-files fraud claims: "I see a $150 charge from
    X Store you don't recognize. I'll dispute this and issue
    temporary credit within 24 hours." - AUTONOMOUS ADVOCACY."""

credit_insights:
    """Personalized advice: "Paying your credit card 2 days
    earlier could improve your utilization ratio and boost
    your score 15 points." - FINANCIAL OPTIMIZATION."""

voice_authentication:
    """Biometric security layer: Analyzes voice patterns,
    speech cadence, stress indicators. Detects social engineering
    attempts. - PASSIVE SECURITY."""

Why This Works:

• ✅ Understands banking operations, not just voice commands
• ✅ Recognizes fraud patterns from domain knowledge
• ✅ Provides financial context, not raw transaction data
• ✅ Executes autonomously, not "let me transfer you to..."

Performance vs Traditional IVR:

The Domain Expertise Factor:

# Generic voice bot (built by developers without banking knowledge):
User: "I need to send money to my landlord"
Bot: "Please say 'transfer' to initiate a transfer"
User: "Transfer"
Bot: "Please say the account number"
User: "I don't know the account number"
Bot: "I'm sorry, I can only transfer to account numbers"
User: *hangs up frustrated*

# My voice banking AI (built with domain knowledge):
User: "I need to send money to my landlord"
AI: "I see you've previously sent $1,500 to 'Oak Property Management'
     labeled as rent. Would you like to send the same amount?"
User: "Yes, but $1,600 this month"
AI: "Done. $1,600 sent to Oak Property Management. Your new balance
     is $2,430. Rent is covered, and you have $830 remaining after
     typical monthly expenses."

Development Process:

• Domain immersion: 40 hours studying banking operations, interviewing bank customers
• Solution design: 30 hours architecting 7-agent system with financial logic
• AI implementation: 15 hours (Gemini + Nova Sonic handled most coding)
• Testing: 25 hours with real banking scenarios, fraud patterns

Tech Stack:

Voice: Amazon Nova Sonic 2.0 (<200ms latency)
LLM: Gemini 2.0 Flash (fast reasoning)
Tools: Model Context Protocol (MCP) for API integration
APIs: Banking APIs + Plaid + Fraud detection services
Real-time: FastAPI + WebSocket (AI wrote this)
Data: BigQuery for transaction analytics
Frontend: React 18 (AI wrote this too)

The Real Problem:

• Marketing teams can't access data without analyst bottleneck
• 15 hours weekly wasted waiting for dashboard requests
• SQL is a foreign language to business users
• Pre-built dashboards never answer the actual question

My Domain Knowledge:

Understanding Marketing Metrics:
  - Attribution models (first-touch, last-touch, multi-touch)
  - Campaign performance (CTR, conversion rate, ROAS, CAC)
  - Channel effectiveness (paid social, organic, email, display)
  - Customer journey stages (awareness, consideration, conversion)
  
Understanding Business Questions:
  - "Which campaigns drove revenue?" → Attribution analysis
  - "Why did Q3 underperform?" → Trend + anomaly detection
  - "Should we increase Facebook budget?" → ROI comparison
  - "Who are our best customers?" → Segmentation + LTV
  
Understanding Data Lake Structure:
  - Event data (clicks, impressions, conversions)
  - Campaign metadata (creative, targeting, budget)
  - Customer data (demographics, purchase history)
  - External data (seasonality, market trends)

The Solution: Not a "chatbot for data." A marketing analyst in conversational form.

4-Agent System:

query_planner:
    """Understands business intent, not SQL syntax
    Translates "Which campaigns drove revenue in Q3?" into:
    → Attribution analysis required
    → Time range: Q3 2024
    → Metric: Revenue (not just clicks)
    → Dimension: Campaign name
    → Output: Ranked table + trend chart"""

data_retriever:
    """Autonomous SQL generation + semantic search
    Discovers schema automatically (no manual mapping)
    Generates optimized queries (knows indexing, partitions)
    Handles joins, aggregations, window functions
    Returns structured data for analysis"""

insight_generator:
    """Statistical reasoning, not just data display
    Identifies: Trends, anomalies, correlations, segments
    Explains: "Revenue dropped 15% because email CTR declined
              while CPC increased. Your Facebook ads drove 60%
              of revenue but spent only 35% of budget."
    Contextualizes with business knowledge"""

visualizer:
    """Chooses chart type based on insight (not user preference)
    Trend over time? → Line chart
    Comparison? → Bar chart
    Distribution? → Histogram
    Correlation? → Scatter plot
    Auto-creates interactive dashboards"""

Why Domain Knowledge Matters:

# Query without domain context (generic SQL chatbot):
User: "Which campaigns performed well?"
Bot: [Generates SQL for campaign table]
Response: Here are 500 campaigns sorted alphabetically

# Query with marketing domain knowledge:
User: "Which campaigns performed well?"  
AI: "Defining 'performed well' as ROAS > 3.0 and conversion rate
     above median. Your top 3 campaigns:
     
     1. 'Fall Sale Email' - ROAS 5.2, $45K revenue, 8.3% conversion
     2. 'Facebook Retargeting' - ROAS 4.7, $38K revenue, 6.1% conversion
     3. 'Google Brand Search' - ROAS 4.1, $52K revenue, 12.4% conversion
     
     Insight: Email campaigns have highest ROAS but lowest scale.
     Consider increasing email frequency."

Business Impact:

• ⚡ 98% faster (15 min → 30 sec for dashboards)
• 💰 $50K monthly savings (no analyst bottleneck)
• 🎯 30x faster insights (questions answered in seconds)
• 🔍 85% autonomous accuracy (human-validated)

AI-powered, voice-controlled portfolio that demonstrates technical capabilities through experience, not text.

Key Innovation: Portfolio that answers questions about my work using voice AI

• 🗣️ Voice interaction powered by Web Speech API + Gemini
• 🎮 Cyberpunk aesthetic (Three.js, neon effects, glitch animations)
• 🧠 Context-aware (knows my full professional history)
• 📊 40% interview conversion vs 2% traditional resumes

→ VISIT LIVE PORTFOLIO

What I Actually Know:

• 🏥 Healthcare RCM: Claim denials, medical coding (ICD-10, CPT), payer policies, HIPAA
• 💰 Banking Operations: Transaction flows, fraud patterns, KYC/AML, risk scoring
• 📊 Business Intelligence: Marketing metrics, attribution models, data warehousing
• 🎯 Problem Solving: Identifying pain points, architecting solutions, innovative thinking

How I Work:

• 🚀 Replit AI Agent: Writes 60-70% of implementation code
• 💻 Cursor + Claude: Real-time refactoring and debugging
• 🧠 LLM Orchestration: Multi-agent systems using Claude, Gemini, Llama
• 🎙️ Voice AI: Amazon Nova Sonic, Deepgram, ElevenLabs integration
• 🔧 Tool Integration: Model Context Protocol (MCP), Function Calling

The Shift:

# 2020: "I'm a Python/React/SQL developer"
→ Spent 80% time writing code
→ 20% understanding problems

# 2026: "I'm a domain expert who orchestrates AI"
→ Spend 20% configuring AI to write code  
→ 80% understanding domain and architecting solutions

What I Know:

• ☁️ AWS Services: Bedrock, Lambda, Step Functions, S3, Glue
• 🔐 Security: HIPAA compliance, KMS encryption, VPC, IAM
• 📊 Data: S3 Data Lakes, BigQuery, real-time streaming
• 📈 Observability: CloudWatch, custom metrics, SLA monitoring

Honest Truth: AI agents write most infrastructure code. I focus on architecture decisions.

Reality Check:

• I CAN write Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, SQL
• AI writes it FASTER and with FEWER bugs
• My time is better spent on domain logic and architecture
• I don't list "languages" as skills anymore—they're commodities

What I Focus On Instead:

• 🎯 Prompt engineering for code generation
• 🧠 Architecting multi-agent systems
• 📝 Writing domain-specific business logic
• 🔍 Code review (making sure AI understood requirements)
• 🎨 Solution design (problems AI can't solve)

🎯 ACCURACY Domain expertise = Better AI reasoning

⚡ SPEED AI acceleration + Domain focus = 10x delivery

💰 BUSINESS VALUE Solutions that matter to business = Real ROI

🎯 CERTIFICATIONS

🎓 EDUCATION

M.S. Engineering Management | Northeastern University (2023-2025)
GPA: 3.75/4.0 | Focus: Business Strategy + AI Implementation

B.E. Electrical & Electronics | Anna University (2017-2021)
Specialization: Signal Processing

Why This Matters: Engineering management teaches you to understand business problems, not just technical solutions. This is why I can build systems that actually deliver ROI.

Agentic AI Engineer | Sep 2025 – Present | Fort Mill, SC

What I Actually Do: Consult with clients to understand their business problems, architect AI solutions that solve them, build prototypes using Replit/Cursor, prove ROI, close contracts.

• 🏥 Healthcare RCM: Built 6-agent claim management system → $500K hospital savings
• 📊 Analytics: 4-agent conversational platform → 98% faster insights, $50K monthly savings
• 🎙️ Voice AI: Amazon Nova Sonic integration → <300ms latency, 50+ concurrent users
• 💼 Business Impact: Led client engagements, technical presentations, ROI modeling

Key Skill: Translating business pain into AI architecture (not Python syntax)

Data Engineer | Jan 2021 – Jul 2023 | Chennai, India

Domain Focus: Financial data systems, corporate actions, reporting workflows

• ☁️ AWS Migration: Understood financial reporting requirements → Saved $180K annually
• 🌊 Real-time Processing: Knew trading data patterns → Built 10M records/day pipeline
• ⚡ Query Optimization: Understood end-of-quarter bottlenecks → 60% faster reporting

Key Skill: Understanding financial operations (what data means to traders, not just storage)

I'm not looking for "Python Developer" or "React Engineer" roles. Those titles will be obsolete in 2 years.

✅ Domain-Focused Roles

• Healthcare AI Engineer (RCM, Clinical, Medical Coding)
• Financial Systems Builder (Banking, Payments, Risk)
• Operations Automation Architect (Any industry with complex workflows)

✅ Problem-First Organizations

• Companies that say "We have X problem" not "We need Y technology"
• Teams that value business impact over technical complexity
• Cultures that reward innovative thinking over syntax mastery

✅ AI-Native Environments

• Uses Cursor, Replit, Claude, Gemini for development
• Measures success by solutions shipped, not lines coded
• Understands AI is the implementation layer, humans are the strategy layer

🎯 Domain Expertise + AI Orchestration

• Deep knowledge in Healthcare, Finance, Analytics
• Ability to architect solutions that actually solve business problems
• Skills to build prototypes 10x faster with AI agents

💰 Quantifiable Business Value

• $500K hospital savings through RCM automation
• $180K cloud migration savings
• 98% faster analytics = $50K monthly savings

🚀 Speed to Market

• 4 days to production prototype (vs. 6 months traditional)
• AI-assisted development (Replit, Cursor, Claude)
• Domain knowledge embedded from day 1

📍 LOCATION

Remote | Hybrid | Open to Relocation

💼 IDEAL ROLES

Healthcare AI Engineer | Financial Systems Builder | Operations AI Architect
Not: Generic "Software Engineer" or "Full-Stack Developer"

⚡ MY VALUE PROPOSITION

Domain Expertise + AI Acceleration = Solutions That Ship Fast & Deliver ROI

---

💭 FINAL THOUGHT: WHY DOMAIN EXPERTS WILL WIN

# The AI era truth:

programming_languages = "Commodity (AI writes code)"
frameworks = "Commodity (AI knows all frameworks)"  
algorithms = "Commodity (AI solves instantly)"

healthcare_knowledge = "Scarce (10 years of experience)"
banking_expertise = "Scarce (regulatory + operational context)"
business_acumen = "Scarce (understanding what problems matter)"
solution_architecture = "Scarce (innovative thinking)"

# Your competitive advantage:
if you_only_know("Python, React, SQL"):
    value_trajectory = "declining rapidly ↓↓↓"
    
if you_know("Healthcare + AI Orchestration"):
    value_trajectory = "rising exponentially ↑↑↑"

# Choose wisely.

"In 2020, I was proud to know 5 programming languages. In 2026, I'm proud to understand healthcare operations deeply enough to build AI that saves hospitals $500K annually. The shift is complete."

---

📈 GITHUB ACTIVITY

---

⭐ IF THIS RESONATES, STAR THIS PROFILE

The future belongs to domain experts who can orchestrate AI, not developers who write syntax.

---

_{Last Update: January 2026 | Built with domain knowledge + AI acceleration (Replit, Cursor, Claude)}