Skip to content

Update server.py commented out unsupported field#56

Open
Polarbear278 wants to merge 1 commit intoahujasid:mainfrom
Polarbear278:patch-1
Open

Update server.py commented out unsupported field#56
Polarbear278 wants to merge 1 commit intoahujasid:mainfrom
Polarbear278:patch-1

Conversation

@Polarbear278
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Polarbear278 Polarbear278 commented Jan 17, 2026

User description

Description field no longer supported, causing image to not build.

Commented it out to get script working


PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Comment out unsupported description parameter in FastMCP initialization

  • Add newline at end of file for proper formatting


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["FastMCP initialization"] -->|Remove unsupported field| B["Comment out description parameter"]
  B -->|Fix formatting| C["Add newline at EOF"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Bug fix
server.py
Comment unsupported description field and fix EOF               

MCP_Server/server.py

  • Comment out the description parameter in FastMCP() constructor call as
    it is no longer supported
  • Add newline character at end of file for proper file formatting
+2/-2     

Description field no longer supported, causing image to not build.

Commented it out to get script working
@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
General
Remove commented-out obsolete code

Remove the commented-out description parameter from the FastMCP constructor
call, as it is obsolete and clutters the code.

MCP_Server/server.py [189]

-# FIELD NO LONGER SUPPORTED description="Ableton Live integration through the Model Context Protocol",
 
+
  • Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4

__

Why: The suggestion correctly advises removing commented-out code, which is a good practice for code cleanliness and maintainability, relying on version control for history.

Low
  • More

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant