Skip to content

Conversation

@DKos95
Copy link
Contributor

@DKos95 DKos95 commented Dec 11, 2025

@DKos95 DKos95 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 11, 2025 12:39
@aem-code-sync
Copy link
Contributor

aem-code-sync bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Hello, I'm the AEM Code Sync Bot and I will run some actions to deploy your branch.
In case there are problems, just click the checkbox below to rerun the respective action.

  • Re-sync branch
Commits

Copy link
Contributor

@mokimo mokimo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm usually not a big fan of language specific customizations, because that sounds like a rabbithole that can never be satisfied, but we also don't have any good strategy for it either.

@DKos95 DKos95 requested a review from a team December 12, 2025 12:07
@NadiiaSokolova NadiiaSokolova self-assigned this Dec 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@overmyheadandbody overmyheadandbody left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This essentially reverts #4714 that was handling two issues on Firefox. What changed in the meantime, making those fixes redundant? I suggest you have a look through the original stories, MWPW-177979 & MWPW-177321 to ensure the functionality on Firefox is still intact. It would also be advisable to reach out to the initial committer to see if they have additional insights.

@DKos95
Copy link
Contributor Author

DKos95 commented Dec 15, 2025

This essentially reverts #4714 that was handling two issues on Firefox. What changed in the meantime, making those fixes redundant? I suggest you have a look through the original stories, MWPW-177979 & MWPW-177321 to ensure the functionality on Firefox is still intact. It would also be advisable to reach out to the initial committer to see if they have additional insights.

It reverts part of that PR , the one of which had to do with the buttons in general MWPW-177979(no mention of FF in the ticket) and the other it doesn't touch regarding FF MWPW-177321. After making these changes I see nothing wrong on Chrome or FF for buttons regarding spacing. I don't know what the origin of the original problem was, maybe it was also bad authoring that was tried to be fixed with code but spacing looks good on those browsers using just the gap for spacing rather then specific top/left margin calculations which were probably also wrong because they result in spacing of 19px which seems very odd, it could be also that some other PR after this fixed the original problem better than this PR and that now the issue is not visible when removing this part of the code, also looking at the screenshots of the original problem we can see that the space between the buttons was very big and the current solution is no where near that and has 24px which is the gap initially applied and seems very appropriate, more than these calculations. Regarding reaching out to the original committer that would prove impossible since he is no longer active in Adobe from what I can see.

Copy link
Contributor

@overmyheadandbody overmyheadandbody left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I restored the page from Aug 6th, the last version before the bug was opened on Aug 11th and I can't reproduce the original bug either. You can find that here. I agree the original solution was less than ideal, but I'm also reluctant to remove it without some additional checks. I'll reach out with some additional steps to ensure we're not causing regressions. Approving for now so testing can start.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Reminder to set the Ready for Stage label - to queue this to get merged to stage & production.

Copy link
Contributor

@NadiiaSokolova NadiiaSokolova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Verified. Ready for Stage.
Testing details: MWPW-182533, MWPW-183428

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants