Skip to content

Conversation

@sigadamvenkata
Copy link
Collaborator

CC regression cases part 2
@aem-code-sync
Copy link

aem-code-sync bot commented Nov 30, 2025

Hello, I'm the AEM Code Sync Bot and I will run some actions to deploy your branch and validate page speed.
In case there are problems, just click a checkbox below to rerun the respective action.

  • Re-run PSI checks
  • Re-sync branch
Commits

@aem-code-sync
Copy link

aem-code-sync bot commented Nov 30, 2025

Page Scores Audits Google
📱 /creativecloud/?martech=off PERFORMANCE A11Y SEO BEST PRACTICES SI FCP LCP TBT CLS PSI
🖥️ /creativecloud/?martech=off PERFORMANCE A11Y SEO BEST PRACTICES SI FCP LCP TBT CLS PSI

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

Removed URL expectation from promo bar CTA test.
// Test promo bar CTAs navigates valid urls
test(`${features[2].name},${features[2].tags}`, async ({ page, baseURL }) => {
console.info(`[Test Page]: ${baseURL}${features[2].path}`);
const expectedUrl = features[2].url;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚫 [eslint] <no-unused-vars> reported by reviewdog 🐶
'expectedUrl' is assigned a value but never used.

@nkthakur48
Copy link
Collaborator

@sigadamvenkata Could you please check the linter issues?

Remove unused variable 'expectedUrl' in promo bar tests.
@sigadamvenkata
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@nishantka, linting issue is fixed. please have a look. thx

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

7 similar comments
@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

10 similar comments
@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

@milo-pr-merge-cc
Copy link

Skipped merging 836: CC regression test cases 2 due to failing checks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants