Skip to content

Conversation

@BotrosHanna-INL
Copy link
Collaborator

@BotrosHanna-INL BotrosHanna-INL commented Oct 3, 2024


Merge Request Description

The notebook results were not similar to the results using the cost reduction excel sheet tool which is published at:
https://inl.gov/content/uploads/2023/11/Nuclear-Reactor-Cost-Reduction-Pathway-Spreadsheet-Tool.xlsx**

Comparing the FOMs (OCC, TCI, construction duration) between the notebook and the excel sheet, the discrepancy is less than 0.1%. The screenshot (below) shows the FOAK, 2nd of a kind, 3rd of a kind, 10th of a kind estimates costs as estimated by the excel tool and Python. The difference between the results is negligible.

image

@JiaZhou-PU
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @BotrosHanna-INL I think I also need the input.xlsx in the same folder so in the cell 2 of CostReduction_exploration_mode.ipynb the function require an original inputs.

def reactor_data_read(reactor_type):
    
    if reactor_type == "Concept A":
        # Reading excel or csv files
        Reactor_data_0 = pd.read_excel('inputs.xlsx', sheet_name = "Concept_A", nrows= 69)
        reactor_power = 1056 * 1000 # kw
        
        
    elif reactor_type == "Concept B":
        # Reading excel or csv files
        Reactor_data_0 = pd.read_excel('inputs.xlsx', sheet_name = "Concept_B", nrows= 69)
        reactor_power = 310.8 * 1000 # kw    
        
    db = pd.DataFrame()
    db = Reactor_data_0[['Account', 'Title', 'Total Cost (USD)', 'Factory Equipment Cost', 'Site Labor Hours', 'Site Labor Cost',\
                    'Site Material Cost']].copy()
    Reactor_data = db
    return Reactor_data, reactor_power

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants