Benchmarking the Jupyter notebook against the spreadsheet. #41
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Merge Request Description
The notebook results were not similar to the results using the cost reduction excel sheet tool which is published at:
https://inl.gov/content/uploads/2023/11/Nuclear-Reactor-Cost-Reduction-Pathway-Spreadsheet-Tool.xlsx**
Comparing the FOMs (OCC, TCI, construction duration) between the notebook and the excel sheet, the discrepancy is less than 0.1%. The screenshot (below) shows the FOAK, 2nd of a kind, 3rd of a kind, 10th of a kind estimates costs as estimated by the excel tool and Python. The difference between the results is negligible.