Skip to content

Conversation

@scverse-bot
Copy link
Contributor

cookiecutter-scverse released v0.6.0.

Changes

CI updates

We now more consistently embrace hatch and uv in the template. CI now generates the job matrix from that hatch configuration. This means the pyproject.toml file is now the one single point of truth for both local and CI test jobs.

Documentation updates

We improved the "contributing guide" that is also synced into the repos using this template to recommend hatch
as the default project manager.

Chore

Full Changelog: scverse/cookiecutter-scverse@v0.5.0...v0.6.0

Additional remarks

  • unsubscribe: If you don’t want to receive these PRs in the future,
    add skip: true to template-repos.yml using a PR or,
    if you never want to sync from the template again, delete the .cruft.json file in the root of your repository.
  • If there are merge conflicts, you need to resolve them manually.
  • The scverse template works best when the pre-commit.ci, readthedocs and codecov services are enabled.
    Make sure to activate those apps if you haven't already.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 6, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.97%. Comparing base (bbce227) to head (b5fdb7b).
⚠️ Report is 101 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #37      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.86%   91.97%   -3.90%     
==========================================
  Files          19       31      +12     
  Lines        1378     2255     +877     
==========================================
+ Hits         1321     2074     +753     
- Misses         57      181     +124     

see 6 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@colganwi colganwi merged commit 589ecf6 into YosefLab:main Oct 6, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants