Skip to content

XPTOOLS/clawcode

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

9 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Rewriting Project Claw Code [CLONED]

Claw

Better Harness Tools, not merely storing the archive of leaked Claw Code

Sponsor on GitHub

Important

Rust port is now in progress on the dev/rust branch and is expected to be merged into main today. The Rust implementation aims to deliver a faster, memory-safe harness runtime. Stay tuned — this will be the definitive version of the project.

If you find this work useful, consider sponsoring @XPTOOLSTEAM on GitHub to support continued open-source harness engineering research.


Rust Port

The Rust workspace under rust/ is the current systems-language port of the project.

It currently includes:

  • crates/api-client — API client with provider abstraction, OAuth, and streaming support
  • crates/runtime — session state, compaction, MCP orchestration, prompt construction
  • crates/tools — tool manifest definitions and execution framework
  • crates/commands — slash commands, skills discovery, and config inspection
  • crates/plugins — plugin model, hook pipeline, and bundled plugins
  • crates/compat-harness — compatibility layer for upstream editor integration
  • crates/claw-cli — interactive REPL, markdown rendering, and project bootstrap/init flows

Run the Rust build:

cd rust
cargo build --release

The Creators Featured in Wall Street Journal For Avid Claw Code Fans

I've been deeply interested in harness engineering — studying how agent systems wire tools, orchestrate tasks, and manage runtime context. This isn't a sudden thing. The Wall Street Journal featured my work earlier this month, documenting how I've been one of the most active power users exploring these systems:

AI startup worker Sigrid Jin, who attended the Seoul dinner, single-handedly used 25 billion of Claw Code tokens last year. At the time, usage limits were looser, allowing early enthusiasts to reach tens of billions of tokens at a very low cost.

Despite his countless hours with Claw Code, Jin isn't faithful to any one AI lab. The tools available have different strengths and weaknesses, he said. Codex is better at reasoning, while Claw Code generates cleaner, more shareable code.

Jin flew to San Francisco in February for Claw Code's first birthday party, where attendees waited in line to compare notes with Cherny. The crowd included a practicing cardiologist from Belgium who had built an app to help patients navigate care, and a California lawyer who made a tool for automating building permit approvals using Claw Code.

"It was basically like a sharing party," Jin said. "There were lawyers, there were doctors, there were dentists. They did not have software engineering backgrounds."

The Wall Street Journal, March 21, 2026, "The Trillion Dollar Race to Automate Our Entire Lives"

WSJ Feature


Porting Status

The main source tree is now Python-first.

  • src/ contains the active Python porting workspace
  • tests/ verifies the current Python workspace
  • the exposed snapshot is no longer part of the tracked repository state

The current Python workspace is not yet a complete one-to-one replacement for the original system, but the primary implementation surface is now Python.

Repository Layout

.
├── src/                                # Python porting workspace
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── commands.py
│   ├── main.py
│   ├── models.py
│   ├── port_manifest.py
│   ├── query_engine.py
│   ├── task.py
│   └── tools.py
├── rust/                               # Rust port (claw CLI)
│   ├── crates/api/                     # API client + streaming
│   ├── crates/runtime/                 # Session, tools, MCP, config
│   ├── crates/claw-cli/               # Interactive CLI binary
│   ├── crates/plugins/                 # Plugin system
│   ├── crates/commands/                # Slash commands
│   ├── crates/server/                  # HTTP/SSE server (axum)
│   ├── crates/lsp/                    # LSP client integration
│   └── crates/tools/                   # Tool specs
├── tests/                              # Python verification
├── assets/omx/                         # OmX workflow screenshots
├── 2026-03-09-is-legal-the-same-as-legitimate-ai-reimplementation-and-the-erosion-of-copyleft.md
└── README.md

Python Workspace Overview

The new Python src/ tree currently provides:

  • port_manifest.py — summarizes the current Python workspace structure
  • models.py — dataclasses for subsystems, modules, and backlog state
  • commands.py — Python-side command port metadata
  • tools.py — Python-side tool port metadata
  • query_engine.py — renders a Python porting summary from the active workspace
  • main.py — a CLI entrypoint for manifest and summary output

Quickstart

Render the Python porting summary:

python3 -m src.main summary

Print the current Python workspace manifest:

python3 -m src.main manifest

List the current Python modules:

python3 -m src.main subsystems --limit 16

Run verification:

python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -v

Run the parity audit against the local ignored archive (when present):

python3 -m src.main parity-audit

Inspect mirrored command/tool inventories:

python3 -m src.main commands --limit 10
python3 -m src.main tools --limit 10

Current Parity Checkpoint

The port now mirrors the archived root-entry file surface, top-level subsystem names, and command/tool inventories much more closely than before. However, it is not yet a full runtime-equivalent replacement for the original TypeScript system; the Python tree still contains fewer executable runtime slices than the archived source.

Built with oh-my-codex and oh-my-opencode

This repository's porting, cleanroom hardening, and verification workflow was AI-assisted with Yeachan Heo's tooling stack, with oh-my-codex (OmX) as the primary scaffolding and orchestration layer.

  • oh-my-codex (OmX) — scaffolding, orchestration, architecture direction, and core porting workflow
  • oh-my-opencode (OmO) — implementation acceleration, cleanup, and verification support

Key workflow patterns used during the port:

  • $team mode: coordinated parallel review and architectural feedback
  • $ralph mode: persistent execution, verification, and completion discipline
  • Cleanroom passes: naming/branding cleanup, QA, and release validation across the Rust workspace
  • Manual and live validation: build, test, manual QA, and real API-path verification before publish

OmX workflow screenshots

OmX workflow screenshot 1

Ralph/team orchestration view while the README and essay context were being reviewed in terminal panes.

OmX workflow screenshot 2

Split-pane review and verification flow during the final README wording pass.

Ownership / Affiliation Disclaimer

  • This repository does not claim ownership of the original Claw Code source material.
  • This repository is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or maintained by the original authors.

About

This is a clean-room rewrite of the leaked "Claw Code" for studying "harness engineering" — how AI coding assistants structure commands, tools, session management, and MCP (Model Context Protocol) orchestration.

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors