-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
show also glider sectors on map #773
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
KaiWissel
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
show-glider-sector-on-map
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aber dann sehen wir doch den W Luftraum wenn man da drauf flicht und nicht den eigentlichen. Das hatte ja irgendwie schon nen Sinn, das wir das so gemacht haben damals. Der W liegt ja immer komplett innerhalb eines anderen LR
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wie in folgendem Screenshot, sieht man anhand der "dunkleren" Überlagerung das da eigentlich noch mehr ist.
Aber ich kann das Pop-Up noch etwas tunen, so dass beide Airspaces erwähnt werden.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JEK58
So besser?

Wäre es nur umständlich möglich die Daten des darunter liegenden Luftraums im selben Pop-Up anzuzeigen.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ne eigentlich nicht, man sieht ja den eigentlichen Airspace nicht und die meisten Leute raffen das mit den Segelflugsektoren ja offensichtlich eh nicht.
Ich würde die einfach garnicht anzeigen und ignorieren. Die liegen eh immer innerhalb eines LR auf den wir prüfen. Für den seltenen Fall, dass jemand einen Segelflugsektor nutzt wird er das plausibel erklären können. Alles andere verwirrt glaube ich nur oder verleitet zu dummen Aktionen wegen Halbwissen.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Und das ganze farblich anders darzustellen?
flyxc.app macht das z.B. so:

There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ja könnte man machen, aber mit gelb signalisiert man irgendwie auch, dass es nicht so schlimm wäre da einzufliegen. Ich würde es tatsächlich lassen wie es ist. 99% der Piloten sollten und dürfen da eh nicht rein;)