This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 19, 2025. It is now read-only.
Renamed DWProx Documentation to Whitehill Documentation#46
Closed
raadtotheraad wants to merge 1 commit intoWhitehillGroup:mainfrom
Closed
Renamed DWProx Documentation to Whitehill Documentation#46raadtotheraad wants to merge 1 commit intoWhitehillGroup:mainfrom
raadtotheraad wants to merge 1 commit intoWhitehillGroup:mainfrom
Conversation
Did the stuff responsible for it
Contributor
|
Autopro is basically DWProx. Even though it's just called "Autopro" |
Contributor
|
AutoPro is under the DWProx family of products, as such this change will not be implemented at this exact moment in time. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I had the idea to rename it because there is also AutoPro which is by Whitehill and isn't specific to DWProx.
Thats all, its just an idea and really doesn't need to be implemented, but I won't mind if this gets merged.