Security and code quality review: Analysis of 9 identified issues #3
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Comprehensive security and maintainability review of recent Toon format implementation, covering configuration validation, error handling, XSS concerns, and code maintainability across 9 identified areas.
Analysis Summary
Generated detailed Chinese analysis report (
/tmp/code-review-analysis.md) examining:Key Findings
🔴 Critical: Silent Template Loading Failures
Lines 30-32, 41-43 in
default-chat.ts:Impact: Toon format silently degrades to default when templates missing. Zero visibility for debugging.
🟡 Configuration Validation Gaps
maxRenderDepth: Has.min(1)but no.max()- allows DoS via excessive depth// TODO: 从配置读取Schema.intersect: No tests validating field name conflicts across config modules🟡 Template-Parser Mismatch
output.toon.mustachestates params "应该包含inner_thoughts" butToonParserdoesn't validate it. Template guidance vs enforcement inconsistent.🟢 False Positives
escape: (text) => textis correct - outputs to LLM API not browsergetRequiredVariablesalready handles cycles withvisitedPartialsSetRecommendations by Priority
Immediate (1h):
.max(10)tomaxRenderDepthschemaShort-term (4h):
PromptServiceConfigOptional (3h):
Total estimated effort: ~8.5 hours across priorities
No Code Changes
Per problem statement ("核查...但是不要修改"), this PR contains analysis only. Implementation of fixes requires separate approval.
Original prompt
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.