Skip to content

Conversation

@davidwalter2
Copy link
Collaborator

@davidwalter2 davidwalter2 commented Dec 17, 2025

  • Add a reco bin edge at ptll 1.5GeV and two split the gen bin ptZ [0,2]GeV into two: [0,1] and [1,2] to have 1 GeV bins from 0 to 12 GeV.
  • Add option in mw histmaker to include the mt cut also at gen events for unfolding
  • Fix previously only partially fixed mistake (52b6ddb)
  • Add support for WtoNMu mN=30GeV sample; change functionality to select a specific BSM model instead of excluding them
  • Add support to include SM Wmunu sample copy as additional WtoNMu mN=0GeV proxy

"ptll": r"$\mathrm{Reco}\ p_\mathrm{T}^{\ell\ell}\ [\mathrm{GeV}]$",
"ptW": r"$\mathrm{Reco}\ p_\mathrm{T}^{\ell\nu}\ [\mathrm{GeV}]$",
"ptVGen": r"$\mathrm{Gen}\ p_\mathrm{T}^Z\ [\mathrm{GeV}]$",
"yll": r"$\mathrm{Reco}\ Y^{\ell\ell}$",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we use lower y for rapidity? For consistency with what we did so far and in the published analysis

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

"QCDscaleZPtChargeHelicityMiNNLO": "<i>μ</i><sub>R </sub> <i>μ</i><sub>F </sub> scale (Z)",
"QCDscaleWPtChargeHelicityMiNNLO": "<i>μ</i><sub>R </sub> <i>μ</i><sub>F </sub> scale (W)",
"binByBinStat": "Bin-by-bin stat.",
"binByBinStat": "Simulation stat.",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about the shorter "MC stat." ? It depends on where it appears, otherwise "Simulation stat." is fine.
I assume we no longer have cases where this group might include data-driven background statistical uncertainties, otherwise "Prediction stat." might be another alternative

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think "MC" is more slang and since the data driven part is not included at the moment I think "Simulation stat." is fine".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants