feat: change the license to MIT #1
Open
+37
−732
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
@toxic-johann It looks weird to me that you haven't applied any changes on dependencies but the yarn.lock file has many deleted items, I'm not sure whether it's expected. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The license for the devtools-backend is Apache-2.0
The license for the devttols-frontend is BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
According to the Wiki, we can relicense it.
Below is the license report of our dependencies. There is no limitation for us to change the repo to MIT license.
Let's change the license to MIT. I use this tool to change.