Skip to content

Conversation

@jarofgreen
Copy link
Contributor

The latest version of the library was already included in requirements

#140

@jarofgreen jarofgreen self-assigned this Mar 25, 2025
@jarofgreen jarofgreen requested a review from michaelwood March 25, 2025 16:16
Copy link
Member

@michaelwood michaelwood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks - happy for the matrix strategy to be removed too as we're not planning on support for any other versions of python than our live version.

@jarofgreen
Copy link
Contributor Author

You'll probably need to tweak you GitHub protected branch settings then but sure.

jarofgreen added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2025
The latest version of the library was already included in requirements

Remove python matrix; it causes problems with parellel builds
https://docs.coveralls.io/parallel-builds#whats-a-parallel-build
And after chatting to MW there will only be one verson anyway

#143

#140
jarofgreen added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2025
The latest version of the library was already included in requirements

Remove python matrix; it causes problems with parellel builds
https://docs.coveralls.io/parallel-builds#whats-a-parallel-build
And after chatting to MW there will only be one verson anyway

#143

#140
jarofgreen added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2025
The latest version of the library was already included in requirements

Remove python matrix; it causes problems with parellel builds
https://docs.coveralls.io/parallel-builds#whats-a-parallel-build
And after chatting to MW there will only be one verson anyway

#143

#140
@jarofgreen jarofgreen requested a review from michaelwood March 26, 2025 08:50
The latest version of the library was already included in requirements

Remove python matrix; it causes problems with parellel builds
https://docs.coveralls.io/parallel-builds#whats-a-parallel-build
And after chatting to MW there will only be one verson anyway

#143

#140
@michaelwood michaelwood merged commit 9756b1d into main Mar 27, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
@michaelwood michaelwood deleted the issue-140 branch March 27, 2025 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants