Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions docs/issue-45.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
# Issue 45

Work in progress by Emulated Coder.

Ref: #45
Comment on lines +1 to +5
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR claims to "Implement Real Groth16 State Circuit Constraints" but only adds a placeholder documentation file with no actual implementation code. The repository already has comprehensive Groth16 state circuit constraints implemented in crates/bitcell-zkp/src/state_constraints.rs (lines 1-300+) with proper R1CS constraints for Merkle tree verification, nullifier derivation, and commitment verification using arkworks. This placeholder file should be removed, and if issue #45 genuinely requires new circuit constraint implementations, the actual code changes should be included in the PR.

Suggested change
# Issue 45
Work in progress by Emulated Coder.
Ref: #45

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +1 to +5
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This documentation file provides no useful information or implementation details. It simply states "Work in progress" without explaining what the issue is about, what needs to be implemented, or how it relates to Groth16 state circuit constraints. Either this file should be removed entirely, or it should contain meaningful documentation about the issue, the proposed solution, implementation plan, or technical specifications for the circuit constraints that need to be added.

Suggested change
# Issue 45
Work in progress by Emulated Coder.
Ref: #45
# Issue 45: Add Groth16 State Circuit Constraints
## Background
Groth16 is a widely used zk-SNARK proving system that requires careful circuit design to ensure correctness, security, and efficiency. In our project, the state circuit is responsible for enforcing the validity of state transitions within the zero-knowledge proof. Proper constraints must be implemented to guarantee that only valid transitions are provable.
## Problem Statement
Currently, the state circuit lacks several necessary constraints to fully support Groth16 proofs. This may allow invalid state transitions to be accepted, undermining the security guarantees of the system. The missing constraints need to be identified, specified, and implemented.
## Proposed Solution
1. **Review the current state circuit implementation** to identify missing or incomplete constraints.
2. **Specify the required constraints** for Groth16 compatibility, including:
- State transition validity (e.g., correct application of operations)
- Range checks and field validity
- Consistency with public inputs and outputs
3. **Implement the constraints** in the circuit codebase.
4. **Write comprehensive tests** to ensure the constraints are enforced and the circuit behaves as expected.
## Implementation Plan
- [ ] Audit the current state circuit for missing constraints.
- [ ] Document each required constraint and its purpose.
- [ ] Update the circuit code to add the new constraints.
- [ ] Add or update test cases to cover all constraint scenarios.
- [ ] Review and optimize for performance and proof size.
## Technical Specifications
- The constraints should be compatible with the Groth16 proving system.
- All state transitions must be strictly validated.
- The implementation should follow best practices for zero-knowledge circuit design.
## References
- [Groth16 paper](https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/260.pdf)
- [Project Issue #45](https://github.com/your-repo/issues/45)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.