Skip to content

feat: Add TierID to SearchTierNodesCtx: BED-7415#2423

Open
brandonshearin wants to merge 9 commits intomainfrom
BED-7415
Open

feat: Add TierID to SearchTierNodesCtx: BED-7415#2423
brandonshearin wants to merge 9 commits intomainfrom
BED-7415

Conversation

@brandonshearin
Copy link
Contributor

@brandonshearin brandonshearin commented Feb 25, 2026

Description

Describe your changes in detail

Motivation and Context

Resolves <TICKET_OR_ISSUE_NUMBER>

Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.
Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to
see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc.

Screenshots (optional):

Types of changes

  • Chore (a change that does not modify the application functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Database Migrations

Checklist:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal data structure handling to improve context management.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 25, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a13c695 and 1078a19.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/go/analysis/tiering/helpers.go

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new TierID field was added to the SearchTierNodesCtx struct in the helpers module. The constructor was expanded to accept and initialize this field, with corresponding updates to all call sites to pass the tier ID value.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Struct Enhancement
packages/go/analysis/tiering/helpers.go
Added TierID int field to SearchTierNodesCtx struct; updated NewSearchTierNodesCtx constructor to accept tierID parameter and initialize the new field; propagated changes to constructor call sites.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The pull request description is incomplete, containing only the template with unfilled placeholder sections and unchecked checklist items, lacking actual details about changes, motivation, testing, and type classification. Fill in all required sections: provide a detailed description of changes, explain motivation and problem being solved, describe testing approach and environment, select applicable change type(s), and verify/check the contributing prerequisites and documentation checklist items.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: adding TierID to SearchTierNodesCtx, and includes the associated ticket reference (BED-7415).

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
  • 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch BED-7415

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@brandonshearin brandonshearin changed the title Add TierID to SearchTierNodesCtx: BED-7415 feat: Add TierID to SearchTierNodesCtx: BED-7415 Feb 25, 2026
@brandonshearin brandonshearin self-assigned this Feb 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant