Skip to content

feat: build multi-arch#47

Merged
ngovinh2k2 merged 1 commit intodevfrom
feat/build-multi-arch
Jan 28, 2026
Merged

feat: build multi-arch#47
ngovinh2k2 merged 1 commit intodevfrom
feat/build-multi-arch

Conversation

@ngovinh2k2
Copy link
Contributor

What?

Build multi-arch for image

Why?

From the request

How?

Testing?

  • Functional Testing
  • Security
  • Performance
  • Error Handling
  • Code Quality
  • Documentation
  • Database
  • Deployment
  • Final Review

Anything Else?

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 23, 2026

Claude finished @ngovinh2k2's task —— View job


Pull Request Review ✅

I've completed my review of this multi-architecture build implementation. Here's my analysis:

Tasks

  • Read and analyze the workflow file changes
  • Review multi-arch implementation for best practices
  • Check for security concerns
  • Assess performance considerations
  • Evaluate test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

Excellent implementation! The multi-arch setup follows GitHub Actions best practices:

  • Proper QEMU setup: Using docker/setup-qemu-action@v3 for cross-platform emulation
  • Docker Buildx: Correctly configured with docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
  • Modern action versions: All actions use recent stable versions (v3-v5)
  • Clean platform specification: linux/amd64,linux/arm64 covers the most common architectures
  • Appropriate trigger: Only runs on published releases from main branch

Security Analysis ✅

No security concerns identified:

  • ✅ Uses official Docker actions from trusted publishers
  • ✅ Proper GHCR authentication with scoped GITHUB_TOKEN
  • ✅ Minimal permissions: contents: read, packages: write
  • ✅ Dockerfile follows security best practices (non-root user, minimal base image)
  • ✅ No secrets exposure in the workflow

Performance Considerations ✅

Good performance characteristics:

  • Build time impact: Multi-arch builds will take ~2x longer due to ARM64 emulation, but this is expected and acceptable for release builds
  • Parallel building: Docker Buildx handles parallel builds efficiently
  • Image size: Go binary with CGO_ENABLED=0 works well across architectures
  • Caching: Buildx supports cross-platform layer caching

Recommendation: Consider adding build caching to speed up subsequent builds:

- name: Build & Push Docker image
  uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
  with:
    context: .
    file: ./Dockerfile
    push: true
    platforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64
    tags: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }}
    labels: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.labels }}
    cache-from: type=gha
    cache-to: type=gha,mode=max
    secrets: |
      GITHUB_TOKEN=${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

Potential Issues ❌

No bugs or critical issues found. The implementation is solid.

Test Coverage Considerations 📋

The current testing checklist in the PR description should cover:

  • Functional Testing: Verify images work on both AMD64 and ARM64 platforms
  • Performance: Test startup time and runtime performance on both architectures
  • Deployment: Ensure the multi-arch images deploy correctly to target environments

Suggestion: Add a simple workflow test to verify the Docker build process works in CI without publishing.

Summary

This is a well-implemented multi-architecture build setup that follows industry best practices. The changes are minimal, focused, and secure. The only enhancement I'd suggest is adding build caching for performance optimization.

Approval recommended


Comment on lines +23 to +28
# Enable multi-arch
- name: Set up QEMU
uses: docker/setup-qemu-action@v3

# Enable buildx
- name: Set up Docker Buildx
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need these configure @ngovinh2k2

@ngovinh2k2 ngovinh2k2 merged commit 7fe683e into dev Jan 28, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants