Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Jan 14, 2026

Thanks for asking me to work on this. I will get started on it and keep this PR's description up to date as I form a plan and make progress.

Original prompt

Description
The backend-fw repository requires a comprehensive review to ensure technical debt is identified and architectural standards are maintained. This task serves as a quality gate to ensure the framework remains scalable and performant before further feature development. This review is critical to mitigate long-term maintenance risks and ensure the codebase follows established best practices.

Ownership, Deadline & Effort
Team Owner: Backend

Individual Owner: @99802205450481

Deadline: 2026-01-15 24:00 (end of day)

Estimated Effort: 3 hours

Deliverables
Review Summary Report: A document or GitHub comment summarizing findings and architectural health.

Issue Backlog: A set of linked GitHub issues for any identified bugs, technical debt, or refactoring needs.

Approval/Request for Changes: Formal review status on the repository’s current state or relevant open PRs.

Scope
In Scope:

Assessment of code structure and modularity.

Identification of outdated dependencies or security vulnerabilities.

Review of API consistency and documentation completeness.

Evaluation of test coverage and error handling patterns.

Out of Scope:

Active refactoring or code fixes (these should be logged as separate issues).

Front-end integration testing.

Performance benchmarking/load testing.

Acceptance Criteria
[ ] Repository structure adheres to the organization’s standard backend architecture.

[ ] All critical security vulnerabilities identified during the review are documented.

[ ] At least one comprehensive review summary is provided, covering strengths and weaknesses.

[ ] Any necessary follow-up tasks are created as actionable GitHub issues with appropriate labels.

[ ] The review is completed within the allocated 3-hour window.

Domain-Specific Notes: Engineering
Dependencies: Check for deprecated libraries in package.json or equivalent dependency manifests.

APIs: Ensure REST/GraphQL endpoints follow naming conventions and return appropriate status codes.

Assumption: The reviewer has administrative or read-access to the backend-fw repository and its internal documentation.

Validation / Review Requirements
Definition of Done: The review summary is published, follow-up issues are created, and the lead architect has been notified of the findings.

Required Reviewers: Engineering Lead or Senior Backend Architect.

Additional Context
Related Repository: backend-fw


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copilot AI requested a review from MehmetBegun January 14, 2026 14:10
Copilot stopped work on behalf of MehmetBegun due to an error January 14, 2026 14:10
@MehmetBegun MehmetBegun deleted the copilot/review-architectural-standards branch January 15, 2026 13:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants