-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
Fix test runner and output #850
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,9 +1,16 @@ | ||
| #!/usr/bin/env bash | ||
|
|
||
| if [[ 2 -eq $# ]]; then | ||
| bundle exec rake TEST="$1" TESTOPTS="-n='/$2/'" | ||
| elif [[ 1 -eq $# ]]; then | ||
| bundle exec rake TEST="$1" | ||
| else | ||
| bundle exec rake "$@" | ||
| fi | ||
| #!/usr/bin/env ruby | ||
| # frozen_string_literal: true | ||
|
|
||
| # | ||
| # This file was generated by Bundler. | ||
| # | ||
| # The application 'minitest' is installed as part of a gem, and | ||
| # this file is here to facilitate running it. | ||
| # | ||
|
|
||
| ENV["BUNDLE_GEMFILE"] ||= File.expand_path("../Gemfile", __dir__) | ||
|
|
||
| require "rubygems" | ||
| require "bundler/setup" | ||
|
|
||
| load Gem.bin_path("minitest", "minitest") |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we still need the reporter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes! This is for registering Minitest Reporters' plugin to Minitest (which used to be automatic previously), but we still need to set the reporter, etc after that.
In the next release of
minitest-reportersthis should be done automatically inside the library. For now, we need to do it explicitly.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean, do we still need the reporter itself?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, maybe not. Without the reporter, all you get is the dots for each test. I thought you wanted to keep the spec style reporting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No it's me being confused, since I saw just dots in the output before this PR, but indeed the output is much better with the reporter enabled 👍
Though, iirc it's a bit buggy with parallelism like in Tapioca?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't seen this one be that buggy, tbh, we can always change it if it is.