Skip to content

Use Concurrent::Set instead of Set#354

Merged
ChrisBr merged 1 commit intomainfrom
sto/concurrent-set
Aug 19, 2025
Merged

Use Concurrent::Set instead of Set#354
ChrisBr merged 1 commit intomainfrom
sto/concurrent-set

Conversation

@davidstosik
Copy link
Contributor

ci-queue depends on ActiveSupport, which depends on concurrent-ruby, so
we do have access to Concurrent::Set.

ci-queue depends on ActiveSupport, which depends on concurrent-ruby, so
we do have access to `Concurrent::Set`.
@ChrisBr ChrisBr merged commit 4777fbc into main Aug 19, 2025
13 of 23 checks passed
@davidstosik davidstosik deleted the sto/concurrent-set branch August 20, 2025 06:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants