-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
Fix race in requeue #349
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fix race in requeue #349
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we're doing
hdelhere, thetransaction.hdel(key('error-reports'), id)becomes redundant.But also since they were in a transaction, I don't see what this changes.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is requeue which is not in a transaction. It's called from the queue.
BuildStatusRecorderwill callrecord_successwhich will remove the error reportThis opens a window for a race because as soon as it's requeued a new worker can run it and report a new error report which could be deleted again by the worker which did the requeue.
It's also not redundant because we now call
record_requeue(instead ofrecord_success) which will only report the status. We still need to do the delete inrecord_successwhich is in a transaction withacknowledgealready.ci-queue/ruby/lib/minitest/queue.rb
Lines 189 to 191 in d154d85
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In
record_successit very much seem redundant:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we call
requeuewe don't callrecord_successanymore butrecord_requeuewhich is only setting the stats.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Before we were calling
record_successon requeues and wereAs we now delete the error report from inside the
requeuelua script I've created a dedicated method.The alternative would be to alter
record_successto something like thisBut it's difficult because the return values would be incorrect in that case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well.
error_reports_deleted_countis now already always0because it's deleted insideacknowledge.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not
acknowledge- we delete it inrequeue. I think you might be mixing upacknowledgeandrequeuescripts?We don't call
acknowledgeon a requeue, we only callrequeue. Hence, we either doacknowledgeandhdelthe error-reportsrequeue(and don't callhdelin that case because it's insiderequeuealready)Right, but the assignments would be messed up, no?
Anyway,
error_reports_deleted_countandrequeued_countare really only relevant on success to identify a flaky test. It doesn't matter on arequeue.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah indeed...