default claude and prettier repo level config

[kernelsam]

Issue number: senzing-garage/template-python#340 senzing-factory/build-resources#245

---

Resolves senzing-garage/template-python#340
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#245

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Based on my analysis of the pull request diff, here is my code review:

Code Review Results

✅ Code Quality

• ✅ Code follows style guide: The changes consist primarily of configuration files (JSON, Markdown). The formatting is clean and follows standard conventions.

• ✅ No commented-out code: No commented-out code present in the diff.

• ✅ Meaningful names: Variable names in .claude/settings.local.json:2 (includeCoAuthoredBy) are clear and descriptive.

• ✅ DRY principle followed: No code duplication present. The changes are configuration-based.

• ✅ Defects identified: No bugs, logic errors, race conditions, or security vulnerabilities detected. The changes are low-risk configuration updates.

• ✅ Project memory configuration: No .claude/CLAUDE.md file exists in the repository. The new .claude/settings.local.json file appropriately contains local-specific settings (the includeCoAuthoredBy flag is developer-specific).

⚠️ Testing

• N/A Unit tests: Not applicable - these are configuration files only.
• N/A Integration tests: Not applicable - no code changes requiring integration tests.
• N/A Edge cases: Not applicable - configuration files.
• N/A Test coverage: Not applicable - no executable code.

❌ Documentation

• ❌ CHANGELOG.md not updated: The CHANGELOG.md file (last updated 2021-01-05) was not updated to reflect these changes. Configuration updates like adding Claude commands and cspell improvements should be documented.

  • File: CHANGELOG.md:1
  • Recommendation: Add an entry documenting the addition of .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md, .claude/settings.local.json, and cspell.json improvements.

• ✅ Markdown formatting:

  • .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:1-3: Properly formatted, follows CommonMark specification.
  • No extra whitespace issues detected.

• ✅ Inline comments: The cleaned-up cspell.json properly removed unnecessary comments, which is appropriate for JSON files.

✅ Security

• ✅ No hardcoded credentials: No credentials present.

• ✅ Input validation: Not applicable - configuration files only.

• ✅ Proper error handling: Not applicable - configuration files only.

• ✅ No sensitive data in logs: No logging code present.

• ✅ No license files: No .lic files or AQAAAD strings found in the changes. Note: The grep search found AQAAAD in untracked files (prompt-temp.md, prompt-header.md, build-resources/claude/pr-prompt.md), but these are NOT part of this PR diff.

📝 Additional Observations

Positive Changes:

1. .vscode/cspell.json:1-16: Good cleanup - removed unnecessary comments and properly formatted JSON. Added "esbenp" to the dictionary (likely for VS Code extension author).
2. .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:1-3: Good addition for standardizing code reviews across the organization.
3. .claude/settings.local.json:1-3: Appropriate local configuration for Claude.

Minor Issues:

1. .vscode/cspell.json:9: The word "esbenp" was added - ensure this is intentional. It appears to be related to a VS Code extension author name and may be legitimate.

Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor recommendation

The PR is well-structured with clean configuration changes. The only missing item is updating the CHANGELOG.md to document these improvements. This is a minor documentation issue and does not block approval.

Action Items:

1. Update CHANGELOG.md to document the configuration additions.

---

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards