default claude and prettier repo level config

[kernelsam]

Issue number: senzing-garage/template-python#340 senzing-factory/build-resources#245

---

Resolves senzing-garage/template-python#340
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#245

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Automated Code Review

Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide

The changes are minimal configuration files that follow appropriate JSON formatting standards. However, I cannot fully verify against the Senzing style guide without examining it first.

✅ No commented-out code

All comments removed from .vscode/cspell.json are standard descriptive comments, not commented-out code. The file is now cleaner.

✅ Meaningful variable names

Configuration keys are clear and self-explanatory:

• includeCoAuthoredBy in .claude/settings.local.json
• Standard cspell configuration keys in .vscode/cspell.json

✅ DRY principle followed

No code duplication present in these configuration files.

✅ Identify Defects

No bugs, logic errors, or security vulnerabilities detected. The changes are straightforward configuration updates:

• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3 - Simple command definition referencing external prompt
• .claude/settings.local.json:2 - Boolean configuration flag
• .vscode/cspell.json - Cleaned up formatting and added "esbenp" to dictionary

⚠️ Project memory configuration

.claude/settings.local.json is appropriately marked as *.local.json, suggesting it's for local development only. However, the file is being committed to the repository. If this should be environment-specific, consider adding it to .gitignore.

Testing

⚠️ Unit tests for new functions

N/A - These are configuration files without testable logic.

⚠️ Integration tests for new endpoints

N/A - No endpoints added.

⚠️ Edge cases covered

N/A - Configuration files.

⚠️ Test coverage > 80%

N/A - No code requiring test coverage.

Documentation

⚠️ Readme updated if needed

No README changes included. Consider documenting:

• The new /senzing-code-review command in project documentation
• The purpose of .claude/settings.local.json and when developers should modify it

✅ API docs updated

N/A - No API changes.

✅ Inline comments for complex logic

Appropriately removed redundant comments from .vscode/cspell.json. The configuration is self-explanatory.

❌ CHANGELOG.md updated

No CHANGELOG.md update detected. This should document:

• Addition of /senzing-code-review command for Claude
• New Claude local settings configuration
• Updated cspell dictionary (added "esbenp")

✅ Markdown files follow CommonMark

.claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:1-3 follows CommonMark specification correctly.

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials

No credentials present in the changes.

✅ Input validation implemented

N/A - Configuration files only.

✅ Proper error handling

N/A - No executable code.

✅ No sensitive data in logs

No logging code present.

✅ No license files

No .lic files or AQAAAD strings detected.

---

Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor recommendations

The PR adds useful development tooling (Claude code review command and configuration) with clean JSON formatting. All changes are low-risk configuration updates.

Required Actions:

• ❌ Update CHANGELOG.md to document these changes

Recommendations:

1. Consider documenting the new /senzing-code-review command usage in the README or developer documentation
2. Verify that .claude/settings.local.json should be committed - the *.local.* naming convention typically suggests it should be gitignored for local-only settings
3. The added dictionary word "esbenp" appears to be a VS Code extension publisher ID - confirm this is intentional

Files Changed:

• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md (new file)
• .claude/settings.local.json (new file)
• .vscode/cspell.json (formatting improvements, added word)

---

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards