default claude and prettier repo level config

[kernelsam]

Issue number: senzing-garage/template-python#340 senzing-factory/build-resources#245

---

Resolves senzing-garage/template-python#340
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#245

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Automated Code Review

Analysis of Pull Request Changes

This PR adds Claude Code configuration files and updates the cspell dictionary. Let me review against the checklist:

---

✅ Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide

• The changes are primarily configuration files (JSON and Markdown), which are formatted correctly
• JSON files use proper 2-space indentation
• Markdown file follows CommonMark specification

✅ No commented-out code

• All commented lines removed from .vscode/cspell.json:2-4 (the descriptive comments were removed, which improves cleanliness)

✅ Meaningful variable names

• Configuration keys are clear and descriptive (includeCoAuthoredBy, ignorePaths, etc.)

✅ DRY principle followed

• No code duplication present in these configuration files

✅ No defects identified

• Configuration files are syntactically valid
• No logic errors, security vulnerabilities, or edge cases applicable to these config files

⚠️ Project Memory Configuration Check

• No .claude/CLAUDE.md file exists in the repository to evaluate against
• The new .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md references an external resource which is appropriate

---

⚠️ Testing

N/A - Not applicable for configuration files

• These are configuration files only; no executable code to test

---

⚠️ Documentation

✅ Inline documentation appropriate

• Configuration files are self-documenting
• The senzing-code-review command has clear purpose

⚠️ CHANGELOG.md updated

• No CHANGELOG.md visible in repository to verify if update needed
• If one exists, it should be updated to reflect new Claude Code review command

✅ Markdown formatting

• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:1-3 follows CommonMark specification
• No extra whitespace issues detected

---

✅ Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials

• No credentials present in any files

✅ No sensitive data

• Configuration values are benign (includeCoAuthoredBy: false)

✅ No license files or AQAAAD strings

• No .lic files or suspicious license strings detected

✅ Proper configuration scope

• .claude/settings.local.json appropriately uses .local.json suffix, suggesting it's for local overrides (though the filename implies it should be gitignored)

---

⚠️ Issues & Recommendations

Minor Issues:

1. .claude/settings.local.json (file should be gitignored?)

   • The .local.json suffix typically indicates local-only configuration that shouldn't be committed
   • Consider if this should be .claude/settings.json instead, or add settings.local.json to .gitignore

2. Word list in .vscode/cspell.json:4-14

   • New word added: esbenp - This appears to be a VS Code extension author ID. Verify this is intentional for the project dictionary
   • Words are now alphabetically sorted, which is good for maintainability

---

Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor recommendations

The changes are clean, well-formatted, and introduce useful developer tooling. The only consideration is whether .claude/settings.local.json should be committed or gitignored based on your team's conventions for local vs. shared configuration.

Files Changed:

• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:1-3 - New command definition
• .claude/settings.local.json:1-3 - New Claude settings
• .vscode/cspell.json:1-17 - Cleaned up comments, sorted words, added "esbenp"

---

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards