Infer required BibTex entries from the library table instead of the sample table #174
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jfy133
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2025
Member
|
Ah @alexhbnr is there any docs that should be updated anywhere regarding it? |
Collaborator
Author
|
Good point @jfy133! I will update the documentation on this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should solve the issue #147.
Instead of using the list of samples as the input for the function that retrieves the DOI values, it uses the library table instead. In the example that @jfy133 posted in the issue #147, this version now drops Warinner2024 because their samples are only single-end sequenced but instead adds Klapper2023 as the study published additional paired-end sequencing data for samples from the study FellowsYates2021.