-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
X-ARAPUCA Offline Decoder Update: combination of the extended fragments #847
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
X-ARAPUCA Offline Decoder Update: combination of the extended fragments #847
Conversation
… extended fragments combination
|
Hi Alicia! Nice work! I took a look at the decode/combine waveform functions, and it looks to me like the only check of whether to combine two waveforms is a length check. We might want to additionally require that the timestamps of the extensions are compatible with the waveform that you're trying to combine it with... in all normal cases this should be true but it doesn't hurt to have an explicit check I think. |
|
@aliciavr Can you respond to this follow up q? Thanks! |
|
Working on that thank you! |
|
@aliciavr deadline for validation ii is in a few days, if you are interested in getting this in please wrap up work soon! |
… not fulfill the requirements
…ected jittering of the extended fragments.
…indexing. Improve jittering application.
|
Just finished implementing the new timing requirements for the combination of extended fragments! A different approach has been followed for the XAs case as discussed offline |
|
For record keeping purposes, more details in https://sbn-docdb.fnal.gov/cgi-bin/sso/ShowDocument?docid=44578 |
Description
Checklist
Reviewers,AssigneesDevelopementRelevant PR links (optional)
Does this PR require merging another PR in a different repository (such as sbnanobj/sbnobj etc.)?
Link(s) to docdb describing changes (optional)
Is there a docdb describing the issue this solves or the feature added? SBN-doc-44578.