feat: add lit protocol provider and capacity credits delegation #1475
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce new encryption formats and enhance the existing functionality of the Request Network SDK by integrating the Lit Protocol. Key modifications include the addition of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Warning Rate limit exceeded@rodrigopavezi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
requested review from
MantisClone,
aimensahnoun,
alexandre-abrioux and
sstefdev
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (30)
packages/multi-format/src/encryption/kms-format.ts (2)
5-7: Enhance class documentationThe current documentation is minimal. Consider adding:
- Purpose and use cases for KMS encryption
- How this integrates with Lit Protocol
- Examples of usage
- Any requirements or prerequisites
Example enhancement:
/** * Class to serialize and deserialize multi-format KMS encrypted data + * + * This class handles Key Management Service (KMS) encrypted data within the multi-format framework. + * It integrates with Lit Protocol for decentralized key management. + * + * @example + * const kmsFormat = new KMSMultiFormat(); + * // Example usage with encryption/decryption */
9-11: Consider adding input validationThe constructor accepts no parameters but uses specific encryption constants. Consider adding runtime validation to ensure the encryption type constants are properly configured in the environment.
constructor() { + if (!MultiFormatTypes.prefix.KMS_ENCRYPTED || !EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS) { + throw new Error('KMS encryption constants are not properly configured'); + } super(MultiFormatTypes.prefix.KMS_ENCRYPTED, EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS); }packages/types/src/epk-provider-types.ts (2)
1-3: Consider using type-only imports for better performanceSince this is a TypeScript type definition file, we should use type-only imports to ensure these imports are removed during compilation.
-import { CypherProviderTypes } from '.'; -import * as Encryption from './encryption-types'; -import * as Identity from './identity-types'; +import type { CypherProviderTypes } from '.'; +import type * as Encryption from './encryption-types'; +import type * as Identity from './identity-types';
5-10: Enhance documentation and type safetyThe interface could benefit from more detailed JSDoc documentation and stricter type definitions.
-/** EPK provider interface */ +/** + * EPK (Encryption Provider Key) interface that defines the contract for encryption providers. + * Extends the base cipher provider to add support for identity-based encryption methods. + */ export interface IEpkProvider extends CypherProviderTypes.ICypherProvider { - supportedMethods: Encryption.METHOD[]; - supportedIdentityTypes: Identity.TYPE[]; + /** List of encryption methods supported by this provider */ + readonly supportedMethods: readonly Encryption.METHOD[]; + /** List of identity types supported by this provider */ + readonly supportedIdentityTypes: readonly Identity.TYPE[]; + /** + * Checks if the given identity is registered with the encryption provider + * @param identity - The identity to verify + * @returns Promise resolving to true if the identity is registered + */ isIdentityRegistered: (identity: Identity.IIdentity) => Promise<boolean>; }packages/types/src/encryption-types.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-32: Documentation update needed for KMS method.Since we're adding a new encryption method, we should ensure it's properly documented.
Consider adding JSDoc comments to explain the KMS method in the enum, similar to this:
/** Supported encryption methods */ export enum METHOD { + /** Key Management Service (KMS) encryption using Lit Protocol */ KMS = 'kms', ECIES = 'ecies', AES256_CBC = 'aes256-cbc', AES256_GCM = 'aes256-gcm', }packages/types/src/cypher-provider-types.ts (2)
1-4: Enhance interface documentation with security considerationsWhile the documentation provides a basic overview, it should include:
- Security considerations and best practices
- Expected encryption standards/algorithms
- Error handling expectations
Add additional documentation:
/** * A generic interface for Key Management Service (KMS) providers. + * + * Security Considerations: + * - Implementations should use strong encryption algorithms + * - All errors should be caught and handled appropriately + * - Sensitive data should be properly sanitized before encryption + * - Memory should be cleared after encryption/decryption operations + * + * @throws {Error} When encryption/decryption operations fail */
1-20: Consider adding validation methods to the interfaceSince this interface is crucial for encryption operations, consider adding methods for validating encryption/decryption parameters.
Consider adding these methods to the interface:
/** * Validates encryption parameters before operation */ validateEncryptionParams(data: T, options: EncryptionOptions): void | never; /** * Validates decryption parameters before operation */ validateDecryptionParams( encryptedData: EncryptedData, options: DecryptionOptions ): void | never;This would ensure consistent validation across different implementations and improve security.
packages/types/src/index.ts (1)
6-6: Consider standardizing the spelling of 'Cypher' to 'Cipher'.While the code is functionally correct, the spelling 'Cypher' is non-standard in cryptography contexts where 'Cipher' is more commonly used. However, if this is an intentional choice across the codebase, please disregard this comment.
Also applies to: 10-10, 26-26, 30-30
packages/request-client.js/src/http-request-network.ts (1)
Line range hint
20-33: Add JSDoc documentation for cypherProvider parameterThe constructor's JSDoc comments should include documentation for the new
cypherProviderparameter to maintain consistency with other parameters.Add the following line to the JSDoc:
* @param options.signatureProvider Module to handle the signature. If not given it will be impossible to create new transaction (it requires to sign). * @param options.currencies custom currency list. * @param options.currencyManager custom currency manager (will override `currencies`). * @param options.skipPersistence allows creating a transaction without immediate persistence. + * @param options.cypherProvider Module to handle encryption operations using Lit Protocol. */packages/transaction-manager/README.md (3)
23-23: Documentation enhancement needed for Lit Protocol integrationWhile the import statement is correctly updated, considering this PR's objective of adding Lit Protocol support, it would be beneficial to include an example demonstrating the Lit Protocol integration alongside the existing ECIES example.
Consider adding a section like:
### Using Lit Protocol for encryption ```javascript import { LitProtocolProvider } from '@requestnetwork/lit-protocol'; // Example setup and usage of Lit Protocol provider--- `114-114`: **Consider adding a security notice about private keys in examples** While the import statement is correctly updated, the examples throughout the documentation use hardcoded private keys. Consider adding a security notice warning users against using hardcoded keys in production. Add a notice like: ```markdown > **Security Notice**: The private keys shown in these examples are for demonstration purposes only. Never use hardcoded private keys in production code.
Line range hint
1-1: Documentation needed for new featuresThe README is missing documentation for two major features mentioned in the PR:
- Lit Protocol integration and its configuration
- Capacity credits delegation functionality
Consider adding sections that cover:
- How to configure and use the Lit Protocol provider
- How capacity credits delegation works and its setup
- Any new parameters or options related to these features
Would you like assistance in drafting these new documentation sections?
packages/request-node/src/requestNode.ts (2)
164-167: Update NOT_FOUND_MESSAGE constantThe route registration looks good, but please update the
NOT_FOUND_MESSAGEconstant to include the new/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSigendpoint in the list of available endpoints.export const NOT_FOUND_MESSAGE = - 'Not found\nAvailable endpoints:\n/POST persistTransaction\n/GET getTransactionsByChannelId\n/GET getChannelsByTopic\n/POST /ipfsAdd\nGET getConfirmedTransaction\nGET status'; + 'Not found\nAvailable endpoints:\n/POST persistTransaction\n/GET getTransactionsByChannelId\n/GET getChannelsByTopic\n/POST /ipfsAdd\nGET getConfirmedTransaction\nGET status\nGET getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig';
Line range hint
1-195: Consider error handling and rate limitingSince this endpoint is part of the authentication flow for Lit Protocol capacity delegation, consider implementing:
- Rate limiting to prevent abuse
- Appropriate error handling and status codes
- Request validation middleware
- Logging of authentication attempts (success/failure)
This will help ensure the security and reliability of the Lit Protocol integration.
packages/transaction-manager/src/channel-parser.ts (1)
Line range hint
195-201: Consider enhancing error handling specificityWhile the optional chaining improves robustness, consider making the error handling more specific:
- Extract the error message prefix to a constant
- Add type narrowing for the error object
- Consider logging the encryption method for debugging
+const DECRYPT_ERROR_PREFIX = 'Impossible to decrypt the channel key from this transaction'; + +interface DecryptionError extends Error { + message: string; +} + if ( - error?.message?.startsWith( - 'Impossible to decrypt the channel key from this transaction', - ) && + error instanceof Error && + error.message.startsWith(DECRYPT_ERROR_PREFIX) && result.channelType === TransactionTypes.ChannelType.UNKNOWN ) { result.channelType = TransactionTypes.ChannelType.ENCRYPTED; result.encryptionMethod = timestampedTransaction.transaction.encryptionMethod; + console.debug(`Channel encryption method set to: ${result.encryptionMethod}`); }packages/transaction-manager/src/transaction-manager.ts (1)
22-31: Consider architectural improvements for encryption handlingTo improve the robustness of the encryption integration:
- Add JSDoc comments explaining the cypherProvider's role and requirements
- Consider implementing a consistent error handling strategy for encryption operations
- Add logging for encryption operations to aid debugging
- Consider implementing a provider capability check method
Example documentation:
/** * Optional encryption provider implementing ICypherProvider interface. * Used for encrypting new transactions and managing encryption keys. * @see ICypherProvider for implementation requirements */ private cypherProvider?: CypherProviderTypes.ICypherProvider;packages/request-client.js/src/http-data-access.ts (1)
208-212: Enhance method documentationThe JSDoc comments should provide more details about:
- The purpose of capacity delegation
- The format and requirements for delegateeAddress
- The structure of the returned AuthSig
- Possible error scenarios
/** * Gets the Lit Protocol capacity delegation auth sig from the node through HTTP. * - * @param delegateeAddress the address of the delegatee + * @description Retrieves an authorization signature for Lit Protocol capacity delegation. + * This allows the delegatee to use the delegator's capacity credits for encryption/decryption. + * + * @param delegateeAddress The Ethereum address of the account receiving the delegation + * @returns Promise<DataAccessTypes.AuthSig> The authorization signature object + * @throws {Error} If the delegateeAddress is invalid or the request fails + * @throws {Error} If the node is unable to generate the authorization signature */packages/epk-cypher/test/ethereum-private-key-cypher-provider.test.ts (2)
153-170: Enhance encryption test coverageThe encrypt test suite only covers the happy path. Consider adding tests for:
- Edge cases (empty data, large data)
- Error scenarios (invalid encryption parameters)
- Different data types
Example test case:
it('should handle empty data encryption', async () => { const decryptionProvider = new EthereumPrivateKeyCypherProvider(id1Raw.decryptionParams); const emptyData = ''; const encryptedData = await decryptionProvider.encrypt(emptyData, { encryptionParams: id1Raw.encryptionParams, }); expect(encryptedData.value.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); expect( await decryptionProvider.decrypt(encryptedData, { identity: id1Raw.identity, }), ).toEqual(emptyData); });
64-64: Improve test descriptions for better clarityThe test descriptions could be more specific about what they're testing. Consider using a more descriptive format: "should [expected behavior] when [condition]"
Examples:
-it('cannot construct with decryption parameter not supported' +it('should throw error when constructing with unsupported decryption method' -it('cannot addDecryptionParameters if method not supported' +it('should throw error when adding decryption parameters with unsupported method' -it('cannot decrypt if encryption not supported' +it('should throw error when decrypting data with unsupported encryption method'Also applies to: 103-103, 127-127, 188-188, 199-199, 211-211
packages/request-client.js/src/api/request-network.ts (1)
53-67: Consider implementing a CypherProvider factoryThe current implementation allows for flexible cypher provider injection, which is good. However, as this is part of the Lit Protocol integration, consider implementing a factory pattern for cypher providers to:
- Standardize provider creation
- Encapsulate provider-specific configuration
- Make it easier to add more providers in the future
This would improve modularity and make the integration of new encryption providers more straightforward.
packages/request-node/src/request/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig.ts (1)
46-49: Use a more appropriate HTTP status code when no tokens are foundReturning
UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY (422)when no existing tokens are found may not accurately represent the error condition. Consider usingNOT_FOUND (404)orBAD_REQUEST (400)to better reflect the situation.packages/epk-cypher/src/ethereum-private-key-cypher-provider.ts (3)
15-15: Typo in comment: 'method' should be pluralized to 'methods'In the comment on line 15, "list of supported encryption method" should be "list of supported encryption methods" for grammatical correctness.
58-63: Improve type definitions in 'decrypt' method parametersCurrently, the
decryptmethod'soptionsparameter is implicitly typed. Explicitly defining its type enhances clarity and type safety.Consider updating the method signature:
- public async decrypt( + public async decrypt( encryptedData: EncryptionTypes.IEncryptedData, options: { identity: IdentityTypes.IIdentity; }, ): Promise<string> {Alternatively, define an interface for
optionsif it will be reused.
90-94: Optimize 'isIdentityRegistered' method by checking the map directlyInstead of iterating through all keys, you can directly check if the identity exists in the map. This increases efficiency.
Apply this diff for optimization:
public async isIdentityRegistered(identity: IdentityTypes.IIdentity): Promise<boolean> { - return Array.from(this.decryptionParametersDictionary.keys()).some( - (address) => identity.value.toLowerCase() === address.toLowerCase(), - ); + return this.decryptionParametersDictionary.has(identity.value.toLowerCase()); }packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-parser.ts (1)
142-142: Rename 'encryptResponse' to 'encryptedChannelKey' for clarityThe variable
encryptResponseholds the encrypted channel key data that needs to be decrypted. Renaming it toencryptedChannelKeyimproves readability and more accurately reflects its purpose.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
-const encryptResponse = JSON.parse(MultiFormat.deserialize(entries[0][1]).value); +const encryptedChannelKey = JSON.parse(MultiFormat.deserialize(entries[0][1]).value); ... -channelKey = await this.cypherProvider.decrypt(encryptResponse, { +channelKey = await this.cypherProvider.decrypt(encryptedChannelKey, { encryptionParams, });packages/lit-protocol-cypher/src/lit-protocol-cypher-provider.ts (2)
195-226: Reuse access control conditions when encrypting data.The
encryptmethod constructs access control conditions each time it's called. If the encryption parameters remain the same, consider caching the access control conditions to improve performance.
248-250: Provide a method to obtain session signatures if not already available.In the
decryptmethod, ifthis.sessionSigsis null, an error is thrown. Consider prompting the user to establish a session or automatically initiating the session signature retrieval process.packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (3)
128-129: Provide More Informative Error Message WhencypherProviderIs MissingThe error message
'No cypher provider given'may not clearly indicate the requirement. Enhance the error message to specify that acypherProvideris necessary when encryption parameters use the KMS method.Apply this diff to improve clarity:
- throw new Error('No cypher provider given'); + throw new Error('Cypher provider is required when using KMS encryption method');
92-96: Add Error Handling for Encryption FailuresCurrently, if the
encryptfunction throws an error, it will propagate up the call stack. Consider wrapping the encryption calls in try-catch blocks to provide more informative error messages and handle exceptions gracefully.Example adjustment:
- const encryptedKey: EncryptionTypes.IEncryptedData = await encrypt( - symmetricKey, - encryptionParam, - ); + let encryptedKey: EncryptionTypes.IEncryptedData; + try { + encryptedKey = await encrypt(symmetricKey, encryptionParam); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to encrypt key for identity ${multiFormattedIdentity}: ${error.message}`); + }Also applies to: 221-225
82-97: Optimize Asynchronous Encryption Parameter MappingMapping over
encryptionParamswith anasyncfunction and then usingPromise.allis correct but could be optimized for readability. Consider using synchronous mappings if possible or abstracting this into a separate utility function.Also applies to: 208-227
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (44)
packages/epk-cypher/.nycrc(1 hunks)packages/epk-cypher/.vscode/settings.json(1 hunks)packages/epk-cypher/README.md(1 hunks)packages/epk-cypher/jest.config.js(1 hunks)packages/epk-cypher/package.json(1 hunks)packages/epk-cypher/src/ethereum-private-key-cypher-provider.ts(1 hunks)packages/epk-cypher/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/epk-cypher/test/ethereum-private-key-cypher-provider.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/epk-cypher/tsconfig.build.json(1 hunks)packages/epk-cypher/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)packages/epk-cypher/webpack.config.js(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cypher/.nycrc(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cypher/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cypher/LICENSE(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cypher/README.md(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cypher/jest.config.js(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cypher/package.json(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cypher/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cypher/src/lit-protocol-cypher-provider.ts(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cypher/test/index.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cypher/tsconfig.build.json(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cypher/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)packages/multi-format/src/encryption/encryption-format.ts(1 hunks)packages/multi-format/src/encryption/kms-format.ts(1 hunks)packages/request-client.js/src/api/request-network.ts(2 hunks)packages/request-client.js/src/http-data-access.ts(1 hunks)packages/request-client.js/src/http-request-network.ts(4 hunks)packages/request-node/package.json(1 hunks)packages/request-node/src/request/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig.ts(1 hunks)packages/request-node/src/requestNode.ts(4 hunks)packages/smart-contracts/package.json(2 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/README.md(3 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/src/channel-parser.ts(3 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/src/transaction-manager.ts(3 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts(5 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-parser.ts(3 hunks)packages/types/package.json(1 hunks)packages/types/src/cypher-provider-types.ts(1 hunks)packages/types/src/data-access-types.ts(3 hunks)packages/types/src/encryption-types.ts(1 hunks)packages/types/src/epk-provider-types.ts(1 hunks)packages/types/src/index.ts(2 hunks)packages/types/src/multi-format-types.ts(1 hunks)packages/utils/src/encryption.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (19)
- packages/epk-cypher/.nycrc
- packages/epk-cypher/.vscode/settings.json
- packages/epk-cypher/jest.config.js
- packages/epk-cypher/package.json
- packages/epk-cypher/src/index.ts
- packages/epk-cypher/tsconfig.build.json
- packages/epk-cypher/tsconfig.json
- packages/epk-cypher/webpack.config.js
- packages/lit-protocol-cypher/.nycrc
- packages/lit-protocol-cypher/CHANGELOG.md
- packages/lit-protocol-cypher/LICENSE
- packages/lit-protocol-cypher/README.md
- packages/lit-protocol-cypher/jest.config.js
- packages/lit-protocol-cypher/package.json
- packages/lit-protocol-cypher/src/index.ts
- packages/lit-protocol-cypher/test/index.test.ts
- packages/lit-protocol-cypher/tsconfig.build.json
- packages/lit-protocol-cypher/tsconfig.json
- packages/utils/src/encryption.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
packages/epk-cypher/README.md
26-26: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
packages/epk-cypher/test/ethereum-private-key-cypher-provider.test.ts
8-8: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
12-12: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
19-19: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
27-27: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
31-31: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
38-38: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 Biome
packages/epk-cypher/test/ethereum-private-key-cypher-provider.test.ts
[error] 4-22: Do not export from a test file.
(lint/suspicious/noExportsInTest)
[error] 23-41: Do not export from a test file.
(lint/suspicious/noExportsInTest)
🔇 Additional comments (40)
packages/multi-format/src/encryption/kms-format.ts (1)
8-12: Verify the completeness of the KMS implementation
The class currently only provides basic initialization without additional methods for encryption/decryption operations. Let's verify if this minimal implementation is sufficient.
packages/types/src/epk-provider-types.ts (2)
6-10: Well-structured interface design
The interface effectively extends ICypherProvider and clearly defines the contract for EPK providers. The separation of supported methods, identity types, and registration verification aligns well with the PR's objective of implementing Lit Protocol encryption.
6-6: Verify ICypherProvider interface implementation
Let's ensure the base interface exists and contains the required encryption methods.
✅ Verification successful
ICypherProvider interface is properly defined with encryption methods
The ICypherProvider interface exists in packages/types/src/cypher-provider-types.ts and contains the required encryption methods:
encrypt(data: any, options: any): Promise<any>decrypt(encryptedData: any, options: any): Promise<any>
The interface extension in IEpkProvider is valid and correctly inherits these encryption capabilities.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ICypherProvider interface definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface ICypherProvider {
$$$
}'
# Backup: Search using ripgrep if the file is not in TypeScript
rg -l "interface ICypherProvider"
Length of output: 1581
packages/multi-format/src/encryption/encryption-format.ts (2)
5-5: LGTM! Import follows the established pattern.
The import statement follows the existing pattern of importing format implementations.
8-8: Verify KMSMultiFormat implementation and format order.
The addition of KMSMultiFormat as the first format in the array could have implications for format selection. Let's verify the implementation details and format selection logic.
Consider documenting the format selection strategy and the rationale for placing KMSMultiFormat first in the array. This ordering might affect which format gets selected when multiple formats are available.
packages/types/src/encryption-types.ts (1)
27-27: LGTM! Verify impact on existing consumers.
The addition of the KMS method to the enum follows consistent naming patterns. However, as this is a type change, we should verify its impact.
Let's check for direct enum usage in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to search for the usage patterns:
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
KMS method addition is safe and follows established patterns
The addition of the KMS method to the encryption types follows the existing patterns and is properly integrated:
- The enum value uses consistent naming (uppercase
KMS) - The string value follows the pattern (lowercase
'kms') - The KMS method is already being used in the codebase:
- In transaction-manager for hybrid encryption:
${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS}-${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.AES256_GCM} - Has dedicated format handling in
packages/multi-format/src/encryption/kms-format.ts - Proper error handling for method validation exists
- In transaction-manager for hybrid encryption:
The change is non-breaking since:
- It's an enum extension (additive change)
- Existing code explicitly checks for supported methods
- KMS handling is properly isolated in dedicated components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for direct usage of METHOD enum to identify potential breaking changes
# Look for both the enum type and string literals
echo "Checking for METHOD enum usage..."
rg -t typescript "METHOD\." -A 2
echo "Checking for method string literals..."
rg -t typescript "'(ecies|aes256-cbc|aes256-gcm)'" -A 2
echo "Checking for type checking or switch statements on METHOD..."
ast-grep --pattern 'switch ($x) { $$$case METHOD.$$$: $$$ }'
Length of output: 526
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for METHOD enum usage and string literals without typescript filter
echo "Checking for METHOD enum usage..."
rg "METHOD\." -A 2
echo "Checking for encryption method string literals..."
rg "'(ecies|aes256-cbc|aes256-gcm|kms)'" -A 2
echo "Checking files containing encryption-related code..."
fd -e ts -e js | grep -i "encrypt"
Length of output: 75313
packages/types/src/cypher-provider-types.ts (1)
4-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety with generic parameters and specific types
The interface uses any types extensively, which bypasses TypeScript's type checking benefits. Consider using generic types and defining specific option interfaces.
Consider this implementation:
-export interface ICypherProvider {
+export interface EncryptionOptions {
+ // Add specific encryption options
+ algorithm?: string;
+ keySize?: number;
+}
+
+export interface DecryptionOptions {
+ // Add specific decryption options
+ algorithm?: string;
+}
+
+export interface ICypherProvider<T = unknown> {
/**
* Encrypts the given data.
* @param data - The data to encrypt.
* @param options - Any additional options required for encryption.
* @returns A Promise that resolves to an object containing the encrypted data and any necessary metadata.
+ * @throws {Error} If encryption fails
*/
- encrypt(data: any, options: any): Promise<any>;
+ encrypt(data: T, options: EncryptionOptions): Promise<{
+ encryptedData: string;
+ metadata: {
+ algorithm: string;
+ version: string;
+ [key: string]: unknown;
+ };
+ }>;
/**
* Decrypts the given encrypted data.
* @param encryptedData - The encrypted data to decrypt.
* @param options - Any additional options required for decryption.
* @returns A Promise that resolves to the decrypted data.
+ * @throws {Error} If decryption fails
*/
- decrypt(encryptedData: any, options: any): Promise<any>;
+ decrypt(
+ encryptedData: {
+ encryptedData: string;
+ metadata: {
+ algorithm: string;
+ version: string;
+ [key: string]: unknown;
+ };
+ },
+ options: DecryptionOptions
+ ): Promise<T>;
}This change:
- Introduces type safety with generics
- Defines specific option interfaces
- Adds structured return types
- Documents error cases
Let's verify the impact on existing implementations:
packages/types/package.json (2)
41-41: Verify @lit-protocol/types version selection
Let's verify if version 6.11.0 is the most appropriate version to use.
#!/bin/bash
# Check latest version and release dates
echo "Checking @lit-protocol/types versions..."
npm view @lit-protocol/types versions --json | jq -r '.[-5:]'
npm view @lit-protocol/types time --json | jq 'with_entries(select(.key|match("^6.11";"")))'
# Check for breaking changes in release notes
echo "Checking release notes for breaking changes..."
gh release list --repo lit-protocol/js-sdk --limit 1041-42: Verify peer dependencies
Let's check if @lit-protocol/types has any peer dependencies that need to be added to package.json.
✅ Verification successful
No peer dependency issues found
Based on the npm registry checks and attempts to verify peer dependencies, no peer dependencies were reported for @lit-protocol/types@6.11.0. The ethers dependency version 5.7.2 appears to be compatible as no specific version constraints were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for peer dependencies
echo "Checking peer dependencies for @lit-protocol/types..."
npm view @lit-protocol/types peerDependencies --json
# Check if ethers version 5.7.2 is compatible
echo "Checking ethers compatibility..."
npm view @lit-protocol/types@6.11.0 peerDependencies.ethers
Length of output: 771
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package.json of @lit-protocol/types directly from their repository
echo "Checking package.json from lit-protocol/js-sdk repository..."
curl -s "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LIT-Protocol/js-sdk/main/packages/types/package.json" | jq '.peerDependencies'
# Also check if there are any dependencies that might give us a clue
echo "Checking dependencies..."
curl -s "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LIT-Protocol/js-sdk/main/packages/types/package.json" | jq '.dependencies'
Length of output: 553
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach by checking the installed package directly
echo "Checking package contents..."
npm install --no-save @lit-protocol/types@6.11.0
cat node_modules/@lit-protocol/types/package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "peerDependencies"
Length of output: 1272
packages/types/src/multi-format-types.ts (2)
17-18: Consider updating documentation for the new format.
While the inline documentation is clear, consider updating any relevant README files or API documentation to include details about:
- The KMS encryption format structure
- How it relates to the Lit Protocol integration
- Migration guidelines for existing users
Let's check for documentation files that might need updates:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find documentation files that might need updates
# for the new KMS encryption format
# Search for relevant documentation files
fd -e md -e mdx | xargs rg -l "encryption|format|prefix"17-18: LGTM! Verify prefix uniqueness.
The new KMS encrypted data prefix follows the existing pattern and is logically grouped with other encryption methods.
Let's verify that '05' isn't used elsewhere in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
This should help us find any potential conflicts with the '05' prefix across the codebase, including both direct string literals and enum values.
✅ Prefix '05' is unique and correctly placed
The prefix '05' for KMS_ENCRYPTED is only used in multi-format-types.ts and follows the sequential numbering after AES256_GCM_ENCRYPTED ('04'). No conflicts found in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any other occurrences of '05' being used as a prefix
# to ensure there are no conflicts with the new KMS_ENCRYPTED prefix
# Search for prefix declarations or uses of '05'
rg -g '*.{ts,js}' "prefix.*['\"]05['\"]|['\"]05['\"].*prefix"
Length of output: 1776
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for '05' prefix usage
# Search in TypeScript and JavaScript files for any '05' string patterns
rg -g '*.{ts,js}' "'05'|\"05\"" -C 2
# Also search specifically in multi-format related files
fd -e ts -e js "format|prefix" --exec rg -l "'05'|\"05\"" {}
Length of output: 478
packages/types/src/index.ts (2)
26-26: LGTM! Verify the usage of new provider types.
The new exports are properly integrated and maintain consistent ordering.
Let's verify how these new types are being used in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of the new provider types across the codebase
echo "Checking usage of CypherProviderTypes:"
rg -t typescript "CypherProviderTypes" --glob '!packages/types/src/index.ts'
echo -e "\nChecking usage of EpkProviderTypes:"
rg -t typescript "EpkProviderTypes" --glob '!packages/types/src/index.ts'
# Check for any potential interfaces implementing these types
echo -e "\nChecking for implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements $$$CypherProvider$$$'Also applies to: 30-30
6-6: LGTM! Verify the new type definition files exist.
The new imports follow the established patterns and naming conventions.
Let's verify the existence and content of the new type definition files:
Also applies to: 10-10
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the existence of these files.
✅ Both type definition files exist and are properly structured
The files are present at the expected locations with well-defined interfaces:
packages/types/src/epk-provider-types.ts: DefinesIEpkProviderinterface extendingICypherProviderpackages/types/src/cypher-provider-types.ts: Defines baseICypherProviderinterface for KMS providers
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and basic structure of the new type files
# Check if the files exist and show their content
echo "Checking epk-provider-types.ts:"
cat packages/types/src/epk-provider-types.ts 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found"
echo -e "\nChecking cypher-provider-types.ts:"
cat packages/types/src/cypher-provider-types.ts 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found"
Length of output: 533
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Use fd to find the files and then cat their contents
echo "Searching for epk-provider-types.ts:"
fd "epk-provider-types.ts" --type f
echo -e "\nSearching for cypher-provider-types.ts:"
fd "cypher-provider-types.ts" --type f
# If files are found, show their contents
if fd "epk-provider-types.ts" --type f -X cat; then
echo -e "\nContents of epk-provider-types.ts found"
else
echo -e "\nNo epk-provider-types.ts content"
fi
if fd "cypher-provider-types.ts" --type f -X cat; then
echo -e "\nContents of cypher-provider-types.ts found"
else
echo -e "\nNo cypher-provider-types.ts content"
fi
Length of output: 1753
packages/request-node/package.json (2)
45-47: LGTM! Good practice with consistent version pinning.
All three Lit Protocol packages are consistently pinned to version 6.11.0, which is good for reproducibility and avoiding version mismatches between related packages.
45-47: Verify Lit Protocol package versions and security implications.
Let's verify if version 6.11.0 is the latest stable version and check for any security advisories.
✅ Verification successful
Lit Protocol package versions are up-to-date and secure
The verification shows that:
- All packages are using the latest stable version (6.11.0)
- No security vulnerabilities were found in the GitHub Security Advisory Database
- No peer dependency conflicts exist
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest versions and security advisories for Lit Protocol packages
echo "Checking latest versions from npm registry..."
for package in "@lit-protocol/constants" "@lit-protocol/contracts-sdk" "@lit-protocol/lit-node-client"; do
echo "Package: $package"
curl -s "https://registry.npmjs.org/$package" | jq -r '.["dist-tags"].latest'
done
echo -e "\nChecking for security advisories..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "lit-protocol") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
echo -e "\nChecking for peer dependencies..."
for package in "@lit-protocol/constants" "@lit-protocol/contracts-sdk" "@lit-protocol/lit-node-client"; do
echo "Package: $package"
curl -s "https://registry.npmjs.org/$package/6.11.0" | jq '.peerDependencies'
done
Length of output: 2343
packages/smart-contracts/package.json (1)
75-76: Verify compatibility with major TypeChain version updates
The significant version jumps in TypeChain-related packages (@typechain/ethers-v5, @typechain/hardhat, and typechain) might introduce breaking changes that could affect type generation for smart contracts.
Let's verify the impact and compatibility:
Consider:
- Review the migration guides for breaking changes
- Ensure all TypeChain-generated files are regenerated after the upgrade
- Verify that the types work correctly with ethers v5 (since @typechain/ethers-v5 is being used)
Also applies to: 87-87
✅ Verification successful
TypeChain upgrade appears safe to proceed
The verification shows a well-configured TypeChain setup:
- TypeChain is properly configured in hardhat.config.ts with ethers-v5 target
- Generated types are managed through build scripts with proper cleaning
- No direct TypeChain imports in the codebase besides configuration
- Types are generated to
src/typesand copied to appropriate locations during build
The upgrade should work smoothly as:
- The project uses standard TypeChain configuration
- Build scripts handle type generation and cleanup appropriately
- The ethers-v5 target matches the TypeChain package being used
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in TypeChain packages and verify compatibility
# Check if there are any TypeChain-generated files that might need updates
echo "Searching for TypeChain-generated files..."
fd -e ts -e d.ts --exec grep -l "typechain" {}
# Look for TypeChain usage in the codebase
echo "Checking TypeChain usage patterns..."
rg --type typescript "import.*typechain" -A 3
# Check if the build script has been run after the upgrade
echo "Checking recent builds..."
fd "tsconfig.tsbuildinfo|tsconfig.build.tsbuildinfo" -t f -d 1
Length of output: 480
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the hardhat config and any TypeChain-related configurations
echo "=== Checking hardhat.config.ts ==="
cat packages/smart-contracts/hardhat.config.ts
# Look for TypeChain imports and usage with ripgrep (fixing previous command)
echo -e "\n=== Checking TypeChain imports and usage ==="
rg "import.*typechain"
# Check for any TypeChain-generated directories
echo -e "\n=== Looking for TypeChain artifacts ==="
fd "typechain|typechain-types"
# Check package.json for related scripts
echo -e "\n=== Checking build scripts in package.json ==="
cat packages/smart-contracts/package.json | grep -A 5 '"scripts":'
Length of output: 13158
packages/request-client.js/src/http-request-network.ts (1)
35-35: LGTM! Implementation aligns with PR objectives
The addition of the optional cypherProvider parameter is well-structured and follows the existing patterns in the codebase. The implementation correctly:
- Adds the parameter to the constructor
- Properly types it with
CypherProviderTypes.ICypherProvider - Passes it through to the parent class
Let's verify the integration with the parent class:
Also applies to: 45-45, 76-76
✅ Verification successful
Implementation verified - cypherProvider correctly integrated
The verification confirms that:
- The parent
RequestNetworkclass properly acceptscypherProviderin its constructor parameters - The
cypherProvideris correctly passed to theTransactionManagerwhere it's utilized - The inheritance chain from
HttpRequestNetworktoRequestNetworkensures the parameter flows through as expected
The implementation aligns with the codebase patterns and is properly integrated with the parent class.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the parent class RequestNetwork's constructor accepts cypherProvider
# Search for the RequestNetwork class definition and constructor
ast-grep --pattern 'class RequestNetwork {
constructor($params) {
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the parent class and constructor
# First, let's find all files that might contain RequestNetwork class
fd -e ts -e js | xargs rg "class RequestNetwork" -A 10
# Also search for any imports of RequestNetwork to understand the inheritance
rg "import.*RequestNetwork" -A 2
Length of output: 38726
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the constructor of RequestNetwork class and its usage of cypherProvider
rg "constructor.*\{" packages/request-client.js/src/api/request-network.ts -A 10
# Also check the HttpRequestNetwork class that's adding the cypherProvider parameter
rg "class HttpRequestNetwork" packages/request-client.js/src/http-request-network.ts -A 10
Length of output: 1475
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual constructor implementation of HttpRequestNetwork to see how cypherProvider is passed
rg "constructor.*\{" packages/request-client.js/src/http-request-network.ts -A 20
# Also check if cypherProvider is used in the parent class
rg "cypherProvider" packages/request-client.js/src/api/request-network.ts -A 5
Length of output: 1007
packages/types/src/data-access-types.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM! Well-structured type definitions for Lit Protocol integration.
The new optional method getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig in IDataAccess interface is well-designed:
- Optional nature (
?) maintains backward compatibility - Clear parameter and return types
- Follows existing naming conventions
Also applies to: 36-36
166-166: LGTM! Appropriate re-export of AuthSig type.
Re-exporting AuthSig makes it conveniently available to consumers of this types package.
packages/transaction-manager/README.md (2)
20-20: LGTM: Package reference correctly updated
The reference to the example implementation package has been properly updated from epk-decryption to epk-cypher.
90-90: LGTM: Import statement correctly updated
The import statement has been properly updated to use the new package name while maintaining the same functionality.
packages/request-node/src/requestNode.ts (3)
15-15: LGTM: Import statement follows established patterns
The import statement follows the existing patterns and naming conventions used throughout the file.
50-50: LGTM: Member variable follows class structure
The private member variable declaration follows the established pattern and is properly grouped with other handler declarations.
79-81: Verify handler dependencies
The handler is initialized with only the logger parameter, while other handlers in the class receive additional dependencies. Please verify that the GetLitCapacityDelegationAuthSigHandler doesn't require access to dataAccess or other services for capacity delegation functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the handler implementation shown in the results, I can now generate the final response:
Handler dependencies are correctly configured
The GetLitCapacityDelegationAuthSigHandler only requires the logger dependency as it:
- Uses external clients (
LitContracts,LitNodeClient) that are instantiated within the handler - Retrieves configuration via the global
configobject - Does not need access to data stores or other services
The current initialization with just the logger parameter is appropriate for its functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the handler implementation to verify required dependencies
ast-grep --pattern 'class GetLitCapacityDelegationAuthSigHandler {
constructor($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 6217
packages/transaction-manager/src/channel-parser.ts (2)
Line range hint 1-20: LGTM: Clean implementation of the cypher provider integration
The changes maintain backward compatibility while extending the functionality to support the new Lit Protocol integration. The TypeScript types are properly imported and used.
Line range hint 141-141: Address the TODO comment about removing channelId parameter
The TODO comment suggests removing the channelId parameter, but this needs verification before removal.
Let's check the usage of this parameter:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results and generate additional verification scripts to ensure we have a complete picture.
The channelId parameter can be safely removed
The verification shows that:
- The parameter is already prefixed with
_indicating it's unused - No references to
_channelIdexist within the method implementation - The parameter is only documented in JSDoc but not used in the logic
- All calls to this method pass the
channelIdbut don't depend on any return value related to it
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to getChannelTypeAndChannelKey method
rg -A 5 "getChannelTypeAndChannelKey" --type ts
# Search for any other usage of channelId in similar contexts
ast-grep --pattern 'channelId: string'
Length of output: 5298
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if channelId is used within the getChannelTypeAndChannelKey method implementation
rg -A 10 "getChannelTypeAndChannelKey.*\{" --type ts
# Check for any references to _channelId within the method
rg "_channelId" --type ts
Length of output: 1433
packages/transaction-manager/src/transaction-manager.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Clean integration of cypher provider types
The import and property declaration follow the existing patterns and are properly typed.
Also applies to: 22-22
27-27: Verify constructor calls across the codebase
The constructor changes look good and maintain backward compatibility. However, we should verify that all instantiations of TransactionManager have been updated appropriately.
Also applies to: 30-31
✅ Verification successful
All constructor calls are correctly updated
The verification shows that all instantiations of TransactionManager across the codebase are correctly using the constructor parameters:
- Test files appropriately use both single-parameter (dataAccess) and two-parameter (dataAccess, decryptionProvider) versions
- Usage examples demonstrate correct usage with both encrypted and clear requests
- The only instance passing the new cypherProvider parameter is in request-client.js, which is the expected implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for TransactionManager instantiations
ast-grep --pattern 'new TransactionManager($$$)'
Length of output: 7169
packages/request-client.js/src/http-data-access.ts (1)
213-217: Verify the integration with Lit Protocol
The method is part of the Lit Protocol integration. Let's verify the related components and dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the implementation details and type definitions to ensure proper integration.
Integration with Lit Protocol is properly implemented and verified
The implementation shows a complete and correct integration:
- The
getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSigendpoint is properly implemented in the request node with proper error handling - The AuthSig type is correctly imported from '@lit-protocol/types'
- The method is used correctly in the Lit Protocol cypher provider for capacity delegation
- The implementation includes proper connection to Lit nodes, token verification, and delegation setup
Key verified components:
- Request node handler creates delegation with 10-minute expiration
- Lit Protocol cypher provider uses the auth signature for session management
- Type definitions are properly shared across packages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Lit Protocol integration components
# Check for Lit Protocol related files and types
echo "Checking for Lit Protocol related files..."
fd -e ts -e js "lit|capacity|delegation|auth"
# Check for AuthSig type definition
echo "Checking AuthSig type definition..."
rg -A 5 "interface AuthSig"
# Check for other usage of getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig
echo "Checking usage of getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig..."
rg "getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig"
Length of output: 1779
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of GetLitCapacityDelegationAuthSigHandler
echo "Checking GetLitCapacityDelegationAuthSigHandler implementation..."
cat packages/request-node/src/request/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig.ts
# Check AuthSig type definition in types package
echo "Checking AuthSig type definition..."
cat packages/types/src/data-access-types.ts
# Check Lit Protocol integration implementation
echo "Checking Lit Protocol integration..."
cat packages/lit-protocol-cypher/src/lit-protocol-cypher-provider.ts
Length of output: 16872
packages/epk-cypher/test/ethereum-private-key-cypher-provider.test.ts (1)
48-242: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage
The test suite provides thorough coverage of the EthereumPrivateKeyCypherProvider class functionality:
- Constructor validation
- Decryption parameter management
- Encryption/decryption operations
- Identity registration checks
- Error handling scenarios
The tests are well-structured and follow good testing practices.
packages/request-client.js/src/api/request-network.ts (3)
9-9: LGTM: Import addition follows established patterns
The addition of CypherProviderTypes import aligns with the existing type import structure.
53-53: LGTM: Constructor parameter addition is well-structured
The cypherProvider parameter is properly added as an optional parameter with correct typing, maintaining consistency with existing patterns.
Also applies to: 60-60
67-67: Verify documentation and usage updates for TransactionManager changes
The addition of cypherProvider to TransactionManager initialization represents a breaking change.
Let's verify the documentation and usage updates:
packages/request-node/src/request/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig.ts (2)
57-64: Verify the parameter types for 'uses' and 'expiration'
The uses parameter is provided as a string ('1'), but the createCapacityDelegationAuthSig method may expect a numeric value. Similarly, ensure that expiration is formatted correctly and consider any timezone implications.
31-33: Ensure consistent network configurations
There may be a mismatch between the JSON RPC provider network LIT_RPC.CHRONICLE_YELLOWSTONE and the LitNetwork.DatilTest used in LitContracts and LitNodeClient. Please verify that these network configurations are intended to be the same or adjust accordingly to prevent potential connectivity issues.
Also applies to: 36-38, 51-53
packages/epk-cypher/src/ethereum-private-key-cypher-provider.ts (2)
135-135: Consider handling case sensitivity consistently when deleting identities
Ensure that the identity.value is consistently handled in terms of case sensitivity during deletion for reliable functionality.
73-74: Ensure consistent case handling when accessing the decryption parameters
When retrieving decryption parameters, the identity value is converted to lowercase. Ensure that all identity values are stored and accessed in a consistent case to prevent mismatches.
Run this script to check for inconsistencies in identity casing:
packages/lit-protocol-cypher/src/lit-protocol-cypher-provider.ts (1)
75-76: Verify that disconnectWeb3() properly disconnects the wallet.
Ensure that the disconnectWeb3() function effectively disconnects the user's wallet and cleans up any associated resources. Additionally, consider handling any potential errors that might occur during disconnection.
You can run the following script to check if the function properly disconnects:
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (2)
109-116: Handle Potential Key Overwrites in keys Dictionary
When constructing the keys dictionary, using multiFormattedIdentity as the key may lead to overwriting if there are duplicate identities. Ensure that each identity is unique or adjust the logic to handle duplicates appropriately.
Run the following script to check for duplicates:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Identify potential duplicates in `multiFormattedIdentity`.
rg 'MultiFormat\.serialize\(.*\)' packages/transaction-manager/src/ | sort | uniq -dVerify that multiFormattedIdentity values are unique for each encryption parameter.
Also applies to: 238-245
91-96: Ensure Correct Usage of the encrypt Function
When cypherProvider is not provided, the encrypt function is called directly. Verify that the encrypt function accepts single encryption parameters and that the parameters match the expected signature.
Run the following script to check the encrypt function's signature:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the definition and usage of the `encrypt` function.
rg -A 5 'export async function encrypt\(' packages/transaction-manager/src/Confirm that the function can handle the provided parameters correctly.
Also applies to: 222-226
packages/epk-cypher/test/ethereum-private-key-cypher-provider.test.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/request-node/src/request/getLitCapacityDelegationAuthSig.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.circleci/config.yml(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.circleci/config.yml (1)
314-343: LGTM! The new test jobs are well-structured.
The new test jobs for epk-cipher and lit-protocol-cipher follow the established patterns in the configuration, including proper workspace setup, build steps, test execution with appropriate parameters, and test result storage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts (2)
43-49: Consider improving type safety in mock implementationsWhile the mocks are functional, the type casting using
unknowncould be made more type-safe by explicitly defining the mock interfaces.Consider this approach for better type safety:
interface MockLitNodeClient extends Partial<LitJsSdk.LitNodeClient> { connect: jest.Mock; disconnect: jest.Mock; getLatestBlockhash: jest.Mock; getSessionSigs: jest.Mock; } const mockLitClient: MockLitNodeClient = { connect: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(null), disconnect: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(null), getLatestBlockhash: jest.fn().mockReturnValue('mock-blockhash'), getSessionSigs: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({ 'mock-session': 'mock-sig' }) }; interface MockSigner extends Partial<Signer> { getAddress: jest.Mock; signMessage: jest.Mock; } const mockSigner: MockSigner = { getAddress: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(mockWalletAddress), signMessage: jest.fn().mockReturnValue('mock-signature') };Also applies to: 56-60
1-210: Add JSDoc documentation and organize tests by functionalityWhile the test organization is good, adding documentation and grouping related tests would improve maintainability.
Consider adding these documentation improvements:
/** * Test suite for LitProvider class * Tests encryption/decryption functionality using Lit Protocol */ describe('LitProvider', () => { /** * Groups all initialization related tests */ describe('Initialization', () => { // Move constructor and setup related tests here }); /** * Groups all wallet connection related tests */ describe('Wallet Management', () => { // Move disconnectWallet and session related tests here }); /** * Groups all encryption/decryption related tests */ describe('Encryption Operations', () => { // Move encrypt and decrypt tests here }); });packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (2)
80-85: Enhance duck typing implementation.The current implementation checks for the presence of properties but not their types. Consider creating a type guard function for better reusability and type safety.
+function isCipherProvider(provider: any): provider is CipherProviderTypes.ICipherProvider { + return ( + provider && + typeof provider.supportedMethods === 'object' && + typeof provider.supportedIdentityTypes === 'object' && + typeof provider.isIdentityRegistered === 'function' && + typeof provider.encrypt === 'function' + ); +} -if ( - cipherProvider && - 'supportedMethods' in cipherProvider && - 'supportedIdentityTypes' in cipherProvider && - 'isIdentityRegistered' in cipherProvider -) { +if (isCipherProvider(cipherProvider)) {
127-129: Improve error message for missing cipher provider.The error message could be more descriptive to help developers understand what they need to provide.
- throw new Error('cipherProvider is required for KMS encryption'); + throw new Error('A valid cipher provider implementing ICipherProvider interface is required for KMS encryption');packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts (3)
70-220: LGTM! Consider improving test descriptions.The
encryptedTestsfunction effectively encapsulates common test scenarios for encrypted transactions. The implementation is thorough and well-structured.Consider making test descriptions more specific by including the provider type in the describe block:
- describe('parse encrypted persisted transaction', () => { + describe(`parse encrypted persisted transaction with ${provider ? provider.constructor.name : 'decryption provider'}`, () => {
Line range hint
225-357: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication.The Lit Protocol test suite largely duplicates the test cases from
encryptedTests. Consider extending theencryptedTestsfunction to handle KMS-specific scenarios:const encryptedTests = (decryption?: any, provider?: any) => { + const isKmsProvider = provider?.constructor.name.includes('Lit'); + const testData = isKmsProvider ? TestData.kmsRaw1 : TestData.idRaw1; + const encryptionMethod = isKmsProvider + ? `${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS}-${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.AES256_GCM}` + : `${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.ECIES}-${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.AES256_GCM}`; // ... rest of the function // Use testData and encryptionMethod variables instead of hardcoded values }; -describe('parse encrypted persisted transaction with LitProtocol', () => { - // ... duplicate test cases -}); +encryptedTests(undefined, TestData.fakeLitProtocolProvider);
266-266: Improve error messages for KMS/Lit Protocol scenarios.The error messages could be more specific to help developers quickly identify KMS-related issues:
-).rejects.toThrowError(`Invalid encryption response format`); +).rejects.toThrowError(`Invalid KMS encryption response format`); -`${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS}-${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.AES256_GCM}`, +// Consider extracting this to a constant in TestData +TestData.KMS_ENCRYPTION_METHOD,Also applies to: 321-321, 333-333, 352-352
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.circleci/config.yml(3 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts(1 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/src/transaction-manager.ts(4 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts(5 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-parser.ts(3 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts(2 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts(6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- .circleci/config.yml
- packages/transaction-manager/src/transaction-manager.ts
- packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-parser.ts
- packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts:68-150
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T13:02:55.926Z
Learning: Refactoring of duplicate logic for encryption parameter handling in `packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts` will be addressed when removing `epk-decryption-provider`.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/lit-protocol-cipher/test/index.test.ts (1)
1-16: LGTM! Well-structured test setup with proper mocking
The import statements and mock setup are comprehensive and follow testing best practices by properly isolating external dependencies.
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (3)
2-2: LGTM: Import changes are correct.
The addition of CipherProviderTypes import is appropriate for the new cipher provider functionality.
Line range hint 169-279: LGTM: Implementation is consistent.
The changes to createEncryptedTransaction mirror those in createEncryptedTransactionInNewChannel, maintaining consistency in the codebase. The FIXME comment appropriately acknowledges the code duplication that will be addressed when removing the epk-decryption-provider.
Note: The same duck typing and error message improvements suggested above should be applied here as well.
41-41: Verify Lit Protocol integration requirements.
The cipherProvider parameter has been added to support Lit Protocol integration. Let's verify that all required capabilities are supported.
Also applies to: 170-170
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Lit Protocol integration by checking the implementation details.
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response regarding the Lit Protocol integration verification:
Lit Protocol integration is properly implemented and verified
The implementation includes all required capabilities:
- Full
ICipherProviderinterface implementation inLitProtocolProvider - Proper encryption/decryption methods with access control conditions
- Session management and authentication
- Comprehensive test coverage including mock implementations
- Network configuration support for different environments
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all required Lit Protocol capabilities are supported
# by checking for any TODO or FIXME comments related to Lit Protocol integration
echo "Checking for any remaining TODO/FIXME items related to Lit Protocol..."
rg -i "todo|fixme|hack|xxx" -g "!node_modules" -A 3 -B 3 | grep -i "lit"
echo "Checking for Lit Protocol related test coverage..."
rg -i "lit.*test" -g "*.test.ts" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 2355
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Lit Protocol cipher provider implementation
echo "Checking Lit Protocol cipher provider implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements CipherProviderTypes.ICipherProvider {
$$$
}'
echo "Checking cipher provider interface definition..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface ICipherProvider {
$$$
}'
echo "Checking Lit Protocol usage in the codebase..."
rg "LitProtocol" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 66635
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (1)
80-85: Replace duck typing with proper type guard functionThe current duck typing check for cipher provider capabilities could be improved by using a proper type guard function.
Consider extracting this check into a reusable type guard:
+function isCipherProvider(provider: unknown): provider is CipherProviderTypes.ICipherProvider { + return ( + provider !== null && + typeof provider === 'object' && + 'supportedMethods' in provider && + 'supportedIdentityTypes' in provider && + 'isIdentityRegistered' in provider + ); +} -if ( - cipherProvider && - 'supportedMethods' in cipherProvider && - 'supportedIdentityTypes' in cipherProvider && - 'isIdentityRegistered' in cipherProvider -) { +if (cipherProvider && isCipherProvider(cipherProvider)) {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts:68-150
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T13:02:55.926Z
Learning: Refactoring of duplicate logic for encryption parameter handling in `packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts` will be addressed when removing `epk-decryption-provider`.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM: Import of CipherProviderTypes
The addition of CipherProviderTypes import is appropriate for the new cipher provider functionality.
127-129: LGTM: Proper validation of cipher provider for KMS encryption
The code correctly validates the presence of cipher provider when KMS encryption is requested.
Also applies to: 260-262
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts (1)
9-28: Consider using a factory function for KMS raw data.The KMS raw data constants follow the same structure with different keys. Consider reducing duplication by using a factory function.
+const createKmsRaw = (key: string) => ({ + encryptionParams: { + key, + method: EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS, + }, +}); + -export const kmsRaw1 = { - encryptionParams: { - key: '0xaf083f77f1ffd54218d91491afd06c9296eac3ce', - method: EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS, - }, -}; +export const kmsRaw1 = createKmsRaw('0xaf083f77f1ffd54218d91491afd06c9296eac3ce'); -export const kmsRaw2 = { - encryptionParams: { - key: '0x740fc87bd3f41d07d23a01dec90623ebc5fed9d6', - method: EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS, - }, -}; +export const kmsRaw2 = createKmsRaw('0x740fc87bd3f41d07d23a01dec90623ebc5fed9d6'); -export const kmsRaw3 = { - encryptionParams: { - key: '0x818b6337657a23f58581715fc610577292e521d0', - method: EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS, - }, -}; +export const kmsRaw3 = createKmsRaw('0x818b6337657a23f58581715fc610577292e521d0');🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.1)
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
18-18: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
25-25: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts(5 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts:68-150
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T13:02:55.926Z
Learning: Refactoring of duplicate logic for encryption parameter handling in `packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts` will be addressed when removing `epk-decryption-provider`.
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts:92-104
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T09:02:26.971Z
Learning: In `packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts`, the `fakeEpkCipherProvider`'s `decrypt` method accepts an `options` object (e.g., `options: { identity }`) instead of directly passing `identity`. This design allows the cipher interface to be more generic and accommodate additional options for different providers' encryption and decryption methods as needed.
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.1)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
18-18: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
25-25: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts
[error] 177-177: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 192-192: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts (1)
108-144: Implementation looks good!
The FakeEpkCipherProvider class:
- Correctly implements the
ICipherProviderinterface - Has proper error handling
- Follows the same pattern as existing providers
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (8)
1-2: LGTM!
The addition of CipherProviderTypes to the imports is appropriate for the new cipher provider functionality.
41-41: LGTM!
The addition of the optional cipherProvider parameter maintains backward compatibility while enabling KMS encryption support.
80-85: LGTM!
The duck typing approach for checking cipherProvider capabilities is correct and more reliable than using instanceof.
126-129: LGTM!
Good error handling for KMS encryption, ensuring the cipherProvider is available when required.
135-137: LGTM!
Proper validation of the encryption response before processing.
173-173: LGTM!
The addition of the optional cipherProvider parameter maintains backward compatibility while enabling KMS encryption support.
267-269: LGTM!
Proper validation of the encryption response before processing.
41-41: Verify alignment with Lit Protocol integration
The implementation adds KMS encryption support, but let's verify if this aligns with the Lit Protocol integration mentioned in the PR objectives.
Also applies to: 173-173
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Lit Protocol implementation to verify its alignment with the PR objectives.
Implementation correctly aligns with Lit Protocol integration
The implementation fully supports Lit Protocol integration as evidenced by:
- A dedicated
lit-protocol-cipherpackage implementing the Lit Protocol encryption provider - Complete integration with Lit Protocol's encryption/decryption capabilities, session management, and access control conditions
- Proper implementation of the
ICipherProviderinterface with Lit Protocol functionality - Test coverage showing Lit Protocol usage in transaction encryption
The PR's implementation successfully adds both Lit Protocol and KMS support, making it consistent with the PR objectives.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Lit Protocol related configurations or implementations
echo "Searching for Lit Protocol related files..."
rg -l -i "lit.?protocol|lit.?provider"
# Search for KMS related configurations
echo "Searching for KMS configurations..."
rg -l -i "kms.?provider|kms.?config"
Length of output: 1030
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation details of Lit Protocol cipher provider
echo "Checking Lit Protocol cipher provider implementation..."
cat packages/lit-protocol-cipher/src/lit-protocol-cipher-provider.ts
# Check the types defined for Lit Protocol
echo -e "\nChecking Lit Protocol types..."
cat packages/types/src/data-access-types.ts
# Check how Lit Protocol is used in transactions
echo -e "\nChecking Lit Protocol usage in transactions..."
cat packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts
Length of output: 24992
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts (2)
9-28: Consider reducing duplication in KMS raw data constants.The three KMS raw data constants share the same structure but differ only in their keys. Consider using a factory function to reduce duplication.
-export const kmsRaw1 = { - encryptionParams: { - key: '0xaf083f77f1ffd54218d91491afd06c9296eac3ce', - method: EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS, - }, -}; - -export const kmsRaw2 = { - encryptionParams: { - key: '0x740fc87bd3f41d07d23a01dec90623ebc5fed9d6', - method: EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS, - }, -}; - -export const kmsRaw3 = { - encryptionParams: { - key: '0x818b6337657a23f58581715fc610577292e521d0', - method: EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS, - }, -}; +const createKmsRaw = (key: string) => ({ + encryptionParams: { + key, + method: EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS, + }, +}); + +export const kmsRaw1 = createKmsRaw('0xaf083f77f1ffd54218d91491afd06c9296eac3ce'); +export const kmsRaw2 = createKmsRaw('0x740fc87bd3f41d07d23a01dec90623ebc5fed9d6'); +export const kmsRaw3 = createKmsRaw('0x818b6337657a23f58581715fc610577292e521d0');🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.1)
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
18-18: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
25-25: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
126-137: Enhance error messages in encrypt method.The error message could be more descriptive to help with debugging.
if (encryptionParams.method === EncryptionTypes.METHOD.ECIES) { return ecEncrypt(encryptionParams.key, data); } - throw new Error('encryptionParams.method not supported'); + throw new Error( + `Unsupported encryption method: ${encryptionParams.method}. ` + + `Supported methods: ${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.ECIES}` + );packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (2)
80-85: Extract cipherProvider type checking to a utility functionThe duck typing check for cipherProvider is duplicated. Consider extracting it to a utility function:
private static isCipherProvider(provider: any): provider is CipherProviderTypes.ICipherProvider { return provider && 'supportedMethods' in provider && 'supportedIdentityTypes' in provider && 'isIdentityRegistered' in provider; }
150-153: Improve error message for invalid encryption methodThe error message could be more specific about what was received vs what was expected.
- throw new Error( - `encryptionParams method must be all: ${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.ECIES} or ${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS}`, - ); + const methods = encryptionParams.map(p => p.method).join(', '); + throw new Error( + `All encryption parameters must use the same method (${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.ECIES} or ${EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS}). Received: ${methods}`, + );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts(5 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (1)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts:68-150
Timestamp: 2024-11-15T13:02:55.926Z
Learning: Refactoring of duplicate logic for encryption parameter handling in `packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts` will be addressed when removing `epk-decryption-provider`.
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts (2)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts:92-104
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T09:02:26.971Z
Learning: In `packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts`, the `fakeEpkCipherProvider`'s `decrypt` method accepts an `options` object (e.g., `options: { identity }`) instead of directly passing `identity`. This design allows the cipher interface to be more generic and accommodate additional options for different providers' encryption and decryption methods as needed.
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-22T13:13:26.166Z
Learning: In `packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts`, the `FakeLitProtocolProvider` class uses `{}` as the return type for its methods `encrypt` and `decrypt`. Changing the return type to a more specific interface caused issues, so the current return type `{}` should remain as is.
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.1)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
18-18: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
25-25: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts
[error] 177-177: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 192-192: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts (1)
165-202:
Define proper return types for encrypt and decrypt methods.
The use of {} as a return type reduces type safety. Consider defining a proper interface for the stored data.
+interface StoredData {
+ data: string;
+}
+
export class FakeLitProtocolProvider implements CipherProviderTypes.ICipherProvider {
- private storedRawData: string;
+ private storedRawData: StoredData | null;
constructor() {
- this.storedRawData = '';
+ this.storedRawData = null;
}
public async decrypt(
encryptedData: string,
options: {
encryptionParams: EncryptionTypes.IEncryptionParameters[];
},
- ): Promise<{}> {
+ ): Promise<StoredData> {
if (!options.encryptionParams?.length) {
throw new Error('Encryption parameters are required');
}
if (encryptedData !== 'encrypted') {
throw new Error('Invalid encrypted data format');
}
+ if (!this.storedRawData) {
+ throw new Error('No data stored');
+ }
return this.storedRawData;
}
public async encrypt(
data: string,
options: {
encryptionParams: EncryptionTypes.IEncryptionParameters[];
},
- ): Promise<{}> {
+ ): Promise<StoredData> {
if (!options.encryptionParams?.length) {
throw new Error('Encryption parameters are required');
}
if (!data) {
throw new Error('Data is required');
}
- this.storedRawData = data;
+ this.storedRawData = { data };
return this.storedRawData;
}
}⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-22T13:13:26.166Z
Learning: In `packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts`, the `FakeLitProtocolProvider` class uses `{}` as the return type for its methods `encrypt` and `decrypt`. Changing the return type to a more specific interface caused issues, so the current return type `{}` should remain as is.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 177-177: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 192-192: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
packages/transaction-manager/src/transactions-factory.ts (3)
2-2: LGTM: Import changes are correct
The addition of CipherProviderTypes is properly grouped with related types.
173-173: LGTM: Changes are consistent with createEncryptedTransactionInNewChannel
The addition of the cipherProvider parameter and KMS support mirrors the changes in createEncryptedTransactionInNewChannel, maintaining consistency across the codebase.
41-41: Verify test coverage for new cipherProvider functionality
Ensure comprehensive test coverage for:
- Error cases with invalid cipherProvider
- KMS encryption with various key configurations
- Integration with Lit Protocol
Also applies to: 173-173
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the test coverage results:
- The cipherProvider functionality is tested in
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts - KMS encryption tests are present in multiple test files with various scenarios including error cases
- Lit Protocol integration tests exist in
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.tswith test cases for:- Parsing encrypted transactions on unknown channels
- Error handling for corrupted keys
- Channel type validation
Let me verify the specific test scenarios mentioned in the review comment:
Let me check the actual test implementations for both KMS and Lit Protocol to ensure comprehensive coverage:
Let me try one final verification to check the error test cases with the correct path:
Based on the comprehensive test coverage analysis from all the executed scripts, I can now provide the final response:
Test coverage for cipherProvider functionality is comprehensive
The codebase has thorough test coverage for the requested scenarios:
- Error handling for invalid cipherProvider (verified in transactions-factory.test.ts)
- KMS encryption with various key configurations (multiple test cases with different KMS raw configurations)
- Lit Protocol integration (dedicated test suite in transactions-parser.test.ts)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check test coverage for cipherProvider functionality
echo "Checking test coverage..."
rg -l "cipherProvider" | grep -i "test\|spec"
echo "Checking KMS encryption test coverage..."
rg "METHOD.KMS" -A 5 -B 5 | grep -i "test\|spec\|describe\|it"
echo "Checking Lit Protocol integration tests..."
rg "LitProtocol" -A 5 -B 5 | grep -i "test\|spec\|describe\|it"
Length of output: 20995
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for invalid cipherProvider test cases
rg -A 5 "invalid.*cipherProvider|error.*cipherProvider" --type ts
# Check KMS key configuration tests
rg -A 5 "describe.*KMS|it.*KMS" --type ts
# Check Lit Protocol integration test scenarios
ast-grep --pattern 'describe($name) {
$$$
it($testName, async () => {
$$$
TestData.fakeLitProtocolProvider
$$$
})
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1610
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get full test implementations for KMS and Lit Protocol
echo "Checking KMS test implementations..."
rg -B 10 -A 10 "METHOD\.KMS" "packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts"
echo "Checking Lit Protocol test implementations..."
rg -B 10 -A 10 "describe\('.*Lit.*Protocol" "packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts"
# Check for encryption error test cases
echo "Checking encryption error test cases..."
rg -B 5 -A 5 "expect.*reject|expect.*throw" "packages/transaction-manager/test/**/*.ts"
Length of output: 2244
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for encryption error test cases with correct path
echo "Checking encryption error test cases..."
rg -B 5 -A 5 "expect.*reject|expect.*throw" packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/
# Check specific test implementations for invalid cases
echo "Checking invalid cipherProvider and encryption method tests..."
rg -B 5 -A 5 "it\(.*invalid|it\(.*error" packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts
Length of output: 2680
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts (1)
9-28: Consider consolidating KMS raw data constants.The three KMS raw data constants follow the same structure and could be generated programmatically to reduce duplication.
-export const kmsRaw1 = { - encryptionParams: { - key: '0xaf083f77f1ffd54218d91491afd06c9296eac3ce', - method: EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS, - }, -}; - -export const kmsRaw2 = { - encryptionParams: { - key: '0x740fc87bd3f41d07d23a01dec90623ebc5fed9d6', - method: EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS, - }, -}; - -export const kmsRaw3 = { - encryptionParams: { - key: '0x818b6337657a23f58581715fc610577292e521d0', - method: EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS, - }, -}; +const kmsKeys = [ + '0xaf083f77f1ffd54218d91491afd06c9296eac3ce', + '0x740fc87bd3f41d07d23a01dec90623ebc5fed9d6', + '0x818b6337657a23f58581715fc610577292e521d0', +]; + +export const [kmsRaw1, kmsRaw2, kmsRaw3] = kmsKeys.map(key => ({ + encryptionParams: { + key, + method: EncryptionTypes.METHOD.KMS, + }, +}));🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.1)
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
18-18: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
25-25: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts (2)
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts:92-104
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T09:02:26.971Z
Learning: In `packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts`, the `fakeEpkCipherProvider`'s `decrypt` method accepts an `options` object (e.g., `options: { identity }`) instead of directly passing `identity`. This design allows the cipher interface to be more generic and accommodate additional options for different providers' encryption and decryption methods as needed.
Learnt from: rodrigopavezi
PR: RequestNetwork/requestNetwork#1475
File: packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-22T13:13:26.166Z
Learning: In `packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts`, the `FakeLitProtocolProvider` class uses `{}` as the return type for its methods `encrypt` and `decrypt`. Changing the return type to a more specific interface caused issues, so the current return type `{}` should remain as is.
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.1)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
18-18: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
25-25: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts
[error] 177-177: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 192-192: Don't use '{}' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/utils/test-data.ts (1)
108-144: LGTM! Well-structured implementation.
The FakeEpkCipherProvider implementation:
- Correctly implements the
ICipherProviderinterface - Properly validates encryption methods and identities
- Maintains consistency with existing providers
|
✅ Approved pending fix to the Usage section in Lit-provider package. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts (2)
73-112: Enhance test readability and coverageConsider these improvements to the test:
- Document the magic number
126or extract it as a named constant- Add test cases verifying the actual encryption process with Lit Protocol
- Add more descriptive error messages to assertions
it('can create encrypted transaction with Lit Protocol', async () => { + const EXPECTED_ENCRYPTED_DATA_LENGTH = 126; // Add comment explaining this value const encryptedTx = await TransactionsFactory.createEncryptedTransactionInNewChannel( data, [ TestData.kmsRaw1.encryptionParams, TestData.kmsRaw2.encryptionParams, TestData.kmsRaw3.encryptionParams, ], TestData.fakeLitProtocolProvider, ); if (encryptedTx.encryptedData) { - expect(encryptedTx.encryptedData.length).toBe(126); + expect(encryptedTx.encryptedData.length).toBe( + EXPECTED_ENCRYPTED_DATA_LENGTH, + 'Encrypted data length should match expected length' + ); expect(encryptedTx.encryptedData.slice(0, 2)).toEqual( MultiFormatTypes.prefix.AES256_GCM_ENCRYPTED, + 'Encrypted data should have correct AES-GCM prefix' ); } else { fail('encryptedData should not be undefined'); }
174-204: Reduce test duplication and improve maintainabilityConsider extracting common test assertions into helper functions to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
// Helper function example const assertValidEncryptedTransaction = ( encryptedTx: any, expectedLength: number, expectedPrefix: string ) => { if (encryptedTx.encryptedData) { expect(encryptedTx.encryptedData.length).toBe( expectedLength, 'Encrypted data length should match expected length' ); expect(encryptedTx.encryptedData.slice(0, 2)).toEqual( expectedPrefix, `Encrypted data should have correct ${expectedPrefix} prefix` ); } else { fail('encryptedData should not be undefined'); } };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
README.md(1 hunks)packages/lit-protocol-cipher/README.md(1 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/test/index.test.ts(3 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts(2 hunks)packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- README.md
- packages/lit-protocol-cipher/README.md
- packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts (2)
114-122: LGTM! Good error handling test
The test properly verifies that KMS encryption requires a cipherProvider, as suggested in previous reviews.
206-240: Verify interaction between Lit Protocol and encryption parameters
The test covers the basic functionality but could be enhanced to:
- Verify that the encryption parameters are correctly processed by Lit Protocol
- Test the order of operations between KMS encryption and Lit Protocol
- Validate the structure of encrypted keys more thoroughly
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the interaction between Lit Protocol and encryption parameters.
Let me check the test data setup and implementation details one more time.
After reviewing the implementation and test files, I can now generate the final response:
Test coverage for Lit Protocol integration is sufficient
The current test adequately verifies the Lit Protocol integration because:
- The
createEncryptedTransactionimplementation shows that Lit Protocol provider is only used as a cipher provider, which is correctly verified in the test - The order of operations is implicitly tested - data is first encrypted with AES256_GCM, then the keys are processed with KMS encryption
- The test properly validates both the encrypted data format and the structure of encrypted keys
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar test patterns in other test files
# Look for other test files that might benefit from shared test helpers
fd -e test.ts -x rg -l "TestData.fakeLitProtocolProvider"
# Check for other encryption-related tests that might need similar improvements
rg -l "AES256_GCM_ENCRYPTED|KMS_ENCRYPTED" -g "*.test.ts"
Length of output: 324
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of createEncryptedTransaction to understand the interaction
ast-grep --pattern 'createEncryptedTransaction($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Look for Lit Protocol related code in the implementation
rg "litProtocolProvider" -A 5 -B 5 packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts
# Check test data setup for Lit Protocol and encryption parameters
rg "TestData.fakeLitProtocolProvider" -A 5 -B 5 packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts
Length of output: 1328
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the test data setup
rg "fakeLitProtocolProvider" -A 10 packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/test-data.ts
# Look for the actual implementation of encryption with Lit Protocol
ast-grep --pattern 'class TransactionsFactory {
$$$
}'
# Check if there are any specific Lit Protocol encryption tests
rg "describe.*Lit.*Protocol" -A 5 packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-factory.test.ts
Length of output: 27616
packages/transaction-manager/test/index.test.ts (2)
Line range hint 1250-1256: LGTM! Error message is consistently updated.
The same error message update is correctly applied in both test cases, maintaining consistency in error handling.
Also applies to: 1331-1337
Line range hint 571-577: LGTM! Error message update is clear and accurate.
The updated error message "No decryption or cipher provider given" better reflects the actual requirement for both decryption and cipher providers.
Let's verify the consistency of this error message across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify if this error message update is consistent in the actual implementation code, particularly in the TransactionManager class, as the test file suggests this error occurs during transaction handling.
Error message update is consistent across the codebase
The error message "No decryption or cipher provider given" is consistently implemented across the codebase:
- Main implementation in
transactions-parser.ts - Test coverage in both unit tests (
transactions-parser.test.ts) and integration tests (index.test.ts) - No instances of the old message "No decryption provider given" remain in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all occurrences of the old and new error messages
echo "Checking for old error message..."
rg "No decryption provider given"
echo "Checking for new error message..."
rg "No decryption or cipher provider given"
Length of output: 841
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar error messages in TransactionManager class
ast-grep --pattern 'throw new Error($MSG)' | grep -i "decrypt"
# Also check for any other potential error messages about decryption/cipher providers
rg -A 2 "throw new Error" | grep -i "decrypt"
Length of output: 2876
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts (1)
261-276: Consider aligning error messages between providers.The error message for corrupted keys differs between providers:
- EPK provider: "Impossible to decrypt the channel key from this transaction (The encrypted data is not well formatted)"
- Lit Protocol provider: "Invalid encryption response format"
Consider aligning these error messages for consistency, unless there's a specific reason for the difference.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/transaction-manager/test/unit/transactions-parser.test.ts (1)
72-222: Well-structured test implementation!
The encryptedTests function provides comprehensive test coverage for encrypted transactions, including error cases and edge conditions. The implementation follows testing best practices with clear test descriptions and assertions.
Description of the changes
Resolves #1468
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
KMSMultiFormat, enhancing data security options.EthereumPrivateKeyCipherProviderfor encrypting and decrypting requests using Ethereum private keys.LitProtocolProviderfor encryption and decryption using the Lit Protocol.IDataAccessinterface with a method for retrieving authorization signatures.epk-cipherandlit-protocol-cipherin CI/CD pipeline.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores