Skip to content

[DOCS] Standardize internal help strings and terminology in evolverstage.py#342

Open
RainRat wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs-internal-help-standardization-4470202406440676952
Open

[DOCS] Standardize internal help strings and terminology in evolverstage.py#342
RainRat wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
docs-internal-help-standardization-4470202406440676952

Conversation

@RainRat
Copy link
Owner

@RainRat RainRat commented Feb 13, 2026

This submission standardizes internal help strings and user-facing error messages in evolverstage.py to follow 'Plain English' and 'No Jargon' guidelines. Key improvements include replacing technical terms like "genetic algorithm" and "round-robin" with more descriptive alternatives, and adopting "folder" as the standard term for directories. The unit tests have been updated to reflect these changes, maintaining full test coverage and correctness.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 4470202406440676952 started by @RainRat

Refactored user-facing strings across `evolverstage.py` to improve accessibility and professional tone.
- Replaced "genetic algorithm" with "evolution phases".
- Replaced "round-robin" with "everyone-vs-everyone".
- Standardized the use of "folder" instead of "directory" in help text and error messages.
- Simplified CLI usage instructions and clarified configuration error messages.
- Updated the test suite to match the new terminology and ensure 100% pass rate.

Co-authored-by: RainRat <20098977+RainRat@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant