Skip to content

Conversation

@axel-grc
Copy link
Collaborator

@axel-grc axel-grc commented Nov 21, 2025

Close #69

I am not sure if wrapping all those types is really necessary.

@axel-grc axel-grc requested a review from SimonRit November 21, 2025 14:16
Copy link
Collaborator

@SimonRit SimonRit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. There seems to be issue reported by the CI, can you address them? E.g., https://github.com/RTKConsortium/ITKCudaCommon/pull/89/checks#step:5:731. Regarding your question, yes, I think it can be wrapped for all types wrapped for itk::CudaImage. We could possibly implement a macro to simplify this a bit.

@axel-grc axel-grc force-pushed the linter branch 2 times, most recently from 5bf90a4 to 5c4e247 Compare December 19, 2025 16:36
@SimonRit SimonRit added this to the CudaCommon 2.0 milestone Jan 7, 2026
@axel-grc axel-grc force-pushed the linter branch 6 times, most recently from 0fe4158 to 0ea19ae Compare January 13, 2026 15:27
@axel-grc axel-grc force-pushed the linter branch 2 times, most recently from baeed30 to 7e4e8e8 Compare January 20, 2026 14:41
@axel-grc axel-grc force-pushed the linter branch 3 times, most recently from 2199aaa to f35b97e Compare January 22, 2026 10:53
@axel-grc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

axel-grc commented Jan 22, 2026

I covered most of the possible combinations of types, but I couldn't copy the same types as the base itk filters because there is a lot of conditional wrapping, I prefered keep it simple.

@axel-grc axel-grc requested a review from SimonRit January 22, 2026 13:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CudaSquareImageFilter is not wrapped

2 participants