Skip to content

189#190

Closed
RAprogramm wants to merge 0 commit intomainfrom
189
Closed

189#190
RAprogramm wants to merge 0 commit intomainfrom
189

Conversation

@RAprogramm
Copy link
Owner

Summary

Implemented comprehensive Codecov integration with modern 2025 features including PR comments, status checks, coverage thresholds, and detailed configuration.

Changes

Configuration File (codecov.yml)

  • Complete Codecov YAML configuration validated with official API
  • Settings for CI integration, report aging, branch comparison

Coverage Thresholds

  • Project target: 95% minimum coverage
  • Patch target: 95% for new code
  • Threshold: 1% allowed drop for project, 5% for patches
  • Status checks will fail if coverage drops below thresholds

PR Comment Integration

  • Modern condensed layout: condensed_header, condensed_files, condensed_footer
  • Automatic comments on every PR with coverage diff
  • Behavior: Update existing comment instead of creating new ones
  • Shows project coverage changes and file-level details

Status Checks

  • GitHub status checks for blocking PRs below threshold
  • Project-level coverage comparison against base
  • Patch-level coverage for new code only
  • Changes status for informational diff display

Ignore Paths

  • Tests: tests/**/*, **/tests.rs
  • Benchmarks: benches/**/*, **/benches.rs
  • Examples: examples/**/*
  • Focused coverage on production code only

GitHub Integration

  • Annotations enabled for inline coverage feedback
  • Requires both base and head reports for comparison
  • CI must pass before coverage processing

Benefits

  • Quality Enforcement: 95% coverage target maintains high test standards
  • PR Visibility: Automatic coverage reports in every PR
  • Regression Prevention: Status checks block coverage drops
  • Developer Feedback: Inline annotations show uncovered lines
  • Historical Tracking: Coverage trends visible on Codecov dashboard

Badge Status

Badge already configured in README.template.md with token:

[![codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/RAprogramm/masterror/graph/badge.svg?token=OD4F7LWWB8)](https://codecov.io/gh/RAprogramm/masterror)

Badge will display after first successful coverage upload to Codecov.

Validation

Configuration validated with Codecov API:

$ curl --data-binary @codecov.yml https://codecov.io/validate
Valid!

Test Plan

  • Configuration validated successfully
  • All 157 tests pass
  • Cargo fmt and clippy pass
  • No regression in existing functionality

Next Steps

After merge:

  • Monitor first PR with Codecov comments
  • Verify status checks appear correctly
  • Check badge visibility after coverage upload
  • Adjust thresholds if needed based on actual coverage

Documentation References

Closes #189

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

- name: Generate test report (JSON format)
if: always()
continue-on-error: true
run: |
cargo +${{ matrix.rust }} test --all-features --workspace --no-fail-fast -- \
--format json -Z unstable-options --report-time > test-results-${{ matrix.rust }}.json || true

P1 Badge Make test report generation shell-agnostic for Windows runs

The test matrix now targets windows-latest, but the new "Generate test report" step still uses bash-only syntax (\ line continuation and || true) without overriding the default shell. Windows runners execute run steps in PowerShell, so this command fails before producing test-results-*.json, and the subsequent artifact upload step fails because the file is missing. As a result, every Windows test job will fail and the multi-platform CI introduced here never succeeds. Specify shell: bash (or rewrite the command in PowerShell) so the step works on Windows.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Comprehensive Codecov integration with 2025 features

1 participant